On 07/04/2017 03:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 09:32 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
>> Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time
>> it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen these random failures several times,
>> also for Astronomy for example. So a new
On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 09:32 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
> Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time
> it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen these random failures several times,
> also for Astronomy for example. So a new compose should be done here to
> ensure the Spin ge
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/137 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170701.n.0):
ID: 117168 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/117168
ID: 117189 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-is
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 04:21:31PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Thank you Till for the hard work on this. I wonder if it would be
> better to retire these packages at branching from now on? That way we
> never had to deal with worrying about composes not working
> afterwords.. because we kn
Thank you Till for the hard work on this. I wonder if it would be
better to retire these packages at branching from now on? That way we
never had to deal with worrying about composes not working
afterwords.. because we know they probably won't work until fixed.
On 4 July 2017 at 16:12, Till Maas
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:12:55PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> since there were too many packages with broken dependencies and we lack
> the tooling to properly identify which packages can be safely retired
> without endangering the final compose, the current packages with broken
> dependencies will
Hi,
since there were too many packages with broken dependencies and we lack
the tooling to properly identify which packages can be safely retired
without endangering the final compose, the current packages with broken
dependencies will not be retired for Fedora 26. We are going to rework
the clean
On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 07:06 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 4/126 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in 26 RC 1.3):
>
> ID: 116864Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
> URL: http
Le 04/07/2017 à 12:18, Pavel Lisý a écrit :
Hello
I have laptop Lenovo X201 with fedora for a long time. I haven't had any
problem with HW support up to release 25. Started with F25 beta -
system started to be unstable and I'm not sure why. I can log in and work
for while - from a few tens of mi
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> I've just submitted a change proposal for creating Flatpaks out of Fedora
> package content:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Graphical_
> Applications_as_Flatpaks
>
> This is submitted as a F27 change proposal, but it's expected th
On 07/04/2017 12:59 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:11:33PM +0800, Zamir SUN wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Recently I want to continue the package review request of cvechecker[1]
>> with mine since it has been quiet for a long time.
>>
>> So I did commented in commen
On 2017-07-03, Owen Taylor wrote:
> * Is a module tied to the exact version of the modules it requires
> that it was built against, or can it be used with an updated version
> of that module within the same stream without a rebuild?
It's bound to the stream. Modules are expected to preserve ABI i
Hi,
First of all, make sure to try Gnome on Xorg or KDE session (you should see
this option after clicking on "gear" icon on login screen). Is it stable?
Can you check abrt for anything suspicious?
2017-07-04 12:18 GMT+02:00 Pavel Lisý :
> Hello
>
> I have laptop Lenovo X201 with fedora for a lo
Hello
I have laptop Lenovo X201 with fedora for a long time. I haven't had any
problem with HW support up to release 25. Started with F25 beta -
system started to be unstable and I'm not sure why. I can log in and work
for while - from a few tens of minutes to 1-3 hours. Than display turns to
blac
Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time
it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen these random failures several times,
also for Astronomy for example. So a new compose should be done here to
ensure the Spin gets in properly, it is not an issue with the Spin here
but an issue
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/126 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26 RC 1.3):
ID: 116864 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/116864
ID: 116884 Test: arm Minimal-raw
Hi everyone!
Today (2017-07-04) is the submission deadline for System Wide Changes
of Fedora 27 [1]. Please schedule your upcoming System Wide Changes
for the next (Fedora 28) release.
Self Contained Changes proposals submission deadline is on 2017-07-25
with changes completion (testable state) i
17 matches
Mail list logo
