glog upgrade next week

Hi guys, I'll upgrade glog-0.3.3 to glog-0.3.5 next week, possible affected packages according to repoquery: ceres-solver-1.12.0-5.fc27.src.rpm glog-0.3.3-12.fc25.src.rpm librime-1.2-14.fc27.src.rpm mesos-0.23.0-0.4ce5475.fc24.1.src.rpm ceres-solver-0:1.12.0-5.fc27.src librime-0:1.2-14.fc27.src m

Fedora 26-20170618.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 5/102 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170617.n.0): ID: 109705 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.f

Fedora Rawhide-20170618.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 79/102 (x86_64), 18/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test fa

[Test-Announce] 2017-06-19 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2017-06-19 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! Beta is signed off now, so let's check in on the libdb mess, where we stand with Final, and what else

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20170617.n.0 compose check report

On Sat, 2017-06-17 at 16:33 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 > Atomic qcow2 x86_64 > Workstation live i386 > Kde live x86_64 > Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 > Server boot i386 > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > Workstation live x86_64 > Kde live i386 >

Re: Outdated %fpc_arches macro?

Hi Artur, I'm the one to blame for the beginnings of the fpc_arches macro. This idea was born from a package review [1] and implementation started with a FESCO ticket [2]. The legacy ticket #608 should be ported with the same number from fedorahosted.org with the big move to pagure.io, I can't

Re: Outdated %fpc_arches macro?

Il 18/06/2017 12:31, Artur Iwicki ha scritto: Hello. I was trying to package some software written in Pascal, which means using the Free Pascal Compiler for building. FPC isn't available for all architectures that Fedora supports, so it was necessary to use the ExclusiveArch tag. I navigated t

Re: Outdated %fpc_arches macro?

> On 18-Jun-2017, at 4:01 PM, Artur Iwicki wrote: > > Hello. I was trying to package some software written in Pascal, which means > using the Free Pascal Compiler for building. FPC isn't available for all > architectures that Fedora supports, so it was necessary to use the > ExclusiveArch tag

Outdated %fpc_arches macro?

Hello. I was trying to package some software written in Pascal, which means using the Free Pascal Compiler for building. FPC isn't available for all architectures that Fedora supports, so it was necessary to use the ExclusiveArch tag. I navigated to fpc in PkgDB, opened the spec file and copy-p

Re: Orphaned Packages in branched (2017-06-18)

Hi, Am 18.06.2017 um 02:03 schrieb t...@fedoraproject.org: … Taken rabbitmq-java-client, see my separate e-mail for an excuse: Depending on: rabbitmq-java-client (23), status change: 2017-06-05 (1 weeks ago) metrics (maintained by: gil, java-sig) metrics-3.1.2-4.fc26.

Re: Orphaned packages: rabbitmq-java-client and lyra

Hi, because of an obvious major impact to other packages needing rabbitmq-java-client, as it turns out with recent "orphaned packages" notifications, it was decided I retake rabbitmq-java-client as co-maintainer at least. Sorry, it was not obvious to me how many packages are affected. Thanks t