Re: Modularity and packagers [was Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change]

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 22:17 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > > You add the package and other people start to use it. That's great > > until you need to change the version, but can't, because other people > > started to use it as a dependency and

registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25 cannot install packages

Hello, it seems registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25 was recently updated to some 10 month old version f3535ce68198 where packages cannot be installed due to missing /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-25-x86_64: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460094 -- Jan Pazdziora Seni

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Owen Taylor (otaylor) of package metacity

I've now turned over ownership of Metacity to Yaakov Selkowitz who had requested admin rights in pkgdb. He may well appreciate a co-maintainer. Note that metacity has two different roles in Fedora with somewhat conflicting priorities: - It is used during Anaconda operation. - It is used for G

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Owen Taylor (otaylor) of package metacity

On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 20:00 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Joachim Frieben > wrote: > > There exist several open bug reports for package metacity addressing > > the outdatedness of the version available from the build server, e.g. > > see > > > > https://

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Owen Taylor (otaylor) of package metacity

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Joachim Frieben wrote: There exist several open bug reports for package metacity addressing the outdatedness of the version available from the build server, e.g. see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217991. Package maintainer Owen Taylor has no

Re: Unresponsive maintainer Owen Taylor (otaylor) of package metacity

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 09:05:08PM -, Joachim Frieben wrote: > There exist several open bug reports for package metacity addressing the > outdatedness of the version available from the build server, e.g. see > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217991. > > Package maintainer

Unresponsive maintainer Owen Taylor (otaylor) of package metacity

There exist several open bug reports for package metacity addressing the outdatedness of the version available from the build server, e.g. see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217991. Package maintainer Owen Taylor has not replied to any question or request for months. Does anyb

Re: Modularity and packagers [was Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change]

On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 22:17 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > You add the package and other people start to use it. That's great > until you need to change the version, but can't, because other people > started to use it as a dependency and it would break their stuff. I recently heard that it will be i

Re: Modularity and packagers [was Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change]

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 08/06/17 18:54, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:48:27PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: >> >>> I mean it would probably still be quite daunting for somebody that >>> did want to get into more detail I guess but I think I wound

Re: Modularity and packagers [was Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change]

On 08/06/17 18:54, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:48:27PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: I mean it would probably still be quite daunting for somebody that did want to get into more detail I guess but I think I wound up there following through from some of the other stuff about arbit

Modularity and packagers [was Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change]

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 06:48:27PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > I mean it would probably still be quite daunting for somebody that > did want to get into more detail I guess but I think I wound up > there following through from some of the other stuff about arbitrary > branching and I was mostly just

Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change

On 08/06/17 18:28, Adam Samalik wrote: On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Tom Hughes > wrote: Speaking for myself I came across that the other day and got as far as clicking through to the documentation page and seeing that just the contents was about four screen

Re: [HEADS UP] %add_maven_depmap macro deprecated and moved to javapackages-local

Also, ugh, please don't crosspost to closed mailing lists. - J< ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 08/06/17 17:58, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 10:38:11AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> >>> Normally I ignore any Modularity discussion. It doesn't interest me, >>> and it doesn't affect any projects I work on. It's

Re: [HEADS UP] %add_maven_depmap macro deprecated and moved to javapackages-local

> "MŠ" == Michael Šimáček writes: MŠ> With upcoming version of javapackages-tools there will be changes to MŠ> %add_maven_depmap macro: I believe this would need to be reflected in the packaging guidelines. At least %add_maven_depmap is mentioned twice, once as an alternative to %mvn_install

Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change

On 08/06/17 17:58, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 10:38:11AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Normally I ignore any Modularity discussion. It doesn't interest me, and it doesn't affect any projects I work on. It's my own fault that this change, which does affect me, was not on my

Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 10:38:11AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Normally I ignore any Modularity discussion. It doesn't interest me, > and it doesn't affect any projects I work on. It's my own fault that > this change, which does affect me, was not on my radar. I'm not > looking to stop the

Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change

On 06/08/2017 10:24 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: Speaking as someone on both side of doors... this is not something that was developed in secret at all. It's something that was implied by the modularity work — which has been very open — and the change "in the open last month" is all there is to it.

Fedora 26 Beta status is GO, release on June 13, 2017

The Fedora 26 Beta 1.4 compose [1] is considered as GOLD and is going to be shipped live on Tuesday, June 13th, 2017. For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs [3]. I would like to thank all the people who were and are still working on this release. [1] https://k

Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 09:42:45AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > This change, which is a pretty radical change, was only brought out > in the open last month. It's now being shovelled down our throats > after being behind closed doors for who knows how long. This is a > dramatic reversal from

Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change

On 06/08/2017 09:13 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: So, PkgDB now comes with a big fat warning saying: "Attention! PkgDB will be replaced during the week of July 10th, 2017. Please read the following for migration instructions: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb"; If

Review swap

Hi! I'd like to upgrade Frescobaldi to 3.0.0, and I need python3-poppler-qt5 to do it. If you can review it, I'll do one of yours. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459914 Thanks! -G -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in

Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change

So, PkgDB now comes with a big fat warning saying: "Attention! PkgDB will be replaced during the week of July 10th, 2017. Please read the following for migration instructions: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb"; If I go there I find no "migration instructions" what

F27 Self Contained Change: Decouple system java setting from java command setting

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Decouple system java setting from java command setting = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Decouple_system_java_setting_from_java_command_setting Change owner(s): * Michael Simacek * Mikolaj Izdebski Alternatives can be used to specify which Java installat

[HEADS UP] %add_maven_depmap macro deprecated and moved to javapackages-local

With upcoming version of javapackages-tools there will be changes to %add_maven_depmap macro: - It is considered deprecated. It was deprecated upstream long ago, but I think we've never sent an announcement. The replacement is %mvn_artifact + %mvn_install. For porting your specfiles, please re

Introductory mail

Hello Everyone, I'm a Computer science student (Christ University, Bangalore, India) and Intern (Fedora QA) at Red Hat. I contribute to the Fedora project (QA) and willing to increase my open source contribution. I recently participated in 'dnf 2.0 testday' and got interested in this project. I wo

Re: Updates not getting pushed to stable

On 08.06.2017 00:36, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi, I've got a couple of updates which are stuck waiting to get pushed to stable: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e46ec0bbe8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017

Re: Updates not getting pushed to stable

On 07/06/17 23:36 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: >> I've got a couple of updates which are stuck waiting to get pushed to >> stable: >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e46ec0bbe8 >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/

Introduction - Prakash Mishra

Hello Everyone, I'm Prakash, a Computer Applications student at Christ University, Bangalore, India. I have been contributing to Fedora QA for a year now under the mentorship of Sumantro Mukherjee and also learning python. I look forward to contributing to Fedora devel. P.S. It would be great if

Re: mame build OOMs on f24 and f25 i686, succeeds on other arches and branches

Am 08.06.2017 um 09:13 schrieb Julian Sikorski: W dniu 07.06.2017 o 21:14, Björn 'besser82' Esser pisze: Am 07.06.2017 um 20:21 schrieb Julian Sikorski: W dniu 07.06.2017 o 08:50, Dan Horák pisze: On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 06:42:21 +0200 Julian Sikorski wrote: Hi list, I have updated mame package

[HEADS UP] npth-1.5 is coming to Rawhide and F26 and chaning its license

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Pretty much nothing interesting (fixes for *BSD, MacOS and just fixes) apart from changing license from "LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+" to "LGPLv2+". """ We relax the license so that the software can be used by more projects. - wk (g10 Code CEO) """ - -- - -

Re: mame build OOMs on f24 and f25 i686, succeeds on other arches and branches

W dniu 07.06.2017 o 21:14, Björn 'besser82' Esser pisze: > Am 07.06.2017 um 20:21 schrieb Julian Sikorski: >> W dniu 07.06.2017 o 08:50, Dan Horák pisze: >>> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 06:42:21 +0200 >>> Julian Sikorski wrote: >>> Hi list, I have updated mame packages to 0.186 yesterday. Th

[HEADS UP] PythonQt 3.2 in Rawhide

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I'm going to update PythonQt to 3.2 which includes soname changes: libPythonQt.so.1 -> libPythonQt-Qt5-Python3.6.so.3 This is mostly done in upstream to support py2/py3 and qt4/qt5, although for now we will be building only py3/qt5 version. If you