Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out earlier today[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedo
On Mon, 22.05.17 19:36, Nikolai Kondrashov (nikolai.kondras...@redhat.com)
wrote:
> On 05/22/2017 04:46 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 22.05.17 14:11, Nikolai Kondrashov (nikolai.kondras...@redhat.com)
> > wrote:
> > > I'm trying to solve a problem of supplying locale settings to non-
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:45:32PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> >
>> > Is the infrastructure now ready for the respin?
>>
>> It appears the builds are still failing because of
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=144
>
> The bug
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:45:32PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> >
> > Is the infrastructure now ready for the respin?
>
> It appears the builds are still failing because of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=144
The bugzilla was addressed -- can we give
registry.fedoraproje
On Tue, 23 May 2017 09:30:14 +0300
Benson Muite wrote:
> Will this mean that repository builds will typically have poor
> performance to support portability?
Yes. In extreme cases, where the difference in performance is measurable,
the library may need to be modified to select a proper implemen
Hi,
Nils in your pull request to fix Ardour appdata
https://github.com/Ardour/ardour/pull/261
there's a comment by x42 that says it would break bundle-scripts,
'revision' is expected in the 2nd line.
So I modified your first commit to let revision stay in the 2nd line,
as Paul suggested in the PR.
On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 08:30, Benson Muite wrote:
> Will this mean that repository builds will typically have poor performance
> to support portability?
It depends on how much gain is there from enabling AVX instructions, but
yes, we have to disable any non-runtime-detected usage of instructio
23.05.2017 11:40 James Hogarth wrote:
>
>
> On 23 May 2017 at 09:17, Vascom wrote:
> > Yes, I am tried few days ago. He is not response.
> >
>
>
> Give him a time, life gets busy at times and we are but volunteers.
If you look at fab's list of packages [1] it's huge. And he
has updated some of t
OK. Thanks.
вт, 23 мая 2017 г. в 12:41, James Hogarth :
> On 23 May 2017 at 09:17, Vascom wrote:
> > Yes, I am tried few days ago. He is not response.
> >
>
>
> Give him a time, life gets busy at times and we are but volunteers.
>
> The process to follow for a nonresponsive maintainer is outline
On 23 May 2017 at 09:17, Vascom wrote:
> Yes, I am tried few days ago. He is not response.
>
Give him a time, life gets busy at times and we are but volunteers.
The process to follow for a nonresponsive maintainer is outlined here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_packag
Yes, I am tried few days ago. He is not response.
вт, 23 мая 2017 г. в 11:11, Björn 'besser82' Esser <
besse...@fedoraproject.org>:
> Am 23.05.2017 um 08:48 schrieb Vascom:
> > I am want co-maintain or admin package klavaro
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/klavaro/
> > And I
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 26 Branched 20170522.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_tes
Am 23.05.2017 um 08:48 schrieb Vascom:
I am want co-maintain or admin package klavaro
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/klavaro/
And I make request in pkgdb. But it's admin fab not response
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/fab/
What should I do?
Have tried to pi
Am 23.05.2017 um 07:00 schrieb Pete Zaitcev:
Hi, All:
I'm going to re-state the problem in short, but in case, URL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454543
- I maintain a library (liberasurecode)
- It contains a call to ceill() from -lm
- When Koji builds the code, something makes
14 matches
Mail list logo
