Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 25/116 (x86_64), 10/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170426.n.0):
ID: 91205 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-i
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 76/116 (x86_64), 21/23 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170502.n.0):
ID: 91396 Test: x86
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 26 Branched 20170504.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
vagrant-hostmanager has changed its license from MIT to MPLv2.0 with
version 1.8.6:
https://github.com/devopsgroup-io/vagrant-hostmanager/compare/v1.8.5...v1.8.6
Due to this, I only plan to release 1.8.6 on Rawhide[0].
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447820
signature.asc
Descr
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 19:51 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I have two packages which I got notifications that they were
> "ejected" from the push…
> Bodhi is giving me the option to push it to testing again but the
> koji tag is already showing f26-updates-testing...
This was due to a Bodhi mash ru
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 16:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > ID: 90236 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
> > URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/90236
>
> I was expecting this to be fixed with
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433560 , but it still
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 22/116 (x86_64), 11/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 90250 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedorap
On 22 April 2017 at 14:33, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Packager of 'xpra' package is inactive since some months and xpra is not
> updated yet.
>
> Does anyone know how to contact him?
>
> Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411006
An email usually does it ;)
Approved your AC
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-05-05 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below ca
On 2017-05-03 12:44, Christian Schaller wrote:
So just wanted everyone to know that we now have the go ahead to ship mp3
encoding in Fedora too. So anyone involved with packaging
mp3 encoders can now start migrating them to the Fedora repositories. We are
still in the process of evaluating othe
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Yesterday there was lengthy discussion on #fedora-releng about this. And
> this was my inquiry:
>
Ahh, thanks. My work blocks IRC but even if they didn't I don't have time
to hang out there.
Thanks,
Richard
___
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Christian Schaller
wrote:
> Hi, not sure why Spot hasn't chimed in, but yes this
> has been run through legal. Tom and I where on the same
> email thread with the laywers.
>
> I'm assuming it's because he's at RH Summit. He looked blissfully busy in
the pic I saw,
Hi, not sure why Spot hasn't chimed in, but yes this
has been run through legal. Tom and I where on the same
email thread with the laywers.
Of course on top of that the fact that they shut down the mp3licensing
operation is a pretty strong sign :)
Christian
- Original Message -
> From:
2017-05-04 1:16 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :
> This seems to be some kind of test issue, not setting the size of the
> /boot partition properly; the recent new version of anaconda might have
> changed the UI and stopped the test doing the right thing. If jsedlak
> doesn't look into this first, I'll
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Kate Carcia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have recently verified the list of candidates for F27. The link with the
> updated list is below.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/PriorityPipeline#Backlog
>
> We welcome any feedback you may have.
Since this
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:39:22PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> Hello all,
> On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
> Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
> Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
> out yesterday[2].
>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:03:48AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >
> > If we are building building images
> >
> > FROM fedora:25
> >
> > should we start using
> >
> > FROM registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25
> >
> > instead in
Yesterday there was lengthy discussion on #fedora-releng about this. And
this was my inquiry:
~~~
vondruchpvalena's vagrant-1.8.5-3.fc25 bodhi update was ejected from
the f25-updates-testing mash. Reason: "Cannot find relevant tag for
vagrant-1.8.5-3.fc25. None of ['f25-updates-testing',
'f2
18 matches
Mail list logo
