On 1 May 2017 at 14:42, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Tomasz, as I'm sure you know, our entire OS-creation infrastructure is
> built around RPM. Suggesting we switch to another system is an ENORMOUS
Seems you did not read what I wrote careful.
*I'm not suggesting switching to IPS.*
I've pointed on IPS
On 2017-04-27 09:13, Christine Freitas wrote:
Hello All,
We are pleased to announce Red Hat's Bugzilla 5 beta [1]! We’re inviting
all of you to participate.
We encourage you to test your current scripts against this new version
and take part in the beta discussions on the Fedora developmen
On 2 May 2017 at 09:36, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On 1 May 2017 at 22:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
If the intended benefit of this change remains unclear, it may help to
f
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 1 May 2017 at 22:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>> If the intended benefit of this change remains unclear, it may help to
>>> focus on a specific concrete case, which would be that th
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2017-05-02 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00
US/Eastern
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Work
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 69/116 (x86_64), 20/23 (i386)
ID: 89704 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedorapr
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 17/116 (x86_64), 8/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 89575 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedorapr
David Sommerseth wrote:
> This is actually just a very late heads-up about challenges with OpenVPN
> in Fedora 26.
>
> Fedora is moving towards OpenSSL v1.1, which is in my opinion a sane and
> good step forward. Unfortunately, that gives OpenVPN a real challenge.
Fyi, now that compat-openssl10
OLD: Fedora-26-20170430.n.0
NEW: Fedora-26-20170501.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 21
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.78 MiB
Size of dropped packages:132.30 KiB
Hi,
The 4.11 kernel was officially released last night. This kernel should
be showing up in a rawhide release in the next few days. F26 will also
get the final 4.11 update and then get the incremental stable updates
as they are released. F24/F25 will be rebased on the same schedule we
have in the
There will be an outage starting at 2017-05-04 06:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-05-04 06:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be applying updates a
There will be an outage starting at 2017-05-02 21:00UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date -d '2017-05-02 21:00 UTC
Reason for outage:
We will be applying updates and
Start Date: 2017-04-24 10:08:01.511647
End Date: 2017-05-01 10:08:01.511647
Remi Collet : 6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442469
php-psr-simple-cache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431365
php-phpdocumentor-type-resolver
https://bugzil
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 08:55:13AM +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 30 April 2017 at 15:33, David Sommerseth wrote:
> > Point us at some patches, git repos, .spec files, *whatever* which uses
> > your approach so we can see and get experience on how to resolve it.
> David I've already send few ti
On 1 May 2017 at 22:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> If the intended benefit of this change remains unclear, it may help to
>> focus on a specific concrete case, which would be that the following
>> operations should be completely indistingui
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 1 May 2017 at 09:59, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be more effective, more safe, and more efficient to
>> improve the existing support for doing "the right thing", rather than
>> trying to outsmart a build and deployment system
16 matches
Mail list logo
