On 04/19/2017 06:45 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
So to be clear about this... The OpenJDK9 packages won't have a provides of
"java" and the
alternatives system won't prioritise this package over OpenJDK8?
Hi!
Yes you are right. It will not provide java, nor java-devel. Nor it will provide jav
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2017-04-20 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2017-04-20 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2017-04-20 1
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 16/111 (x86_64), 5/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 83041 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/83041
ID: 83055 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https:/
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 17/109 (x86_64), 5/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170418.n.0):
ID: 83160 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/83160
ID: 83162 Test: x86_64 Serv
Hi Christian,
On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 21:14 +, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> I noticed that there is an empty directory /usr/src/debug/tmp on my
> system, which does not make much sense to me. `dnf
> provides /usr/src/debug/tmp` reveals, that this folder is provided by
> 50 (!) different debugin
Hi folks,
I noticed that there is an empty directory /usr/src/debug/tmp on my system,
which does not make much sense to me. `dnf provides /usr/src/debug/tmp`
reveals, that this folder is provided by 50 (!) different debuginfo
(sub-)packages (on Fedora 25). They are provided by these source pack
On 19 Apr 2017 1:14 pm, "Jan Kurik" wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Java 9 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java9TechPreview
Change owner(s):
* Jiri Vanek
Add a tech preview preview of the the upcoming version of Java
(OpenJDK9) to Fedora 27
== Detailed Description ==
The cu
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 19:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> fedora-obsolete-packages.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplac
> ing_Existing_Packages
OK, I filed this request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443614
Michael
_
Mercurial < 4.1.3 has a security issue, and an update is highly recommended
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-packaging/2017-April/000202.html
I propose to update f26 for 4.1.3.
torgoisehg 4.1.3 is (just now) also available.
It would be advisable to backport patches to earlier ver
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Java 9 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java9TechPreview
Change owner(s):
* Jiri Vanek
Add a tech preview preview of the the upcoming version of Java
(OpenJDK9) to Fedora 27
== Detailed Description ==
The current Java implementation in Fedora comes fro
Upstream is dead, nothing in current Fedora seems to use it.
I'll retire it next week unless someone wants to keep it (and will take
over the maintenance of the package).
Paul.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
11 matches
Mail list logo