Fedora 26 Alpha 1.5 compose check report

2017-03-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 6/96 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26 Alpha 1.3): ID: 72742 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://op

Fedora 26 Alpha 1.4 compose check report

2017-03-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/107 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 72438 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/72438 ID: 72479 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://open

[Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate Alpha-1.5 Available Now!

2017-03-28 Thread rawhide
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Alpha-1.5 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the c

Fedora 26-20170328.n.0 compose check report

2017-03-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Server boot i386 Passed openQA tests: 1/108 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an e

Re: automated packaging

2017-03-28 Thread Randy Barlow
On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 12:26 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > Or are these test failures expected to be delivered through FMN only? This is currently how they are handled. I have my FMN settings configured to send these to me over IRC and that works well for me. However, I don't believe that is the defau

Re: failed to open file (schemas/gschemas.compiled not found)

2017-03-28 Thread Jens Lody
Am Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:19:29 - schrieb "Martin Gansser" : > I am working on a review of gnome-shell-extension-netspeed > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377631). Upstream > Ticket: https://github.com/hedayaty/NetSpeed/issues/56 I'm using the > latest version of NetSpeed from the

Fedora Rawhide-20170328.n.0 compose check report

2017-03-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/107 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170327.n.0): ID: 71948 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/71948 ID: 72042 Test:

Re: How attached are we to branch ACLs? -- Should we kill pkgdb?

2017-03-28 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El vie, 24-03-2017 a las 19:37 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon escribió: > Hi everyone, > > As I am working on bringing pagure as a front-end to our dist-git, a > question is > troubling me. > > Currently ACLs are stored in pkgdb, it allows having a per-branch ACL > model, > which in itself is quite co

Re: a rawhide build not tagged into f27-build

2017-03-28 Thread David Tardon
Hi, On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 03:51:48PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > My build of updated poppler in Rawhide was not tagged into f27-build > > automatically, as it used to be in the past: > > > > $ koji wait-repo --build=`fedpkg verrel` f27-build > > Warning: nvr poppler-0.53.0-1.fc27 is not cur

Orphaning of ClamAV - EPEL BRANCH ONLY

2017-03-28 Thread Gerald B. Cox
I'm going to orphan the EPEL branch because I don't use EPEL and know nothing about it. I believe it would help with triage of the incoming EPEL bugzilla reports for them to go into a queue of someone who knows EPEL. I don't want to be responsible for them sitting as "NEW" - which is a whole othe

Re: Qt 5.8 coming to rawhide

2017-03-28 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: > Mostly fyi/heads-up, > > kde-sig members imported Qt 5.8 into git over the weekend (kudos to > heliocastro for initial packaging/copr and kkofler for merging import), > and > bootstrap builds are under way. I'm hoping to have the whole stack done > by tomorrow (Tue Mar 28).

Re: Orphaned Packages in branched (2017-03-26)

2017-03-28 Thread Rex Dieter
t...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > clucene09 orphan, group::kde-sig,0 weeks ago This one is triggering a bit of a false positive for anything depending on Qt(4). It should be solved with, https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1cf6f83c58 (pending f26-alph

Re: a rawhide build not tagged into f27-build

2017-03-28 Thread Peter Robinson
> My build of updated poppler in Rawhide was not tagged into f27-build > automatically, as it used to be in the past: > > $ koji wait-repo --build=`fedpkg verrel` f27-build > Warning: nvr poppler-0.53.0-1.fc27 is not current in tag f27-build > latest build in f27-build is poppler-0.52.0-1.fc26 >

a rawhide build not tagged into f27-build

2017-03-28 Thread David Tardon
Hi, My build of updated poppler in Rawhide was not tagged into f27-build automatically, as it used to be in the past: $ koji wait-repo --build=`fedpkg verrel` f27-build Warning: nvr poppler-0.53.0-1.fc27 is not current in tag f27-build latest build in f27-build is poppler-0.52.0-1.fc26 I had t

Re: Intent to retire fleet in F-27 (F-26?)

2017-03-28 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2017-03-14 12:07 GMT+01:00 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello All! > Upstream decided to abandon fleet in favor of Kubernetes: > > * https://coreos.com/blog/migrating-from-fleet-to-kubernetes.html > > I believe we should do the same and retire it. I'll mark it as retired > this weekend (18-19 March). ...and

Re: How to use COPR + Tito + dist-git?

2017-03-28 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 28.3.2017 v 15:14 Till Hofmann napsal(a): > I'm just packaging it, upstream sources are in a separate repository. > I'm basically trying to follow the same workflow as with regular Fedora > packages: Spec file in my repository, and a reference to an upstream > tarball in the repository (althoug

failed to open file (schemas/gschemas.compiled not found)

2017-03-28 Thread Martin Gansser
I am working on a review of gnome-shell-extension-netspeed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377631). Upstream Ticket: https://github.com/hedayaty/NetSpeed/issues/56 I'm using the latest version of NetSpeed from the extensions website, with GNOME 3.22, on Fedora 25 Workstation x86_64

Re: How to use COPR + Tito + dist-git?

2017-03-28 Thread Till Hofmann
On 28.03.2017 14:23, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 28.3.2017 v 10:40 Till Hofmann napsal(a): >> I'm playing around with Tito and COPR following [1,2]. It works great so >> far, but I'm still having problems with loading the sources to a >> lookaside cache. I've found a blog post that uses git-annex [

Re: How to use COPR + Tito + dist-git?

2017-03-28 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 28.3.2017 v 10:40 Till Hofmann napsal(a): > I'm playing around with Tito and COPR following [1,2]. It works great so > far, but I'm still having problems with loading the sources to a > lookaside cache. I've found a blog post that uses git-annex [3], but the > COPR builders do not have git-anne

bug report of fedmsg

2017-03-28 Thread Cătălin George Feștilă
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436656 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

How to use COPR + Tito + dist-git?

2017-03-28 Thread Till Hofmann
Hi all, I'm playing around with Tito and COPR following [1,2]. It works great so far, but I'm still having problems with loading the sources to a lookaside cache. I've found a blog post that uses git-annex [3], but the COPR builders do not have git-annex installed. According to another blog post [

Fedora 26 Alpha 1.3 compose check report

2017-03-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/107 (x86_64), 3/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26 Alpha 1.2): ID: 71577 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/71577 ID: 71587 Test: x86_64 Server-d