Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Server boot i386
Failed openQA tests: 10/108 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170320.n.0):
ID: 68397 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/68397
ID: 68422
Hi,
I have a ridicules bug with imake[1]. Could anybody help here?
Dmitrij
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429343
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject
> Does anyone know whether the fix for this problem is already in F25
> builds of FF or should a new build be prepared and pushed to fix this?
>
> See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433819
might as well use Google-Chrome , Least one doesnt have to WAIT a year or so
for a Update to
the fix was committed with this pull-request [0] due to the present
freeze things may be a bit delayed:
[0] https://pagure.io/fedora-repos/pull-request/28
Corey W Sheldon:
> This is a known issue the gpg key that is shipped in the
> fedora-repos-25-3.noarch has an temporary key that was killed,
This is a known issue the gpg key that is shipped in the
fedora-repos-25-3.noarch has an temporary key that was killed, work is
in progress to fix this, see
https://keys.fedoraproject.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x812A6B4B64DAB85D
curl the static key for this one and rpm --import it and try again.
Does anyone know whether the fix for this problem is already in F25
builds of FF or should a new build be prepared and pushed to fix this?
See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433819
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapro
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:21:25 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> Obviously this could be worked around using --nogpgcheck,
> but what does it mean?
[snip]
> 00:01
> warning:
> /var/cache/dnf/fedora-6dbd63560daef6bf/packages/glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686.rpm:
> Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, ke
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 20:48 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:58:06PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 19:40 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/107 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170320.n.0):
ID: 68233 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/68233
ID: 68256 Test: x86_6
Hi folks! Just wanted to let everyone know where we're at with the F26
Alpha.
An Alpha RC2 compose request is in, and RC2 should be building at
present. The main change between RC1 and RC2 is a fix for the problems
with gnome-initial-setup: it should now work properly if you don't
create a user du
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 15:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 20:48 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:58:06PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 19:40 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 20:48 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:58:06PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 19:40 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430297
> > >
> > > This has been going on for a few we
Obviously this could be worked around using --nogpgcheck,
but what does it mean?
Rich.
# dnf install /usr/lib/crt1.o --releasever=26 --best --allowerasing
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates', disabling.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree', disabli
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:58:06PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 19:40 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430297
> >
> > This has been going on for a few weeks with no attention. It prevents
> > anyone from running libguestfs
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 19:40 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430297
>
> This has been going on for a few weeks with no attention. It prevents
> anyone from running libguestfs on Fedora 26.
>
> It's (IMHO) pretty serious for anyone using virtualizati
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430297
This has been going on for a few weeks with no attention. It prevents
anyone from running libguestfs on Fedora 26.
It's (IMHO) pretty serious for anyone using virtualization: "kernel
doesn't boot on qemu" should be a blocker for a Fedora relea
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 26
Alpha.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 17:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
In the meantime, please keep also a
On 20 March 2017 at 14:43, Reindl Harald wrote:
> you should try to understand what you quote and refer to - this options is
> there *to break that compatibility which is otherwise implicit enabled*
>
Original claim which I've commented was about that Linux (kernel) does not
changes anything in
Hi,
On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James wrote:
I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
packagers will be available in the not too distant future, I will try
to debug this. Thanks for the information, Kevin.
This issu
(Resending without changes my reply which I've sent initially by mistake
only to Kamil. He suggest that it is worth to resend it :) )
On 20 March 2017 at 22:23, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > Even without above raw build logs preserved on koji enriched but full
> > warnings verbosity has some very big p
On 03/19/2017 07:17 PM, Olzhas Rakhimov wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> My name is Olzhas Rakhimov. I am an open-source enthusiast
> (https://github.com/rakhimov).
> I'd like to package https://github.com/rakhimov/scram
> The review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433686
>
>
I'm orphaning clucene09 for f26+.
Reasons being mostly that it's FTBFS (and bundling requirements have relaxed
since it's introduction).
-- Rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
> packagers will be available in the not too distant future, I will try
> to debug this. Thanks for the information, Kevin.
This issue is now blocking a large update of sagemath a
23 matches
Mail list logo
