Updating getdata to 0.10.0, which is a soname bump. Since it never rebuild
properly there are already broken deps. I'll clean up after it.
-me
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only l
enqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/60113#downloads
> Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/60811#downloads
The sudden increase in size here seems like an interesting result that
could bear looking into. I'll try and find a minute to do it if I can,
but anyone else could too,
> "JW" == Jonathan Wakely writes:
JW> The template at
JW>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#SPEC_templates_and_examples
JW> still shows %install cleaning the buildroot as the first step,
JW> should that be corrected?
There are probably any number of pages which the
Missing expected images:
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Server dvd i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 16/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170306.n.0):
ID: 60760 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https:
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Server boot i386
Failed openQA tests: 47/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170306.n.0):
ID: 60565 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/60565
Hello All!
I'm no longer using leveldb, so I'm no longer interested in
maintaining it. Does anyone want to become a primary maintainer?
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 26 Branched 20170307.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Ter, 2017-03-07 at 14:29 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > The Tags and Sections section of the main guidelines was modified
> > to
> > use "SHOULD" and "MUST" language throughout, and to either
> > discourage
> > or prohibit the use of certain tags and sections. The section is
> > short,
>
> The Tags and Sections section of the main guidelines was modified to
> use "SHOULD" and "MUST" language throughout, and to either discourage
> or prohibit the use of certain tags and sections. The section is short,
> so I've included it below.
>
> "
> * The Copyright:, Packager:, Vendor: and Pre
