On Feb 10, 2017 7:09 PM, "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
Justin Forbes wrote:
> * AGREED: Allow the update, encourage everyone to work through the
> process better next time (7,0,0) (jforbes, 16:51:10)
The context:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1675
#1675 Libglvnd update breaking F25
is missing the
Justin Forbes wrote:
> * AGREED: Allow the update, encourage everyone to work through the
> process better next time (7,0,0) (jforbes, 16:51:10)
The context:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1675
#1675 Libglvnd update breaking F25
is missing there.
This is essentially giving the GNOME develop
On Feb 10, 2017 16:27, "Chris Murphy" wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Chris
Nope. The monitoring works with dmeventd, but I'm not sure how
sophisticated the monitoring is or what messaging method it uses
(dbus?) or what monitors it (udisksd or storaged?). But again, the
loss of email no
> Il 10/02/2017 20:11, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
> No,
>
> ln -sf ../java/MediathekView/MediathekView.jar
> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/Mediathek
> ln -sf %{_javadir}/jackson-core.jar %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/Mediathek
MediathekView.jar do not exists, and can't be linked,
> check if these are corr
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 08:49:40AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Something went wrong with signing this package and we aren't sure what
> yet. When I looked at it yesterday it looked like it was signing part
> of it, but then it didn't seem to progress. I also tried retagging
> things so the autosign
Missing expected images:
Xfce live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/11 (x86_64)
ID: 56785 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/56785
Passed openQA tests: 10/11 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Justin Forbes said:
>> * AGREED: Discussion on anaconda LVM change is delayed until 2-17
>> provided open questions get answered (+1:6,0:0,-1:0) (jforbes,
>> 17:24:33)
>
> So, not sure if this is in the "open ques
Il 10/02/2017 20:11, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
Il 10/02/2017 16:25, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
usually a noarch application live in usr/share/[NAME]
all (optional/required) java libraries should be linked in usr/share/[NAME]
you mean, replace %{_javadir} with %{_datadir} ?
No,
ln -sf ../j
Once upon a time, Justin Forbes said:
> * AGREED: Discussion on anaconda LVM change is delayed until 2-17
> provided open questions get answered (+1:6,0:0,-1:0) (jforbes,
> 17:24:33)
So, not sure if this is in the "open questions", but on the mailing list
I brought up the fact that MD
> Il 10/02/2017 16:25, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
>
> usually a noarch application live in usr/share/[NAME]
> all (optional/required) java libraries should be linked in usr/share/[NAME]
you mean, replace %{_javadir} with %{_datadir} ?
> Please, remove:
> all bundle libraries ( swingx*.jar, jacks
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-02-10)
===
Meeting started by jforbes at 16:00:31 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-02-10/fesco.2017-02-10-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On 10/02/17 12:04 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:49:10AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 10/02/17 10:27 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:30:51AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>Because all packages for Rawhide are signed now? Not sure where/h
On 02/07/2017 01:22 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 13:08 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 7.2.2017 v 11:32 Michal Cyprian napsal(a):
Ruby on Fedora uses /usr/local/share/gems/ for packages installed
as a root via gem tool for many years.
Since you refer to Ruby, I just want to h
Il 10/02/2017 16:25, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
please use:
%files -f .mfiles
%doc res/README.txt
%license src/main/resources/MSearch-LICENSE.txt
%files javadoc -f .mfiles-javadoc
%license src/main/resources/MSearch-LICENSE.txt
rpm spec-file changed and uploaded.
I am working now on the rp
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:04:50 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:49:10AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 10/02/17 10:27 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:30:51AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >>Because all packages for Rawhide are
> please use:
>
> %files -f .mfiles
> %doc res/README.txt
> %license src/main/resources/MSearch-LICENSE.txt
>
> %files javadoc -f .mfiles-javadoc
> %license src/main/resources/MSearch-LICENSE.txt
>
rpm spec-file changed and uploaded.
I am working now on the rpm package for MediaMediathekView
ht
Hi,
I am working on a rpm package for MediathekView and need some tips for
optimizing the rpm spec file.
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/MediathekView/MediathekView.spec
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/MediathekView/MediathekView-13.0.1-1.fc25.src.rpm
__
please use:
%files -f .mfiles
%doc res/README.txt
%license src/main/resources/MSearch-LICENSE.txt
%files javadoc -f .mfiles-javadoc
%license src/main/resources/MSearch-LICENSE.txt
Il 10/02/2017 14:40, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
new rpm spec-file:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/Med
new rpm spec-file:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/MediathekView/MSearch.spec
many thanks for your help.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Il 10/02/2017 13:12, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
Il 10/02/2017 09:14, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
is not necessary
please, use:
for file in src/main/java/mSearch/tool/FileSize.java
do
native2ascii -encoding UTF8 ${file} ${file}
done
try with the above solution if there are not file with the
> Il 10/02/2017 09:14, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
> is not necessary
> please, use:
>
> for file in src/main/java/mSearch/tool/FileSize.java
> do
> native2ascii -encoding UTF8 ${file} ${file}
> done
>
> try with the above solution if there are not file with the same problem
> and report to upst
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:49:10AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 10/02/17 10:27 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:30:51AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>Because all packages for Rawhide are signed now? Not sure where/how this
> >>was communicated ...
> >
> >Can this
On 10/02/17 10:27 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:30:51AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Because all packages for Rawhide are signed now? Not sure where/how this
was communicated ...
Can this be short-circuited for packages going into Koji? It seems
like this will great
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:27:53AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:30:51AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 10.2.2017 v 10:06 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:02:11AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >> Yesterday around 4pm UTC +-
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:30:51AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 10.2.2017 v 10:06 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:02:11AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Yesterday around 4pm UTC +- I was told:
> >>
> >>> nirikit's currently trying to sign the 1.1GB ceph-deb
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:50:57AM +0100, Filip Szymański wrote:
> - python-epub
I am taking this one
--
Athos Ribeiro
http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@l
Il 10/02/2017 09:14, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
I have now changed the following parts:
prep
%setup -qn %{name}-%{version}
find . -name "*.jar" -delete
is not necessary
# fix non ASCII chars
for file in $( find src/main/java/mSearch -name *.java ) ; do
native2ascii -encoding UTF8 ${file}
Dne 10.2.2017 v 10:06 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:02:11AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Yesterday around 4pm UTC +- I was told:
>>
>>> nirikit's currently trying to sign the 1.1GB ceph-debuginfo for
>> aarch64
>>
>> but I'd say it is stuck somewhere
> But th
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:02:11AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Yesterday around 4pm UTC +- I was told:
>
> > nirikit's currently trying to sign the 1.1GB ceph-debuginfo for
> aarch64
>
> but I'd say it is stuck somewhere
But this is for Koji builds. Why do the packages need to be signe
Yesterday around 4pm UTC +- I was told:
> nirikit's currently trying to sign the 1.1GB ceph-debuginfo for
aarch64
but I'd say it is stuck somewhere
V.
Dne 10.2.2017 v 09:41 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17707485
>
> The error is
Due to lack of time (new job and personal stuff) I have to orphan a few
packages.
I hope that they find a new home:
- catimg
- hstr
- python-ansicolor
- python-epub
Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17707485
The error is:
DEBUG util.py:435: Error: nothing provides
libboost_system.so.1.60.0()(64bit) needed by librbd1-1:10.2.5-1.fc26.x86_64
This is fixed by a new ceph build which was completed yesterday
morning:
https://koji.fedora
I have now changed the following parts:
prep
%setup -qn %{name}-%{version}
find . -name "*.jar" -delete
# fix non ASCII chars
for file in $( find src/main/java/mSearch -name *.java ) ; do
native2ascii -encoding UTF8 ${file} ${file}
done
# fix "groupId must be specified"
echo 'group = "de.media
33 matches
Mail list logo
