On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Didier Fabert
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm unable to build netdata package for f26 on copr. The error, in file
> root.log.gz, was about pkgconfig:
> > Error: package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.2.1-1.fc26.x86_64 conflicts with
> pkgconfig < 1:0.29.1-2 provided by pkgconfig
On 02/03/2017 08:42 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Also what are the risks of enabling this?
It makes it possible for an attacker to distinguish used and unused
space on the disk, as they can see zeros instead of encrypted noise.
Whether that's a problem depends on your level of paranoia.
_
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Dne 3.2.2017 v 18:23 Chris Murphy napsal(a):
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>>
>>> Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
Further I wonder if /etc/lvm/lvm.conf needs
issue_discards = 1
Bot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-02-03)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:00:04 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-02-03/fes
Dne 3.2.2017 v 18:23 Chris Murphy napsal(a):
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
Further I wonder if /etc/lvm/lvm.conf needs
issue_discards = 1
Both / and /home are actually LV's which are made from the LUKS PV. So
trim pass down from dmcr
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
>> Further I wonder if /etc/lvm/lvm.conf needs
>> issue_discards = 1
>>
>> Both / and /home are actually LV's which are made from the LUKS PV. So
>> trim pass down from dmcrypt to block device isn't enough
Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
> Further I wonder if /etc/lvm/lvm.conf needs
> issue_discards = 1
>
> Both / and /home are actually LV's which are made from the LUKS PV. So
> trim pass down from dmcrypt to block device isn't enough to do
> anything.
LVM passes discards through automaticall
Further I wonder if /etc/lvm/lvm.conf needs
issue_discards = 1
Both / and /home are actually LV's which are made from the LUKS PV. So
trim pass down from dmcrypt to block device isn't enough to do
anything.
ext4 (discard mount option or fstrim.service) -> LVM (issue_discards=1
in lvm.conf) -> dmc
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:38:35AM -0500, Tim Fenn wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Dne 2.2.2017 v 17:14 Tim Fenn napsal(a):
> >
> > I recently requested and had received approval of a re-review of a package
> > I'm unretiring:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.red
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:25:07AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 09:40 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Jan Kurik
>> > wrote:
>> > > = System Wide Change: Enable TRIM pass down to enc
On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 17:32 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > So I've got multiple systems with encrypted partitions on SSD
> > disks.
> > Are there ways of enabling this for pre-existing partitions?
>
> I believe putting “discard” at the the of each line in
> /etc/crypttab
> will do the trick.
Ni
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:25:07AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 09:40 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Jan Kurik
> > wrote:
> > > = System Wide Change: Enable TRIM pass down to encrypted disks =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes
On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 09:40 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Jan Kurik
> wrote:
> > = System Wide Change: Enable TRIM pass down to encrypted disks =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableTrimOnDmCrypt
> >
> > Change owner(s):
> > * Vratislav Podzimek
> > *
Okay, creating a script:
#!/bin/sh
if [ -x /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-requires ] ; then
FINDREQ=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-requires
else
FINDREQ=/usr/lib/rpm/find-requires
fi
$FINDREQ $*
case `uname -m` in
*64)
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 61/96 (x86_64), 9/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170131.n.1):
ID: 56089 Test:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:51:28PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:45:08PM +, David Howells wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > gcc and cross-gcc currently dynamically load the isl-0.14 shared library -
> > which means that rpm-build doesn't automagically detect a:
> >
> >
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> See the section "requires filtering"
>
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies
>
> instead of filtering you'd be augmenting, but that's fine.
This scriptlet would seem to be inconsistent with the way find-requires works:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> What's wrong with doing:
>
> Requires: isl%{?_isa} >= %{isl_version}
>
> Other than you'll have to be aware and deal with any eventual soname bump, of
> course.
They bumped it somewhere between isl-0.14 (which gcc uses now) and isl-0.16.1
(which gcc wants to use).
D
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> This should be fixed in the libguestfs-1.34.4-2.fc25 package, so try
> that (in updates-testing currently).
Thank you, I ran a few tests and left karma.
Something weird about the debug kernel: On a Phenom II system, after
booting with t
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:45:08PM +, David Howells wrote:
> Hi,
>
> gcc and cross-gcc currently dynamically load the isl-0.14 shared library -
> which means that rpm-build doesn't automagically detect a:
>
> libisl.so.13()(64bit)
>
> but, rather, the gcc binary rpm must include a:
>
On 02/03/2017 09:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Hi,
>
> gcc and cross-gcc currently dynamically load the isl-0.14 shared library -
> which means that rpm-build doesn't automagically detect a:
>
> libisl.so.13()(64bit)
>
> but, rather, the gcc binary rpm must include a:
>
> Requires:
Hello Everybody,
The list will be published on the Fedora Magazine and the community today, 8:00
UTC and 7:00 UTC respectively,
Many thanks for the help :)
Best Regards
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em
Hi,
Why not using Yumex DNF? It does have support for group install and
it's very light and fast. Also is easier to find packages in it.
Just a suggestion.
Cheers, Sylvia
On 02/02/17 12:13, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 02/01/2017 10:34
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 2.2.2017 v 17:14 Tim Fenn napsal(a):
>
> I recently requested and had received approval of a re-review of a package
> I'm unretiring:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
>
> However, I don't have TICKET_CREATE privil
Hi,
gcc and cross-gcc currently dynamically load the isl-0.14 shared library -
which means that rpm-build doesn't automagically detect a:
libisl.so.13()(64bit)
but, rather, the gcc binary rpm must include a:
Requires: isl = %{isl_version}
clause.
Is it possible to instead do s
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = System Wide Change: Enable TRIM pass down to encrypted disks =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableTrimOnDmCrypt
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Vratislav Podzimek
> * Ondrej Kozina
>
>
> Override kernel default for dm-crypt mappings of
Hello Everybody,
The list will be published on the Fedora Magazine and the community
today, 8:00 UTC and 7:00 UTC respectively,
Many thanks for the help :)
Best Regards
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
I apologize but I won't be able to attend today's meeting. I'm in an
all-day training class. I'll comment on the tickets on today's agenda.
-Jared
On Feb 3, 2017 8:49 AM, "Stephen Gallagher" wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UT
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-02-03 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below ca
On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 12:07 +0100, Didier Fabert wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm unable to build netdata package for f26 on copr. The error, in file
> root.log.gz, was about pkgconfig:
> > Error: package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.2.1-1.fc26.x86_64 conflicts with
>
> pkgconfig < 1:0.29.1-2 provided by pkg
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 01:43:19AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Besides hiding the debug kernel in GRUB, is there a way to get rid of
> it, without uninstalling libguestfs?
This should be fixed in the libguestfs-1.34.4-2.fc25 package, so try
that (in updates-testing currently).
Rich.
--
Hi there,
I'm unable to build netdata package for f26 on copr. The error, in file
root.log.gz, was about pkgconfig:
> Error: package pkgconf-pkg-config-1.2.1-1.fc26.x86_64 conflicts with
pkgconfig < 1:0.29.1-2 provided by pkgconfig-1:0.29.1-1.fc25.x86_64
Yes, pkgconfig is explicitly mark as Bui
Dne 2.2.2017 v 17:14 Tim Fenn napsal(a):
> I recently requested and had received approval of a re-review of a
> package I'm unretiring:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
>
> However, I don't have TICKET_CREATE privileges on rel-eng trac to make
> the unretire request. How sh
33 matches
Mail list logo
