>> >>> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was:
>> >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112
>> >>>
>> >>> Re-submitting it 4 minutes later passed just fine:
>> >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004125
>> >> These builds were ran on different
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Jonathan Underwood
wrote:
>
>
> On 22 Dec 2016 06:12, "Peter Robinson" wrote:
>
> Just a heads up that xapian 1.4 is headed to rawhide.
>
>
> Do you plan to rebuild dependent packages?
Should all be done now.
___
devel
On 12/25/2016 6:41 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 15:06:03 -0500, David Muse wrote:
Oh, I just realized that there's an rpmdiff tool.
Mentioned in your original mail. ;-)
Well, I tried that,
and the only difference it shows is the timestamp for each file, which I
would expe
On Sun, 2016-12-25 at 16:25 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
> Atomic qcow2 x86_64
> Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
> Failed openQA tests: 14/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> New failures (same test did not fai
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 14/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161224.n.1):
ID: 52376 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso deskto
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 26 Rawhide 20161225.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 22/12/16 13:13, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 21/12/16 16:04, Dan Horák wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:03:49 +0100
>> Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> where is documented what system/hw is used on (primary) Koji builders?
>>> I'm interested in memory, storage, filesystem, host operatin
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 15:06:03 -0500, David Muse wrote:
> Oh, I just realized that there's an rpmdiff tool.
Mentioned in your original mail. ;-)
> Well, I tried that,
> and the only difference it shows is the timestamp for each file, which I
> would expect to be different. An rpmdiff -iT of the
Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> My proposal is to change the hunspell source packages to provide this
> additional file. This could be done just adding the file to the current
> package or to make the hunspell source package to provide one additional
> package (called vim-hunspell-XX) with the add
Hi,
I opened a bug [0] few days ago, since I was not able to find any VI
SPLs (spellcheck files) for languages outside English in the Fedora
repos.
Initially I thought it was a 'vi' problem, but thanks to Karsten, I
understood that it's not.
I guess the basic problem is that 'vi' does not provides
On 22 Dec 2016 06:12, "Peter Robinson" wrote:
Just a heads up that xapian 1.4 is headed to rawhide.
Do you plan to rebuild dependent packages?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 20/80 (x86_64), 4/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhi
12 matches
Mail list logo
