Il 12/12/2016 05:20, Chenxiong Qi ha scritto:
hi
i get:
aesh]$ fedpkg build
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyrpkg/__init__.py:314:
DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of
Python 2.6
for (_, _, ssl_reason) in error.message:
You might want to run fedora-packager-setu
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 10/80 (x86_64), 1/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161211.n.0):
ID: 51305 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ext4
URL: https:/
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 26 Rawhide 20161214.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:17:01PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Indeed, almost all the containers, app bundles etc. out there are
> outright illegal, because they just repackage a random distro's
> packages without including the corresponding SRPMs or equivalent. The
> full corresponding sources wo
Florian Weimer wrote:
> But these packaging systems produce source and binary packages at the
> same time. In contrast, I have yet to encounter a container build
> service which does that. This has the side effect that GPL compliance
> and general availability of matching source code is rather po
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 13:25 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 08:20 +1100, Timothy Ward wrote:
> > Is there a current problem with gdm setting a X session or Wayland
> > session as on login with Gdm setting Gnome or Gnome on Xorg still
> > ends
> > in an X session.
> >
> > Conf
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Scott Schmit wrote:
IPsec requires AF_NETLINK (NETLINK_XFRM) to manage the security
associations & security policies. libreswan probably also needs to be
able to manage the routing for IPsec tunnels (NETLINK_ROUTE[6]).
The nature of libreswan is that it allows custom "upd
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> You're right, it's better :)
If you define "better" as larger download, higher use of RAM and disk space,
less system integration, fewer and less timely security fixes and other
bugfixes, etc., then yes, Flatpak is "better". ^^
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bun
Missing expected images:
Lxde live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/22 (x86_64)
ID: 51209 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/51209
ID: 51224 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openq
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2016-12-08 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2016-12-15 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2016-12-15 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2016-12-15 1
On 12/14/2016 03:29 AM, Martin Ueding wrote:
> How could I diagnose this regressions? There are no issues in
> `journalctl -f` whenever there is a short lag. Any log that might help?
Could it be something to do with dbus? Do all of these actions make
messages appear in dbus-monitor? I've noticed a
On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 20:54 +0100, Ms Sanchez wrote:
> Hey!
>
> This link:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_packagen
> doesn't work. It returns a message saying there is no text. :-(
It's got a stray 'n' on the end. Remove that.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Commun
Hey!
This link:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_packagen
doesn't work. It returns a message saying there is no text. :-(
Thanks, Sylvia
On 13/12/16 21:17, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 12/13/2016 03:00 PM, Ms Sanchez wrote:
To be honest I looked at wikis and s
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:00:35PM +0100, Ms Sanchez wrote:
> To be honest I looked at wikis and so, but I'm still rather confused, I
> don't know really where or how to start. Why do I want to start packaging?
> Well, I want to keep contributing to Fedora but more into development. As I
> kn
On 12/14/2016 11:40 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:21:37 -0500
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> On 12/14/2016 09:19 AM, Dave Love wrote:
>>> Kevin Fenzi writes:
>>>
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:36:06 +
Dave Love wrote:
> Simo Sorce writes:
>
>> I
+1 that.
Keep the app not found, but add a help out Fedora section.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016, 12:38 Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi Sylvia,
>
> Just wondering, what were the places you were looking at to find the
> information how to start maintaining package in Fedora. Or what is the
> reason you want to
On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 09:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 12:19 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > However, default Fedora 25 configuration[1] does not set the default ccache
> > name to a collection, only FreeIPA client installer does this.
>
> Could we change that?
Neve
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 18:52 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 13/12/16 18:19, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 14:36 +, Dave Love wrote:
> > > Simo Sorce writes:
> > >
> > > > If you really need to automate it because typing a password is too hard:
> > > > cat ~/.mykrbpassword | kinit
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 12:19 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> However, default Fedora 25 configuration[1] does not set the default ccache
> name to a collection, only FreeIPA client installer does this.
Could we change that?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: Adam
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 13:23 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > krb5-auth-dialog directly uses krb5 API, not GSSAPI, so your only
> > choice with it is to use 'kswitch' utility to explicitly switch
> > credential cache prior to use of the krb5-auth-dialog.
>
> thanks for the explanation
This looks a lot
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 12/14/2016 05:55 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> I disagree with this assertion. Flatpak, snappy, docker containers,
>> etc are not an indication people are giving up on Free Software. They
>> are a mechanism the focuses on easing a develop
On 12/14/2016 05:55 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I disagree with this assertion. Flatpak, snappy, docker containers,
etc are not an indication people are giving up on Free Software. They
are a mechanism the focuses on easing a developer's ability to
distribute their software without worrying about le
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Christian Schaller
> wrote:
>> That is not 100% correct. You can make a non-sandboxed Flatpak and
>> it would work just as well as an RPM in terms of hardware access.
>> Enabling sandboxing however would need
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:40:20 +
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to
> > the
> > following package versions (some may be in testing as of this
> > email):
> >
> > python-
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:25:07 +
Dave Love wrote:
> Simo Sorce writes:
>
> > But I am not sure why you would need to forward your user
> > credentials to servers normally. Did you copy your certs everywhere
> > before ? I would think the normal case is that people have 1
> > development machi
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:21:50 +0200
Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> I cannot tell of how Fedora Infrastructure would use features
> available in FreeIPA, but at least on FreeIPA level we have support
> for multi-factor authentication on Kerberos level.
>
> The use of it is a bit less convenient right
That is a lot of different things mashed into one here, and while
I can not even begin to understand how you can bash our commitment to
Free Software and at the same time be an argent backer of
Shuttleworths Snappy is beyond me, but I am sure is somehow makes sense
to you.
Also I don't think it i
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:21:37 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 12/14/2016 09:19 AM, Dave Love wrote:
> > Kevin Fenzi writes:
> >
> >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:36:06 +
> >> Dave Love wrote:
> >>
> >>> Simo Sorce writes:
> >>>
> If you really need to automate it because typing a
- Original Message -
> From: "Randy Barlow"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 5:45:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes
>
> On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 14:33 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > First, I'll note you don't need to get
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Christian Schaller
wrote:
> That is not 100% correct. You can make a non-sandboxed Flatpak and
> it would work just as well as an RPM in terms of hardware access.
> Enabling sandboxing however would need some thought and development
> for a lot of such application
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:27:36AM -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:
> That is not 100% correct. You can make a non-sandboxed Flatpak and
> it would work just as well as an RPM in terms of hardware access.
> Enabling sandboxing however would need some thought and development
> for a lot of such app
That is not 100% correct. You can make a non-sandboxed Flatpak and
it would work just as well as an RPM in terms of hardware access.
Enabling sandboxing however would need some thought and development
for a lot of such applications, but we are slowly but surely working
on it through things like th
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> You're right, it's better :)
>
Not really. Flatpak is incredibly limited in its abilities.
Applications that interface with hardware directly are out of the
question, for example. That means lots of pro-AV applications simply
won't work pr
Dne 13.12.2016 v 22:40 David Woodhouse napsal(a):
> On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to
>> the
>> following package versions (some may be in testing as of this email):
>>
>> python-cccolutils-1.4-1
>
You're right, it's better :)
- Original Message -
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > I would advise you to look into packaging your application using Flatpak:
> > http://flatpak.org/
> > so that you can package your application for both Fedora, and every other
> > distribution out there that has
Simo Sorce writes:
> The krb5.conf is interchangeable if you use a subset of directives
> common to both, this directive is not common to both, therefore it is
> incompatible with Heimdal.
Obviously; sorry I pointed it out.
> Samba has been ported to MIT Kerberos for Fedora uses, and the abilit
Simo Sorce writes:
> But I am not sure why you would need to forward your user credentials to
> servers normally. Did you copy your certs everywhere before ? I would
> think the normal case is that people have 1 development machine where
> they handle packaging.
Some people use "Enterprise Linux
On 12/14/2016 09:19 AM, Dave Love wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi writes:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:36:06 +
>> Dave Love wrote:
>>
>>> Simo Sorce writes:
>>>
If you really need to automate it because typing a password is too
hard: cat ~/.mykrbpassword | kinit myusername
>>>
>>> It needs
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:36:06 +
> Dave Love wrote:
>
>> Simo Sorce writes:
>>
>> > If you really need to automate it because typing a password is too
>> > hard: cat ~/.mykrbpassword | kinit myusername
>>
>> It needs to be automated principally because the password i
Hello everyone,
Python 3.6 release candidate 1 is now residing in rawhide (or more specifically
at f26-python3 sidetag). A lot of packages have been rebuilt
at the side tag and for the rest, a ticket for a targeted rebuild has been
filled [0].
As soon as the targeted rebuild happens, I will ask
Martin Kolman wrote:
> Is the way livemedia-creator that different from livecd-tools ? Or
> harder to use ?
livemedia-creator is just a wrapper around Anaconda and is thus limited by
what Anaconda can do. In particular, it does not support a persistent
package cache. You have to jump through big
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I would advise you to look into packaging your application using Flatpak:
> http://flatpak.org/
> so that you can package your application for both Fedora, and every other
> distribution out there that has Flatpak available to it.
That is no replacement for a native RPM pac
Dne 13.12.2016 v 21:00 Ms Sanchez napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On 12/12/16 13:38, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sylvia,
>>
>> Just wondering, what were the places you were looking at to find the
>> information how to start maintaining package in Fedora. Or what is
>> the reason you want to package something
On 03.12.2016 13:50, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> So apparently yubico-piv-tool ships $libdir/libykpkcs11.so*, but this
> doesn't get picked up by p11-kit by default. I suspect it has gone
> unnoticed largely because for most crucial operations the opensc
> module also works with Yubikeys. However,
On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 12:12 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
> wrote:
> > Any idea on why this happens when attempting to build in rawhide?
> > Is
> > the buildroot broken?
>
> You need to update fedpkg/pyrpkg.
The version from updates-testi
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 10:08 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
> The first one GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 769204 says:
> Status: RESOLVED NOTGNOME
Hi,
yes, that's correct, there was a problem in the gpg/gpg2, not in the
evolution-data-server as such. Please read through it for some pointers
into
I have upgraded my Fedora installation from 24 to 25. Since then, things
that were done instantly before *sometimes* take half a second now.
Examples are:
- Switching the workspace in Awesome WM
- Typing something into the terminal (Konsole, fish shell)
- Pasting with the mousewheel (e.g. into Fre
Hey Joel,
- Original Message -
> Hi all
>
> My name is Joël Krähemann. I maintain Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer and I'd
> like to provide it in fedora. Linux is my OS of choice since 2001.
> Along the time I have used many distributions like debian, linux from
> scratch, SUSE, fedora and a few
On ke, 14 joulu 2016, Petr Mensik wrote:
That sounds like way to use (sort of) certificates again. With updated
realmd package I can now save fedora account password into Gnome
keyring. But...
I thought about it yesterday, but did not dare to ask. Are not password
less strong kind of authenticat
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:00:06 +0100
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> Any idea on why this happens when attempting to build in rawhide? Is
> the buildroot broken?
>
> $ fedpkg build
> error: line 6: Illegal char '-' (0x2d) in: Release: 3.fc26-pending
> error: query of specfile /home/.../fedora/gnu
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
> Any idea on why this happens when attempting to build in rawhide? Is
> the buildroot broken?
You need to update fedpkg/pyrpkg.
>
> $ fedpkg build
> error: line 6: Illegal char '-' (0x2d) in: Release: 3.fc26-pending
> error: query o
Any idea on why this happens when attempting to build in rawhide? Is
the buildroot broken?
$ fedpkg build
error: line 6: Illegal char '-' (0x2d) in: Release: 3.fc26-pending
error: query of specfile /home/.../fedora/gnutls/gnutls.spec failed,
can't parse
The line in question has:
Release: 3%{?dist
That sounds like way to use (sort of) certificates again. With updated realmd
package I can now save fedora account password into Gnome keyring. But...
I thought about it yesterday, but did not dare to ask. Are not password less
strong kind of authentication that keys? We have SSH keys, we had g
On ke, 14 joulu 2016, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 13.12.2016 22:57, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 13/12/16 21:32, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 18:52 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
The main goal of long random passwords after all is about a combination
of making them hard to brute force and ensuring tha
On ti, 13 joulu 2016, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to
the
following package versions (some may be in testing as of this email):
python-cccolutils-1.4-1
fedpkg-1.26-2
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:08:33AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > The original RFCs for IPv6 mandated support for IPsec, but that's no
> > longer required as of RFC 6434. Nothing else popped out at me as
> > necessary for IPv6, but it's probably a moot point given XFRM.
>
> IPv6 people argue th
On 12/14/2016 07:44 AM, Scott Schmit wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 05:54:54PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 12/13/2016 12:17 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 12.12.16 21:22, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote:
For us (libreswan) it probably makes less sense to restrict address
family
57 matches
Mail list logo
