Re: trying to install dictd-server and...

On 12/11/2016 08:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I'd instead suggest taking a look at docs: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/25/html-single/SELinux_Users_and_Administrators_Guide/index.html#sect-Security-Enhanced_Linux-Troubleshooting-Fixing_Problems and then filing a selinux-policy bug so

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Il 12/12/2016 05:20, Chenxiong Qi ha scritto: hi i get: aesh]$ fedpkg build /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyrpkg/__init__.py:314: DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of Python 2.6 for (_, _, ssl_reason) in error.message: You might want to run fedora-packager-se

Re: trying to install dictd-server and...

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 23:03:43 +0100 Kevin Kofler wrote: > stevefoley12...@gmail.com wrote: > > Well, I must say, Fedora is not making it easy! I've used Debian > > for a few years and I really expect to install something and have > > it work. > > > > But...there are selinux issues, I guess. I rea

Re: Koji update to Kerberos problem

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 22:41:19 +0100 Michal Schorm wrote: > > You have two accounts? Or you mean you tested with someone elses > > account and got a Password prompt, but not your own? > > I have only one account. > I used someone else's username to prove, I got right configuration. > > > In any

Re: out of space on some builders

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:55:31 +0100 Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Dec 11, 2016 2:53 PM, "Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk" < > puiterw...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Looks like there are problems on some builders: > > Then reporting koji errors, it would be great if you could attach the > task link >

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On 12/12/2016 08:58 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Greetings. As previously announced, releng has made a number of changes as part of it's 2016 "flag day". All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to the following package

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On 12/12/2016 11:22 AM, gil wrote: Il 12/12/2016 04:07, Mike McLean ha scritto: Success here. Possible gotchas, depending on setup: 1) make sure your krb5.conf has: includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/ 2) if you have any custom koji config, you might need to adjust that. You need the some of the

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 09:08:56 +0700 "Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich" wrote: > > * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos > > authentication > > instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: > > > > kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedoraaproject.org > > > $ kinit kr...@fedorapr

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 8:35 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos > > authentication > > instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: > > > > kinit your-fas-accountn...

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

1. I've long been a fan of rolling releases; it's only the fear of having to rebuild my workstation / laptop occasionally that keeps me from running Rawhide by default. 2. I don't think it's the release schedule that impacts Fedora's popularity relative to Ubuntu. Ubuntu is popular because thir

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Il 12/12/2016 04:07, Mike McLean ha scritto: Success here. Possible gotchas, depending on setup: 1) make sure your krb5.conf has: includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/ 2) if you have any custom koji config, you might need to adjust that. You need the some of the updated settings from koji.conf in the

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Success here. Possible gotchas, depending on setup: 1) make sure your krb5.conf has: includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/ 2) if you have any custom koji config, you might need to adjust that. You need the some of the updated settings from koji.conf in the latest koji build. On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 9:46

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Well. Somehow it works now. 12.12.2016 09:08, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich пишет: * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos authentication instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedoraaproject.org $ kinit kr...@fedoraproject.org ki

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Il 12/12/2016 03:08, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich ha scritto: * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos authentication instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedoraaproject.org $ kinit kr...@fedoraproject.org kinit: Client 'kr...@f

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

hi, i have the same problem regards Il 12/12/2016 03:18, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich ha scritto: Here is debug info: $ KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stdout kinit kr...@fedoraproject.org [14820] 1481508960.831584: Getting initial credentials for kr...@fedoraproject.org [14820] 1481508960.831767: Sending reques

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Here is debug info: $ KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stdout kinit kr...@fedoraproject.org [14820] 1481508960.831584: Getting initial credentials for kr...@fedoraproject.org [14820] 1481508960.831767: Sending request (196 bytes) to FEDORAPROJECT.org [14820] 1481508960.834886: Resolving hostname id.fedoraproje

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

On Dec 11, 2016 9:00 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:22:44PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> repo data). The full list makes up most of the 40Mb downloaded. The >>

[Test-Announce] 2016-12-12 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2016-12-12 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again tomorrow! Nothing huge on the agenda, but this might be the last time to meet

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

* koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos authentication instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedoraaproject.org $ kinit kr...@fedoraproject.org kinit: Client 'kr...@fedoraproject.org' not found in Kerberos database while ge

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:22:44PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> repo data). The full list makes up most of the 40Mb downloaded. The >>> dnf developers seem to think that everyone h

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos >> authentication >> instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: >> >> kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedo

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos > authentication > instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: > > kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedoraaproject.org > > to get a valid kerberos TGT and be able to au

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 18:34 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Additionally, via GSSAPI many browsers allow you to seamlessly login  > to any of our ipsilon using applications simply by clicking on the > login  > button ( bodhi, fedorahosted trac, elections, fedocal, mailman3, etc) This is fantastic,

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Greetings. > > As previously announced, releng has made a number of changes as part of > it's 2016 "flag day". > > All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to > the > following package versions (some may be in testing

Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes

Greetings.  As previously announced, releng has made a number of changes as part of it's 2016 "flag day".  All package maintainers will want to make sure they have updated to the  following package versions (some may be in testing as of this email):  python-cccolutils-1.4-1  fedpkg-1.26-

Re: Are MP3 files now permitted in Fedora packages?

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 3:10 PM, wrote: > I would think that they are now allowed as they should work out of the box. > Maybe we need legal to clarify, then update the guidelines. I would think it would also depend that the actual content in the media is redistributable but then that's the case

Re: Are MP3 files now permitted in Fedora packages?

On 12/11/2016 07:33 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > I would expect if they are provided by upstream, they should be fine. > However, if they are generated during build from some other source, that > won't be acceptable, as MP3 encoding is still not allowed in Fedora. Note also that if you are generating

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:22:44PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> repo data). The full list makes up most of the 40Mb downloaded. The >> dnf developers seem to think that everyone has lots of data/bandwidth >> and don't see the problem with

Re: trying to install dictd-server and...

stevefoley12...@gmail.com wrote: > Well, I must say, Fedora is not making it easy! I've used Debian for a few > years and I really expect to install something and have it work. > > But...there are selinux issues, I guess. I really don't know about > selinux...now I'm learning a lot. There is a fol

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-12-09)

Chris Adams wrote: > I read email in mutt, a terminal-based mail client. I have it > configured so I can open up URLs in lynx easily. Recently though, I > can't open the agenda or logs from meetings in lynx. I don't know when > this happened (I don't try to pull them up all the time, just when I

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:22:44PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> repo data). The full list makes up most of the 40Mb downloaded. The >> dnf developers seem to think that everyone has lots of data/bandwidth >> and don't see the problem with

Re: HEADS UP: eigen-3.3.0 update

Sandro Mani wrote: > Actually, given the dependency on eigen headers in the public avogadro > headers, I suppose the only way forward is indeed to revive eigen2. Hmmm, what will that do to Kalzium, which currently uses both Avogadro and Eigen3? I think that will have to move back to Eigen2 as wel

Re: Koji update to Kerberos problem

> You have two accounts? Or you mean you tested with someone elses > account and got a Password prompt, but not your own? I have only one account. I used someone else's username to prove, I got right configuration. > In any case, you need to login to fas > ( https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accoun

Re: Koji update to Kerberos problem

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:13:17 +0100 Michal Schorm wrote: > Hi, i need to continue using Koji even tommorow. > I am using Kerberos already, so I just add Fedora config file. > > I believe, everything is set properly, because there exist more than > one login, that let me to the phase of writing do

Koji update to Kerberos problem

Hi, i need to continue using Koji even tommorow. I am using Kerberos already, so I just add Fedora config file. I believe, everything is set properly, because there exist more than one login, that let me to the phase of writing down the password. # kinit hho...@fedoraproject.org Password for hho.

Re: HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/11/2016 01:44 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > gpsbabel-0:1.5.3-4.fc24 >> >> + perl xmldoc/makedoc >> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rKbJFb: line 62: perl: command not found >> Can you file FTBFS bug? > > Why didn't you try a scratch-build in advanc

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Ms Sanchez wrote: > > > On 07/12/16 15:05, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 02:05:20PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > It's still a good test to do. For example, Server and netinst ISO > images are used a lot for VMs, but not for bare metal. > >

Re: HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

On 12/11/2016 01:44 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: gpsbabel-0:1.5.3-4.fc24 + perl xmldoc/makedoc /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rKbJFb: line 62: perl: command not found Can you file FTBFS bug? Why didn't you try a scratch-build in advance to a introducing broken builds into git? Anyway, I (gpsbabel maintainer)

Review Swap

Hi all, As Besser82 is still missing in action, could somebody with MPI experience finish this review: I will take another review in exchange. Thanks, Christoph -- Christoph Junghans Web: http://www.compphys.de

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-12-11)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Fedora Rawhide-20161211.n.0 compose check report

://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/51092#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload: Mount /run/media/test/Fedora-WS-Live-Rawhide-20161211- appeared since previous compose Mount /run/media/test/Fedora-WS-Live-Rawhide-20161210- disappeared since

Re: Are MP3 files now permitted in Fedora packages?

Once upon a time, Till Maas said: > Since Fedora now ships a MP3 decoder, does the Code vs Content section > in the Packaging Guidelines[0] now need a update to allow MP3 file or > are MP3 files still not permitted? I would expect if they are provided by upstream, they should be fine. However, if

Re: Are MP3 files now permitted in Fedora packages?

I would think that they are now allowed as they should work out of the box. Maybe we need legal to clarify, then update the guidelines. Dennis On 11 December 2016 11:26:38 am GMT+01:00, Till Maas wrote: >Hi, > >Since Fedora now ships a MP3 decoder, does the Code vs Content section >in the Pack

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161211.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161210.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161211.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 75 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 161.37 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Start packaging/maintaining in Fedora

On Dec 11, 2016 3:46 PM, "Ms Sanchez" wrote: Hello everyone! I want to start packaging and maintaining packages in Fedora, but I'm a bit lost. What should I do first? How can I start maintaining a package? Is there anyone who can guide me a bit, please? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

On 07/12/16 15:05, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 02:05:20PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: It's still a good test to do. For example, Server and netinst ISO images are used a lot for VMs, but not for bare metal. Well, your view - I have been using netinst-ISOs only, in recently

Start packaging/maintaining in Fedora

Hello everyone! I want to start packaging and maintaining packages in Fedora, but I'm a bit lost. What should I do first? How can I start maintaining a package? Is there anyone who can guide me a bit, please? I know Python and C languages. Thanks in advance! Sylvia __

Re: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

I've got a radiotray package which includes patches from a pending pull request to use gstreamer-1 instead of gstreamer: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/heikoada/xfce4-addons/package/radiotray/ Maybe someone wants to grab it and update radiotray to use gstreamer-1 Am 11.12.2016 um 14:43

Re: out of space on some builders

Il 11/12/2016 14:54, gil ha scritto: Il 11/12/2016 13:57, Igor Gnatenko ha scritto: Looks like there are problems on some builders: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 1; see build.log for more information And there is no build.log. Hi, the only error re

Re: out of space on some builders

On Dec 11, 2016 2:53 PM, "Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk" < puiterw...@redhat.com> wrote: > Looks like there are problems on some builders: Then reporting koji errors, it would be great if you could attach the task link so that we can check. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1683

Re: out of space on some builders

Il 11/12/2016 13:57, Igor Gnatenko ha scritto: Looks like there are problems on some builders: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 1; see build.log for more information And there is no build.log. Hi, the only error reported concerns libuser[1] " invalid ELF

Re: out of space on some builders

> Looks like there are problems on some builders: Then reporting koji errors, it would be great if you could attach the task link so that we can check. > > BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status > 1; see build.log for more information > > And there is no build.lo

Re: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

I have checked the git history of exile upstream and did not seem gstreamer1 related work :( El 7/12/2016 10:47 p. m., "Michael Cronenworth" escribió: On 12/07/2016 05:07 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > gstreamermm-1.4.3-1.fc25 looks like already use gstreamer1 > subtitleeditor-0.53.0-1.fc25 also

Re: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

On 10 Dec 2016 1:45 p.m., "Ralf Corsepius" wrote: On 12/10/2016 02:16 PM, Peter Oliver wrote: > On 9 Dec 2016 5:02 a.m., "Kevin Kofler" > wrote: > > Retiring such a library > is a very long process and not doable within a Fedora release. > > Is this true?

Orphaning uispec4j

Hi, upstream of uispec4j is dormant [1] since over a year, homepage is down [2]. I don't use this package and builds fail randomly on koschei [3]. R. [1] https://github.com/UISpec4J/UISpec4J/commits/master [2] https://github.com/UISpec4J/UISpec4J/issues/25 [3] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/kos

out of space on some builders

Looks like there are problems on some builders: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 1; see build.log for more information And there is no build.log. -- -Igor Gnatenko ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: [HEADS UP] gpgme-1.8.0 comes in Rawhide

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> There is also C++ bindings, but I didn't package it. Do you want me to do it? > > > If you could, I think it'd be appreciated if the C++ bindings were included. Done. New pacakges: * gpg

Re: HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > On 11.12.2016 12:54, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> >> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sandro Mani >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I'm preparing the shapelib-1.4.0 update, which bumped the soname. There >>> are >>> no API changes, it was just to s

Re: HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

On 11.12.2016 12:54, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm preparing the shapelib-1.4.0 update, which bumped the soname. There are no API changes, it was just to synchronize with the debian soname. Dependent packages are: gpsbabel-0:1.5.3-4.fc24 gr

Re: HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'm preparing the shapelib-1.4.0 update, which bumped the soname. There are > no API changes, it was just to synchronize with the debian soname. Dependent > packages are: > > gpsbabel-0:1.5.3-4.fc24 > grads-0:2.0.2-18.fc26 > librecad-0:

Re: HEADS UP: eigen-3.3.0 update

Actually, given the dependency on eigen headers in the public avogadro headers, I suppose the only way forward is indeed to revive eigen2. Anyone care to swap review with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403554? Thanks Sandro ___ devel mai

HEADS UP: shapelib soname bump

Hi I'm preparing the shapelib-1.4.0 update, which bumped the soname. There are no API changes, it was just to synchronize with the debian soname. Dependent packages are: gpsbabel-0:1.5.3-4.fc24 grads-0:2.0.2-18.fc26 librecad-0:2.1.0-1.fc25 marble-widget-qt5-1:16.08.3-1.fc26 plplot-libs-0:5.11

Re: Missing heads up for gmsh SONAME bump

On 11.12.2016 11:27, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Looks like there was no announcement nor rebuild of dependent packages. getdp has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: getdp-2.10.0-2.fc26.x86_64 requires libGmsh.so.2.14()(64bit) On armhfp: getdp-2.10.0-2.fc26.armv7hl

Missing heads up for gmsh SONAME bump

Looks like there was no announcement nor rebuild of dependent packages. getdp has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: getdp-2.10.0-2.fc26.x86_64 requires libGmsh.so.2.14()(64bit) On armhfp: getdp-2.10.0-2.fc26.armv7hl requires libGmsh.so.2.14 On ppc64le: get

Are MP3 files now permitted in Fedora packages?

Hi, Since Fedora now ships a MP3 decoder, does the Code vs Content section in the Packaging Guidelines[0] now need a update to allow MP3 file or are MP3 files still not permitted? Kind regards Till [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content __