Re: Nautilus usability

On 11/29/2016 09:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > About gnome bugzilla: > Once I had reported a bug in gnome-software, and it took almost a year for > someone to respond at all. Really? I fixed the bug 2 days after you had filed it, https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748582 -- Kalev

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:46:11 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > >> > There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus devs aren't happy >> > with >> > the feature set, or else I cannot explain why this progress window >> > feature has been cre

Re: Still use fedpkg to build docker images in OSBS?

On 11/29/2016 10:54 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:32:46PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: Hi, sorry for the confusion. I meant I'd like to know whether some packagers still use this command to build docker images in OSBS directly fedpkg container-build --build-with osbs

Re: [HELPWANTED] Building jquery for F24 branch

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:13 PM Tom Hughes wrote: > On 30/11/16 01:02, Christopher wrote: > > > Can anybody help me build js-jquery1 for F24? I keep getting some NodeJS > > and/or Grunt error with uglify, but only for the F24 branch. I want to > > update the package, and I can get all the other b

Re: [HELPWANTED] Building jquery for F24 branch

On 30/11/16 01:02, Christopher wrote: Can anybody help me build js-jquery1 for F24? I keep getting some NodeJS and/or Grunt error with uglify, but only for the F24 branch. I want to update the package, and I can get all the other branches to build just fine (including EPEL7, F25, and rawhide), b

[HELPWANTED] Building jquery for F24 branch

Can anybody help me build js-jquery1 for F24? I keep getting some NodeJS and/or Grunt error with uglify, but only for the F24 branch. I want to update the package, and I can get all the other branches to build just fine (including EPEL7, F25, and rawhide), but F24 is broken even before I apply any

Re: F25 GNOME Shell notification locked up hard for some time

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:01:16 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Here, it seems, any notification popup stalls the machine completely > > when clicking onto it. > > > > I'm going to reinstall F25, however, since I've come from a very late > > beta release. > > If you want to help with tracking down

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:32:01 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > I don't think this line of conversation is going to be particularly > productive. Not for Nautilus, that's true. There are competitive file managers, however. And simply filing an RFE isn't productive either, if there are no free develop

Re: installing RPMs on NFS filesystems

Without filesystem capabilities, many things will not work. Ping as a user for instance. Lots of setuid binaries switched to using filesystem capabilities rather than setuid and require it to work. RPM failing is the right thing to do. Dennis On 29 November 2016 8:04:07 am AEST, "J. Bruce Field

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 09:08:28PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus devs aren't happy > > > with the feature set, or else I cannot explain why this progress > > > window feature has been created exactly like this. > > You are just making assumptio

Re: state of advanced audio in Fedora

On 11/29/2016 12:58 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: I thought most of those music apps required jack to run--are you running jack or not? If you are, then it's probably just the usual jack/pulseaudio conflicts. Which Fedora seems set up to fix, but for seem reason the fix doesn't work; I filed a bug

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:51:14 -, carlos.sorian...@gmail.com wrote: > "There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus devs aren't happy with > the feature set" > We are never completely happy, after all we are quite demanding. > However there are few reasons why it's not excellent for your use

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:46:11 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus devs aren't happy > > with > > the feature set, or else I cannot explain why this progress window > > feature has been created exactly like this. > > You are just making assumptions ab

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On 29 November 2016 at 13:26, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 01:15 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> for gstreamer >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395128 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395768 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397064 >> >

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 01:15 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > for gstreamer  > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395128 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395768 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397064 > > for gstreamer1  > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On Ter, 2016-11-29 at 14:24 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:39:03AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > On 11/23/2016 02:15 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > On Ter, 2016-11-22 at 18:57 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Is anybo

Re: state of advanced audio in Fedora

Recently Ardour 4 has been added to Fedora repositories (without video support due legal problems). You may want to give a look to it https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ardour4/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To un

Re: state of advanced audio in Fedora

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:42:06PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > I was always impressed with the amount and quality of audio software in > Linux. When it all works, and is driven by someone who knows what they're > doing, it's essentially a high-end DAW production environment. If it all > worke

state of advanced audio in Fedora

I was always impressed with the amount and quality of audio software in Linux. When it all works, and is driven by someone who knows what they're doing, it's essentially a high-end DAW production environment. If it all worked smoothly, I am sure it could be one of Linux and Fedora showcases.

Re: upcoming build and release developer flag day December 12 2016

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:51:36 -0500 Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Alexander Bokovoy > wrote: > > On su, 27 marras 2016, Ken Dreyer wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Alexander Bokovoy > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Heimdal does not support MS-KKDCP spec

Re: State of LuaTeX in F25/rawhide

Avram Lubkin venit, vidit, dixit 28.11.2016 21:13: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Avram Lubkin > wrote: > > Forcing the pdftex driver gives an error about missing pdf primitives, > so this is most probably related to the removed pdf primitives in LuaTeX >

Re: Nautilus usability

Hi, Going to ask here to the whole thread. "Some cancelled tasks say Cancelled. Other cancelled tasks look like they're paused, with their most recent state during copy frozen in time, how many files copied," https://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus/commit/?id=d4a4f7915ccad4fbe9bb72 6dd9f876738c796

Re: Still use fedpkg to build docker images in OSBS?

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:32:46PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: > Hi, sorry for the confusion. I meant I'd like to know whether some > packagers still use this command to build docker images in OSBS > directly > > fedpkg container-build --build-with osbs > > A separate command could make rpkg m

Re: Trying not call elfutils functions in ABRT under root

On 29.11.2016 09:55, Adam Sulc wrote: > Thank you for fast reply. > > The problem is in > > int > dwfl_linux_proc_find_elf function: > https://github.com/xsulca00/elfutils-for-satyr/blob/satyr_dwfl_linux_proc_report/libdwfl/linux-proc-maps.c#L372 > > where : > https://github.com/xsulca00/elfuti

Re: F25 Server cloud image

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 03:21:01PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:12:53 + > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 02:49:23PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > I just wanted to download F25 Cloud image for OpenStack and was > > > surprised that there is n

Re: Still use fedpkg to build docker images in OSBS?

On 11/29/2016 09:24 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 01:50:29PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: What I know so far is that docker images are built in Koji by the container build plugin. I'd like to know if the osbs functionality in fedpkg is still useful for some of you. This could

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:39:03AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 11/23/2016 02:15 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >On Ter, 2016-11-22 at 18:57 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>Is anybody working on fixing [1]? > >> > >>The exploit is a little impractical in that it only works if you h

Re: F25 Server cloud image

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:12:53 + "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 02:49:23PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > I just wanted to download F25 Cloud image for OpenStack and was > > surprised that there is none. There is just Atomic image. But > > Atomic use rpm-ostree for inst

Re: F25 Server cloud image

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 02:49:23PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I just wanted to download F25 Cloud image for OpenStack and was surprised > that there is none. There is just Atomic image. > But Atomic use rpm-ostree for installing packages. There is no DNF. However I > cannot find any module fo

Re: F25 GNOME Shell notification locked up hard for some time

On 11/29/2016 02:52 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:39:30 +0100, Felipe Borges wrote: > >> sorry about that. >> >> Could you please report the bug at bugzilla.gnome.org/ > > Is it an upstream bug or downstream bug? > Does it work flawlessly for you? > > Here, it seems, any n

Re: F25 GNOME Shell notification locked up hard for some time

On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:39:30 +0100, Felipe Borges wrote: > sorry about that. > > Could you please report the bug at bugzilla.gnome.org/ Is it an upstream bug or downstream bug? Does it work flawlessly for you? Here, it seems, any notification popup stalls the machine completely when clicking on

Re: Nautilus usability

On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 14:40 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:26:50 +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > > I'm missing a link to a bug report here. > > Blame the bad experience I've made with tickets at > bugzilla.gnome.org. > > There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus d

Re: Nautilus usability

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:26:50 +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > I'm missing a link to a bug report here. Blame the bad experience I've made with tickets at bugzilla.gnome.org. There is no reason to believe that the Nautilus devs aren't happy with the feature set, or else I cannot explain why this pr

Re: Nautilus usability

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:20:18 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > And what does that have to do with the progress window issue? > > Sorry for taking the thread off-track. I had accidentally deleted the > original message and thought there was something about multiple copies > taking a long time as

Re: Still use fedpkg to build docker images in OSBS?

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 01:50:29PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: > What I know so far is that docker images are built in Koji by the > container build plugin. I'd like to know if the osbs functionality > in fedpkg is still useful for some of you. This could be helpful to > determine whether to remove

Re: OpenMPI binary only created on 64bit not on 32bit

> Am Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:02:01 -0700 > schrieb Orion Poplawski > Seems to be more comlicated,than just the build-error. > Nevertheless, "autoreconf ..." or "autoconf" does not work. > Just for the build-fix: > the newest upstream should have fixed the library-path problem, but the > configure-scr

Re: Trying not call elfutils functions in ABRT under root

Thank you for fast reply. The problem is in int dwfl_linux_proc_find_elf function: https://github.com/xsulca00/elfutils-for-satyr/blob/satyr_dwfl_linux_proc_report/libdwfl/linux-proc-maps.c#L372 where : https://github.com/xsulca00/elfutils-for-satyr/blob/satyr_dwfl_linux_proc_report/libdwfl/lin