request for new isomaster in EPEL

2016-11-26 Thread achim
Hello, the version listet here has a bug (limit on 4.2 GB) The actual version 1.3.13 has the correction. It would be nice to have it EPEL6 and EPEL7. Thanks and beste regards ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send a

request for new isomaster in EPEL

2016-11-26 Thread achim
Hello, the version listet here has a bug (limt on 4.2 GB) The actual version 1.3.13 has the correction. It would be nice to have it EPEL6 and EPEL7. Thanks and beste regards ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Nautilus usability

2016-11-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
This is about F25 and F24, but likely applies to older releases, too, since I haven't noticed any improvements about it. Have you ever made Nautilus copy/move a huge directory tree and then started a similar task for other directories while Nautilus was still working on the first task? What happe

Re: Self Introduction: Fabio Valentini (decathorpe)

2016-11-26 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hello Dominik, Thanks for the welcome, and for sponsoring me! On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 7:35 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > Hello, Fabio. > Welcome to Fedora community! > > On Thursday, 24 November 2016 at 22:34, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Here goes my introdu

Re: new gemspec behavior in rawhide

2016-11-26 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 11/26/2016 12:31 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Dusty Mabe wrote on 11/27/2016 01:35 AM: >> >> Hey all, >> >> In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get >> differing >> outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of `.freeze` added to my strings >> like: >> >> s.

Re: new gemspec behavior in rawhide

2016-11-26 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Dusty Mabe wrote on 11/27/2016 01:35 AM: Hey all, In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get differing outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of `.freeze` added to my strings like: s.authors = ["Dusty Mabe".freeze] See the full diff at [1]. This is caus

Re: Upgrade path violations in F25

2016-11-26 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sex, 2016-11-25 at 20:32 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2016-11-26 at 02:24 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > Every release we got always tones of updates in day 0, on upgrades > > and > > non-live versions everyone will update the computer , if we use > > netinstall iso already inclu

Re: new gemspec behavior in rawhide

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Hughes
On 26/11/16 16:35, Dusty Mabe wrote: In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get differing outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of `.freeze` added to my strings like: s.authors = ["Dusty Mabe".freeze] See the full diff at [1]. This is causing pain for m

new gemspec behavior in rawhide

2016-11-26 Thread Dusty Mabe
Hey all, In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get differing outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of `.freeze` added to my strings like: s.authors = ["Dusty Mabe".freeze] See the full diff at [1]. This is causing pain for me because I actually patch t

Fedora Rawhide-20161126.n.0 compose check report

2016-11-26 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 9/79 (x86_64), 4/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161125.n.0): ID: 49852 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161126.n.0 changes

2016-11-26 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161125.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161126.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 60 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B

Re: Upgrade path violations in F25

2016-11-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:47:01 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > It's worth remembering that upgrade path breakage really isn't that big > of a deal these days. dnf-system-upgrade has done a distro-sync (not > 'upgrade') for several releases now, and the instructions for upgrading > directly with dnf

Re: Upgrade path violations in F25

2016-11-26 Thread Peter Robinson
>>> On 11/25/2016 05:51 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> So we already do pretty much what you outline above. I started the first push to f25-updates on the Friday before the release. >>> >>> >>> I think, we are talking past each other. >>> >>> You seem to be referring to "the freeze" in ter

Re: Upgrade path violations in F25

2016-11-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > If we were going to do this, there would be no point having a freeze in > the first place. It'd be absurd to have a freeze, then cut release > images that ignored it. So abolish the freeze? The live respins that do not use any kind of freeze tend to just work, they're al

Re: upstream dev. asks suggestions about howto make packagers work easier (bundled libraries, etc.)

2016-11-26 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 21 November 2016 at 21:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: >> In Debian we have https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide >> I guess more official, cross-distro document that we all point upstream >> authors to would be a nice idea as well. > > It would