Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2016-10-11, Remi Collet wrote: > > > > It doesn't seem possible to use a compat library (else we will very > > probably going to encounter issues is both library versions are > > used in > > the same process, because of the numerous librar

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

On 11 October 2016 at 02:18, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Charalampos Stratakis wrote: >> tox is THE main reason for multiple interpreters in Fedora. >> >> So no the comments are not contradictory but it seems there is a lack of >> (technical) understanding of the actual situation here, but I may be wron

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > I knew that it was experimental when I first set it up years ago, but I > never imagined > it would still be experimental in 2016. I just got tired of waiting, and > the statement > that it would all most likely have to be rewritten was j

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Chris Murphy > wrote: >> >> > As far as BTRFS >> >> > is concerned however, I believe that ship has sailed. I used it for 4 >> > years, but after the recent news regarding RAID >> >> The only news about Btrf

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

Thomas Gilliard wrote: > This sounds like a use for https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/MultiWriter > let the people bring their own USB keys I already mentioned this sort of tool ("USB burning stations" – most of them were actually notebooks running software like this). It doesn't solve the problem tha

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

Chris Murphy wrote: > So if the context is 2Mbps or less, I'd think people would get > frustrated fairly quickly with the ~ 1GiB+ downloads Gnome Software > does in the background on first boot, with no UI for disabling it. That is just unacceptable behavior from GNOME Software and ought to be fi

[Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 25 Workstation Wayland Test Day: 2016-10-13!

On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 17:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Time to announce another Fedora 25 Test Day: [Wayland Test > Day][1]! >  [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2016-11-13_Wayland Damnit, that's obviously a typo. Correct link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:20

Re: Fedora 25-20161011.n.0 compose check report

On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 00:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Failed openQA tests: 7/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) > > New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161010.n.0): > > ID: 40461 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server > URL: https:/

Fedora 25-20161011.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161010.n.0): ID: 40461 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/40461 ID: 40483 Test: x86_64 universal su

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > As far as BTRFS > > is concerned however, I believe that ship has sailed. I used it for 4 > > years, but after the recent news regarding RAID > > The only news about Btrfs RAID I can think of that you're referring to > is the raid5 scrub b

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 16:29 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > We will work on porting the dependent packages to the new API. If by > some reasonable deadline there are still some packages that are not > dead by other reasons and we are unable to port them we can add -devel > to the compat package. Note

[Test-Announce] Fedora 25 Workstation Wayland Test Day: 2016-10-13!

Hi folks! Time to announce another Fedora 25 Test Day: [Wayland Test Day][1]! Note, the wiki page doesn't exist yet, as the wiki is having issues right now, but I wanted to make the announcement early enough to give people time to prepare. You may have read that we plan to make Fedora 25 Workstati

Re: More texlive woes in rawhide

Am 11.10.2016 um 19:49 schrieb gil: hi "Package resolution failed package texlive-latex-bin-bin-5:svn14050.0-8.20160520.fc26.1.noarch requires texlive-latex-bin, but none of the providers can be installed " from https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/metrics?collection=f26 any idea

Re: Please rebuild OpenEXR against GCC 6.2

Am 11.10.2016 um 04:03 schrieb Luya Tshimbalanga: After investigating the issues related to FTBS on Blender, it turned out the change from glibc cause OpenEXR to fail on Rawhide repository according to koschei report: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/blender I already filed the re

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko > wrote: >> >> You have still 4th option: >> - create from snapshots separated boot environment (BE) >> - do upgrade in BE >> - restart system from new BE >> >> To be honest only tis method s

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > You have still 4th option: > - create from snapshots separated boot environment (BE) > - do upgrade in BE > - restart system from new BE > > To be honest only tis method solves all hazards which are not listed in > your 3 points and additio

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On 10 October 2016 at 00:04, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > You have 3 options how to resolve it: > >1. You ignore it completely and you patiently wait until your system >crash. >2. Do Offline Updates >. >3. After restart y

Re: More texlive woes in rawhide

hi "Package resolution failed package texlive-latex-bin-bin-5:svn14050.0-8.20160520.fc26.1.noarch requires texlive-latex-bin, but none of the providers can be installed " from https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/metrics?collection=f26 any ideas? regards .g Il 11/10/2016 18:03,

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:41 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> U.S. rural areas? :-D > > I'm pretty rural, and even I have good internet. Maybe we need to > redefine "rural" to be independent of physicality :-) Yes it was sort of a ding on the state of affairs in the U.S. rather than rural areas. U.S.

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Richard Ryniker wrote: >>an optical specific Live Workstation spin > > Sounds like the proper category: will not block a regular Fedora release, > will not consume test resources for primary Fedora deliverables, and will > provide a focus for those with some stake

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

> U.S. rural areas? :-D I'm pretty rural, and even I have good internet. Maybe we need to redefine "rural" to be independent of physicality :-) > Based on feedback from Ambassadors, DVD images may still be useful > giveaways in regions with less access to bandwidth. I'm not sure what > to do ab

Re: Weak password madness is back again

On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:35:35 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:15:12AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > Yes. The hint that "this passphrase is weak" is very useful. But > > > enforcing any policy is just too inflexible

Re: iphone mount in nautilus on Fedora 24

Yeah surely there's a better way to handle this than physically connecting the device. Maybe OBEX and do it wirelessly with Bluetooth? Mounting the device seems fraught with problems, even MTP isn't well suited for this anymore. Chris Murphy ___ devel m

Re: iphone mount in nautilus on Fedora 24

On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 09:52 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > > Yup. The "normal" mount contains nothing that normal users > > > should access. > > > Accessing the photos will leave ghosts on the d

Copr && Rawhide -- no "rolling updates" workflow

FYI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381790 Seems like the `fedora-rawhide-x86_64` chroot is not going to exist from now, which is IMO unnecessary change ... but what could be other than those "obvious" consequences for both Copr repo maintainers and users? Does this sound like accept

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

On Út, 2016-10-11 at 16:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2016-10-11, Remi Collet wrote: > > > > It doesn't seem possible to use a compat library (else we will very > > probably going to encounter issues is both library versions are > > used in > > the same process, because of the numerous librari

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Út, 2016-10-11 at 15:27 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Vít Ondruch >> wrote: >> > >> > Just FTR, I opened Ruby upstream ticket asking about the OpenSSL >> > 1.1.0 >> > support: >> > >> > https://bugs.ruby-lan

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

On 2016-10-11, Remi Collet wrote: > It doesn't seem possible to use a compat library (else we will very > probably going to encounter issues is both library versions are used in > the same process, because of the numerous libraries linked to PHP or its > extensions) > That's true. I was just porti

Curios - Why python3 is not in critical path?

Hello! Looking at the pkgdb looks like python3 it is not included in the Fedora critical path: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python3/ https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python/ In the updates system also python3 is not part of the critical path update: https

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

On Út, 2016-10-11 at 15:27 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Vít Ondruch > wrote: > > > > Just FTR, I opened Ruby upstream ticket asking about the OpenSSL > > 1.1.0 > > support: > > > > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12830 > > > > Not sure if you'll have also som

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

On Út, 2016-10-11 at 09:25 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 10/07/2016 06:49 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > the openssl will be rebased in Rawhide to 1.1.0 on Monday. There > > will > > be also 1.0.2 compat package (compat-openssl10) so the dependencies > > are > > not broken and

Re: More texlive woes in rawhide

It would be really stop this texlive madness. Spec file with attached more than 100 source archives, with separated each bit in and -bin (???) Why the not build base package with kind of platform which will allow build each tex package separately? With current approach every single change i texli

Re: grub, grubby, btrfs, was: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE ...

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> 4. An issue with using syslinux's format, as well as the original >> bootloader spec format, and a major source of disagreement, is the >> assumption that the kernel and initrd are on the same file system as >> the bootloader and its config

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

On 10/07/2016 06:49 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > Hi all, > > the openssl will be rebased in Rawhide to 1.1.0 on Monday. There will > be also 1.0.2 compat package (compat-openssl10) so the dependencies are > not broken and Rawhide should be installable. Also things that do not > depend on openssl should

Fedora Rawhide-20161011.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 3/91 (x86_64), 2/16 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161010.n.0): ID: 40308 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/40308 ID: 4

Re: More texlive woes in rawhide

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Richard Fearn wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382447 > > spot said the problem should be fixed in the -8 build > (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=808434), which > has completed. I see your failed build used the -7 packag

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: IBus Emoji Typing

- Original Message - > On 07/11/16 20:25, Bastien Nocera-san wrote: > > > > > > - Original Message - > >> On 07/08/16 20:41, Bastien Nocera-san wrote: > >>> I think that the emoji input method should be a separate input method, so > >>> that most users would have the choice betwee

Announcing the release of Fedora 25 Beta

The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of Fedora 25 Beta, the next big step on our journey to the exciting Fedora 25 release in November. Fedora's journey is not simply about updating one operating system with the latest and greatest packages. It's also about innovati

Re: iphone mount in nautilus on Fedora 24

- Original Message - > > - Original Message - > > > > Yup. The "normal" mount contains nothing that normal users should access. > > Accessing the photos will leave ghosts on the device, and there have been > > no > > ways to update the music database in Linux for a few iOS releas

Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 03:29:37PM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > very low. Just for an information: on Fedora we have every week > created approx. 400 - 500 new bugs. I can not imagine doing review of > such an amount of bugs on (bi-)weekly basic. Blocker bug meeting Oh my no. We wouldn't review all b

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

mongo-c-driver 1.3.5 (current version in rawhide) is not compatible. mongo-c-driver 1.4+ is But pecl/mongodb 1.2.0 is not yet released (alpha3) and will require both libbson 1.5.0 and mongo-c-driver 1.5.0 (only RC for now) So, stalled for now. Remi. P.S.1: v1.4 drop a private lib, only used

[HEADS UP] openbabel-2.4 update (ABI bump)

Hello, I've just pushed (not built yet) openbabel-2.4.1 in rawhide. I rebuilt all the affected packages locally to ensure there are no issues. The only thing failing is xdrawchem, which I maintain and that's not due to openbabel update anyway. Affected packages which I'll be rebuilding later today

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

Dne 11.10.2016 v 12:57 Petr Viktorin napsal(a): > > The alternative to packaging those Pythons in Fedora is putting them > in some COPR. I believe this would send a bad message. If we want to > make Fedora friendly for Python developers, we should make > cross-version testing officially supported

Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 02:33:37PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> We used to have exactly this, up until Fedora 14. We had 'Target' > [much snip] >> lighter process than the blocker review process, though I don't have a >> specific propos

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Just FTR, I opened Ruby upstream ticket asking about the OpenSSL 1.1.0 > support: > > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12830 > > Not sure if you'll have also some Fedora specific tracker Would be nice to get tracking bug created on RHBZ,

Re: "Could not retire package"

- Original Message - > On Thursday, September 15, 2016 12:20:57 PM CDT Bastien Nocera wrote: > > - Original Message - > > > > > On Thursday, September 15, 2016 11:51:47 AM CDT Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > Could not retire package: You are not allowed to retire the package: > > >

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

Just FTR, I opened Ruby upstream ticket asking about the OpenSSL 1.1.0 support: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12830 Not sure if you'll have also some Fedora specific tracker Vít Dne 10.10.2016 v 16:29 Tomas Mraz napsal(a): > On So, 2016-10-08 at 13:37 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>

F26 Self Contained Change: PHP 7.1

= Proposed Self Contained Change: PHP 7.1 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php71 Change owner(s): * Remi Collet Update the PHP stack in Fedora to latest version 7.1.x == Detailed Description == Update the PHP stack in Fedora to latest version 7.1.x. * PHP 7.1.0RC3 was released Sep 29t

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: BIND version 9.11

On 10/09/2016 09:58 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: BIND version 9.11 = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIND_9.11 > > > > Change owner(s): > > * Tomas Hozza > > * Michal Ruprich > > > > BIND (Berkeley

Re: More texlive woes in rawhide

Hi, > it seems right now I can't rebuild the rdkit package [1] due to this: > > pdflatex 'RDKit.tex' > This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.17 (TeX Live 2016) > (preloaded format=pdflatex) > restricted \write18 enabled. > kpathsea: Running mktexfmt pdflatex.fmt > mktexfmt: mktexfmt is usi

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

Le 11/10/2016 à 13:09, Remi Collet a écrit : > PHP version 7.0.x is not compatible with OpenSSL 1.1 But PHP 7.1 is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16046780 So: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php71 Remi. ___ devel mailing lis

Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:00:05PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Based on feedback from Ambassadors, DVD images may still be useful > > giveaways in regions with less access to bandwidth. I'm not sure what > > to do about that. > U.S. rural areas? :-D Possibly, although I think most people would

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:50:13AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 11.10.2016 v 01:59 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:29:16AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> Dne 9.10.2016 v 05:42 Nick Coghlan napsal(a): > >>> On 8 October 2016 at 23:13, Kevin Kofler

Re: Missing qemu deps on ppc64le

>>> DEBUG util.py:421: Error: Package: >>> 2:qemu-system-aarch64-2.6.1-1.fc24.ppc64le (updates) >>> DEBUG util.py:421: Requires: edk2-aarch64 >>> DEBUG util.py:421: Error: Package: >>> 2:qemu-system-x86-2.6.1-1.fc24.ppc64le (updates) >>> DEBUG util.py:421: Requires: edk2-o

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

Le 10/10/2016 à 16:29, Tomas Mraz a écrit : > On So, 2016-10-08 at 13:37 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Tomas Mraz wrote: >>> >>> At worst if the patching of a package is highly non-trivial and the >>> upstream is not responsive we might have to drop the package from >>> Fedora. >>> >>> We do not wa

Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

On 10/06/2016 03:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 10:39 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: So I like the idea, I do propose to simply re-use most of the blocker bug process for this, rather then inventing yet another process. I guess this could even be integrated and the way to get

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

On 10/10/2016 06:18 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Charalampos Stratakis wrote: tox is THE main reason for multiple interpreters in Fedora. So no the comments are not contradictory but it seems there is a lack of (technical) understanding of the actual situation here, but I may be wrong here, so pleas

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

I'd like to apologize for the wording "No security fixes will be applied". It was meant as a warning to users who might install the package without knowing what it is for, not as a declaration that we won't maintain the package properly. The "python26" package is meant to provide just that --

Re: Fedora 25 compose report: 20161010.n.0 changes

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Fedora Branched Report < rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > [Agda] > [darcs] > [ghc-boxes] > [ghc-hakyll] > [ghc-happstack-server] > [ghc-hledger-lib] > [ghc-scotty] > [ghc-shelly] > [ghc-snap-core] > [ghc-snap-server] > [ghc-warp] > [haskell-platform] > [hledger

Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

> Speaking for myself only here, my experience in the gfx team > is that there are so many bugs that I cannot see the forest > through the trees. > > A list with issues which are not blockers, but only barely so > and it would be really really good to have them fixed, > would certainly be a list I

Re: Missing qemu deps on ppc64le

On 10/10/2016 16:53, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 10.10.2016 o 16:34, Paolo Bonzini pisze: >> On 10/10/2016 13:30, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > >>> just seen: >>> DEBUG util.py:421: Error: Package: >>> 2:qemu-system-aarch64-2.6.1-1.fc24.ppc64le (updates) >>> DEBUG util.py:421: Re

Re: Weak password madness is back again

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:15:12AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Yes. The hint that "this passphrase is weak" is very useful. But > > enforcing any policy is just too inflexible. I just tried to explain > > (unsuccessfully) to a kid (2nd grade, so any "strong

Re: Weak password madness is back again

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:56:38AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 16:17 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > (In addition, typing "password" in the gnome search box does *not* > > lead to something that allows you to change your password, one needs > > to search fo

Re: grub, grubby, btrfs, was: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE ...

Hi, > > ... and have a fixed grub2.cfg which basically has the command to parse > > the syslinux config file? > > > > OK so there are a few things: > > 1. The information needed to present boot options, the "menu entries", > are a separate thing from the bootloader specific configuration file

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

Dne 11.10.2016 v 01:59 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:29:16AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Dne 9.10.2016 v 05:42 Nick Coghlan napsal(a): >>> On 8 October 2016 at 23:13, Kevin Kofler wrote: These python[23][1-9] packages are entirely unnecessary and sh

Re: RISC-V struggle (for GMP porting)

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 01:47:46AM +0200, Torbjörn Granlund wrote: > The last few days, I have made a confused wandering around many current > and obsolete(?) fedora web pages wrt RISC-V. All the pages under https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RISC-V should be up to date (except for the

Re: Weak password madness is back again

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Yes. The hint that "this passphrase is weak" is very useful. But > enforcing any policy is just too inflexible. I just tried to explain > (unsuccessfully) to a kid (2nd grade, so any "strong" password would > simply be immediately forgotten) why she cannot chan

Re: koschei failed dep resolution

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 21:34:03 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > For a number of packages, koschei is now showing: > > Package resolution failed package > texlive-collection-basic-5:svn41149-8.20160520.fc26.1.noarch requires > xdvik, but none of the providers can be installed > > I'm not sure