On 10/01/2016 08:37 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
While building one of my packages I got this error:
DEBUG util.py:421: Error: nothing provides tex-texlve-common needed
by texlive-collection-basic-5:svn41149-3.20160520.fc26.1.noarch.
DEBUG util.py:421: nothing provides tex-texlve-common needed b
On 09/30/2016 11:21 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Removing these lines from the spec file below
# -DBoost_INCLUDE_DIR=%{_includedir} \
# -DLUXRAYS_DISABLE_OPENCL:BOOL=OFF \
# -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -DLUXRAYS_DISABLE_OPENCL=0" \
# -DCMAKE_CXX_
On 10/01/2016 09:30 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Now hitting an issue related to the %build part, this time failing on
make section.
The scratch build is available for viewing to see where might be the
problem:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ta
On 10/01/2016 02:00 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Hi,
I'm just looking at the rpmlint errors for the xpra package, and one I
am stuck on is this:
xpra.x86_64: E: dir-or-file-in-var-run /var/run/xpra
The package drops a file in /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d which causes the
creation of /var/run/xpra when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Now hitting an issue related to the %build part, this time failing on
make section.
The scratch build is available for viewing to see where might be the
problem:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15902022
I cleaned the spec file due
# F25 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2016-10-03
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We currently have 2 proposed Beta blockers and 3 proposed
Final blockers to review. There are also 3 accepted Beta blockers to
check in on.
If you have time this week
Hi,
I have orphaned the emacs-common-ebib package on all branches. The
package builds fine, but is very outdated cf upstream. Updating to the
latest upstream version would require packaging a number of
dependencies which I don't have the time to do currently.
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 1 October 2016 at 21:32, Jonathan Underwood
wrote:
> On 20 July 2016 at 15:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Upstream is dead (website is gone), it hasn't seen a release in over three
>> years
>> and nothing in Fedora relies on it anymore.
>
> Actually, the package js-web-socket-js depended on
On 20 July 2016 at 15:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Upstream is dead (website is gone), it hasn't seen a release in over three
> years
> and nothing in Fedora relies on it anymore.
Actually, the package js-web-socket-js depended on this during build.
Yeah, I only just noticed - just a heads up
Hi,
I'm just looking at the rpmlint errors for the xpra package, and one I
am stuck on is this:
xpra.x86_64: E: dir-or-file-in-var-run /var/run/xpra
The package drops a file in /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d which causes the
creation of /var/run/xpra when needed.
The package has this in %{files}:
%ghost
On Sáb, 2016-10-01 at 09:25 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 11:09:44AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones > com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is
> > > missing.
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 4/102 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160930.n.0):
ID: 37794 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 49/80 (x86_64), 13/15 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160930.n.2):
ID: 37727 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_enc
While building one of my packages I got this error:
DEBUG util.py:421: Error: nothing provides tex-texlve-common needed
by texlive-collection-basic-5:svn41149-3.20160520.fc26.1.noarch.
DEBUG util.py:421: nothing provides tex-texlve-common needed by
texlive-collection-basic-5:svn41149-3.20160520.
Hello,
As I am getting more involved in Fedora, I decided to go for a FAS name
change to better represent my presence on mailing lists and IRC.
My old FAS name was ribeiro
The new one is athoscr
nb helped me with the migration, approving me from all the other FAS
groups. I also informed my packa
On Saturday, October 1, 2016 11:09:44 AM CDT Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> > In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is
> > missing. However they don't have 'BuildRequires: perl'.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 09:42:07AM -0700, stan wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to have a way for package maintainers to
decide if a bug was local or upstream, and a button they could push to
automatically send it upstream?
I really like Stan's idea. The root of this problem lies in the
histo
Pull Request sent: https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/51
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> File
> "/usr/lib64/python3.5/site-packages/pyanaconda/packaging/dnfpayload.py",
> line 537, in _select_group
> self._base.group_install(grp.id, types, exclude=exclude)
File "/usr/lib64/python3.5/site-packages/pyanaconda/packaging/dnfpayload.py",
line 537, in _select_group
self._base.group_install(grp.id, types, exclude=exclude)
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 1359, in
group_install
return self._add_comps_trans(trans)
File
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 49/80 (x86_64), 14/15 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160929.n.1):
ID: 37588 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_d
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 11:09:44AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is
> > missing. However they don't have 'BuildRequires: perl'.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes
I remember that perl-generators were removed from deps of rpm-build.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is
> missing. However they don't have 'BuildRequires: perl'.
>
> One example is 'telnet':
>
> https://fedo
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is
> missing. However they don't have 'BuildRequires: perl'.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Build_Root_Without_Perl
> If so I will add a BR: perl to the packages wh
Never mind, I found the right page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Build_Root_Without_Perl
So I'll go ahead and add 'BuildRequires: perl-generators' where that is
necessary.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and v
In the RISC-V mass rebuild, some packages fail because Perl is
missing. However they don't have 'BuildRequires: perl'.
One example is 'telnet':
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/risc-v/logs/telnet/0.17-65.fc24/build.log
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ksu80z: line 36: perl: command not found
error: Bad exit
25 matches
Mail list logo
