Re: [HEADS UP] Gnome 3.22 update for Fedora 25 is broken!

2016-09-25 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, 2016-09-25 at 23:31 +0200, Heiko Adams wrote: > Downgrading to 2.13.92 fixes this issue for the moment. So no I can't > reproduce this with 2.13.92. OK that's ideal, it means there's only one or two commits that might have broken it. The problem is that so far you're the only person hit,

Re: duplicate package on fresh install

2016-09-25 Thread Samuel Rakitničan
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos > > Could be lots of reasons. An x86_64 and i686 library installed > simultaneously can appear confusingly as duplicate libraries if you > don't ask rpm to report architecture. A system interruption during the > update can block rpm from

come stai?

2016-09-25 Thread GILBERTO CTTNEO
Saluti, Ho letto un articolo recente e mi ha ricordato te, ti prego di leggere qui e dirmi i tuoi pensieri Cari saluti, GILBERTO CTTNEO ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: [HEADS UP] Gnome 3.22 update for Fedora 25 is broken!

2016-09-25 Thread Heiko Adams
Am Sonntag, den 25.09.2016, 19:21 +0200 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: > Also, could you reproduce the issue with 2.13.92? >  Downgrading to 2.13.92 fixes this issue for the moment. So no I can't reproduce this with 2.13.92. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sig

ANNOUNCE: Fedora/RISC-V disk images and RPMs available

2016-09-25 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I'm really pleased to announce that we are making Fedora RISC-V images available. These are clean, RPM-built, bootable disk images: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/risc-v/disk-images/ The "full fat" version also contains all of the extra packages at the time of building, so you can install the

Re: A tale of systemd and MaxProcs

2016-09-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:54:45 - "Timothy Ward" wrote: > Although I agree with the above then may be a builder should have a > rawhide VM running with these updated critical packages if only for > testing purposes to expose this type of failure. Sure, as I noted perhaps we should move some of

Re: [HEADS UP] Gnome 3.22 update for Fedora 25 is broken!

2016-09-25 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 21:57 +0200, Heiko Adams wrote: > Hi, > after updating to Gnome 3.22 it seems that at least evolution[1] and  > epiphany[2] are broken but I'm affraid the problem affects any app > which  > deals with html conten. Can anyone else reproduce this issue? We are thinking this mig

Re: A tale of systemd and MaxProcs

2016-09-25 Thread Timothy Ward
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > That's a reflection on the nature of the change itself though. People > don't run large, stable workloads that would hit the TasksMax limit on > rawhide. They run them on stable releases. It's a chicken-egg > situation from a t

Re: A tale of systemd and MaxProcs

2016-09-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:18:47 -0700 Laura Abbott wrote: > The particular issue came here with an upgrade to F24. Where does > rawhide fit into this? It seems like this should have been found > with rawhide or at least someone noticed an issue. Well, I guess no one is running services that hit the

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring builds for EL7 instead of Rawhide

2016-09-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:51:31 +0200 Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I definitely fixed this issue: > https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/commit/2eed58c4ea09729f17e8c672196318d7028b0dba Excllent! Thank you. Looks like it's been merged and we just need to cut a new release and deploy it. Will

Fedora 25-20160925.n.0 compose check report

2016-09-25 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in 25-20160924.n.0): ID: 36143 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.

Re: A tale of systemd and MaxProcs

2016-09-25 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Nevertheless, for our defense, let me point out that the problems with > this change are obvious only in hindsight: after all new systemd versions > are only introduced in rawhide / pre-beta, and this was added in 228, > while F

Re: iphone mount in nautilus on Fedora 24

2016-09-25 Thread Timothy Ward
> - Original Message - > > Yup. The "normal" mount contains nothing that normal users should access. > Accessing the photos will leave ghosts on the device, and there have been no > ways to update the music database in Linux for a few iOS releases. I very much doubt that anyone would rele