Hi
Il 25/09/2016 00:00, Mukundan Ragavan ha scritto:
5/ python-flit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
Take also this one
Regards
.g
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@
Hi
Il 25/09/2016 00:00, Mukundan Ragavan ha scritto:
4/ python-pickleshare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379093
Take also this one
but most of your imported package are without license file
Please, ask to upstreams to add license and copyright notice.
https://fedoraproject.org/wi
On 09/24/2016 06:30 PM, gil wrote:
> hi
>
> Il 25/09/2016 00:00, Mukundan Ragavan ha scritto:
>> 1/ python-qtconsole
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379090
> take!
> have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366845 ?
> thanks in advance
> regards
> .g
thanks!
hi
Il 25/09/2016 00:00, Mukundan Ragavan ha scritto:
1/ python-qtconsole
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379090
take!
have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366845 ?
thanks in advance
regards
.g
___
devel mailing
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 21:47 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
Sorry again for the dupes, folks. My anti-dupe code had some issues. I
think I fixed 'em.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . n
Hi folks,
Spyder 3 was released recently and several runtime dependencies are not
present in Fedora repositories (as far as I can tell).
I have review requests that will address these runtime dependencies
(below). Please take up the packages for review. I am, of course,
willing to swap reviews.
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 4/102 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20160923.n.0):
ID: 35882 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/3
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 21:13 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
>
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
>
> Failed openQA tests: 4/102 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
>
> Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20160923.n.0):
Since I didn't expl
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 16:28 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
>
> Xfce raw-xz armhfp
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
>
> Failed openQA tests: 6/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160923.n.0)
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160923.n.0):
ID: 36079 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedorapr
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 4/102 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20160923.n.0):
ID: 35882 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/3
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> IMHO best practice is to *always* pass all the --enable-XXX feature flags
> to 'configure' that you expect the package to be building with, and not
> rely on auto-detection.
But some build setups will still happily ignore the dependency if it is
unavailable, even if yo
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:18:53PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:32:40PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * IMHO the initial upstream default didn't make sense for Fedora
>
> On this specific change, I'm not sure the *updated* default makes sense
> either. It still is quit
That will be great !
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 6/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160923.n.0):
ID: 36012 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fe
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 6/102 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160923.n.0):
ID: 35877 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedora
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 6/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160923.n.0):
ID: 36012 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fe
Oh, I see, thanks. I remember a couple of years ago that Fedora
installed 32-bits stuff by itself and I ended with a messed system, but
I guess that was a bug.
Thank you!
Sylvia
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 14:46 +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Sylvia wrote:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 25 Branched 20160924.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Sylvia wrote:
> This is maybe a silly question but... if you're architecture is, let's say
> x86_64, why would anything install an i686 version of the same package?
If you install a 32-bit program, it may pull in other i686
dependencies. See what happens if you t
Hello,
This is maybe a silly question but... if you're architecture is, let's
say x86_64, why would anything install an i686 version of the same
package?
Cheers,
Sylvia
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 06:15 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> Could be lots of reasons. An x86_64 and i686 library inst
I can take this package.
ср, 21 сент. 2016 г., 12:57 jack smith :
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to Yaakov Selkowitz, we finally found why Gsmartcontrol doesn't
> start. It miss a dependency (usermode-gtk) but maintainer Eric Smith don't
> answer for a month now.
> I don't know if he still really maintain G
On 09/23/2016 09:57 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Hi,
> after updating to Gnome 3.22 it seems that at least evolution[1] and
> epiphany[2] are broken but I'm affraid the problem affects any app which
> deals with html conten.
>
> So please unpush that update and fix the problem ASAP.
>
> [1] https://b
Hi,
it seems the latest webkitgtk4 update breaks Evolution and epiphany.
As a workaround downgrading webkitgtk4 packages fixes the problem.
Am Freitag, den 23.09.2016, 21:57 +0200 schrieb Heiko Adams:
> Hi,
> after updating to Gnome 3.22 it seems that at least evolution[1] and
> epiphany[2] are b
24 matches
Mail list logo
