On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 21:47 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just want to let you know I am planning to document it on the WebKit
> wiki and also downstream somewhere (seems like a README might be
> better
> than a wiki page?).
>
> Michael
An update on this. We have frozen the DOM bindi
Hello,
This is regard to bz1372136... as the bz says
From Koji logs :
- x86_64 and armv7hl have an issue in configure : checking for res_querydomain
in -lresolv... no
- i686 works : checking for res_querydomain in -lresolv... yes
This is strange, since the symbol in present in /lib/libresolv-
On 09/01/2016 09:59 PM, Raphael Groner wrote:
> HI,
>
> I'll orphan some of my packages due to lack of available time to properly
> maintain them:
> - rpms/bats -- Bash Automated Testing System ( master f25 f24 f23 epel7 el6 )
I'll take bats
piotr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
HI,
I'll orphan some of my packages due to lack of available time to properly
maintain them:
- rpms/bats -- Bash Automated Testing System ( master f25 f24 f23 epel7 el6 )
- rpms/docsis-config-encoder -- Encode a DOCSIS binary configuration file (
master f25 f24 f23 )
- rpms/i7z -- CLI curses bas
I've filed an issue to track this problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372461
Thanks again!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 20:45 +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> The F24 copr seems to be broken. I've enabled it, updated all
> packages
> and running 'bodhi', it seems to be broken:
>
> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'bodhi==2.1.8' distribution
> was
> not found and is required by t
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:34:00PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> I forgot to mention, I'm also maintaining a Copr for Bodhi 2 for Fedora
> 23 and 24:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bowlofeggs/bodhi/
>
> Copr doesn't seem to have Fedora 25 buildroots yet, but I'll try to
> remember to
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 09:38:08 -0400
jason taylor wrote:
> Working on getting a bro build for epel7 and I am running into what
> appears to be a provides bug with cmake3.
That's correct analysis yes, cmake3 provides cmake which it shouldn't
really do.
--
Tuomo Soini
Foobar Linux services
+358
I forgot to mention, I'm also maintaining a Copr for Bodhi 2 for Fedora
23 and 24:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bowlofeggs/bodhi/
Copr doesn't seem to have Fedora 25 buildroots yet, but I'll try to
remember to add Fedora 25 as well once it does.
signature.asc
Description: This is a di
Hello again Fedora friends!
I just built bodhi-2.1.8-1.fc26 for Rawhide, and wanted to give you a
heads up as it is a backwards incompatible change. Rawhide previously
had bodhi-0.9.12.2-5.fc25.noarch so this is a pretty major update.
The bodhi client is probably what most of you are used to inte
On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 15:57 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
> Failed openQA tests: 15/89 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> ID: 31621 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
> URL: https://
> "NK" == Nico Kadel-Garcia writes:
NK> To me, it looks like systemd is activating a universal policy which
NK> you, and others, need more thoughtful and tunable handling for.
NK> Attempting to tune it by outsmarting systemd's default behavior
NK> looks expensive and unstable.
Well, please k
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 15/89 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 31621 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31621
ID: 31622 Test: x86_64 Workstation-liv
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 04:13:13AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Agreed. The acceptance of the feature without any logging, whatsoever,
> of what processes it killed and when shocked me. It's the sort of
But note that we _didn't accept the feature without any logging. And
see https://bugzilla.
On 09/01/2016 01:31 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Hello my fellow Fedora friends!
>
> It's 01:00 in my local time and perhaps I should be resting instead of
> trying to figure out chicken-and-egg problems at such a time, but my
> tired mind is on the fence about the solution to one of my tickets and
>
Hello,
-> https://github.com/skontar/cvss
-> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-cvss/
-> https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.0
Recently I packaged the cvss Python modules for computing
Common Vulnerability Scoring System(CVSS) rating for security issues.
It contai
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> After reading (some of) the "discussion" about systemd-logind's
> KillUserProcesses setting, I decided that I'd like to try enabling it
> and see how it works and how I can make it useful in my environment.
> Sorry, it's long, but I t
Hi,
My first time packaging: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
The review request has been created for about 1 week, but no reviews done yet.
Could someone help to review it? Or maybe do a review swap?
Thanks,
Yunying
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
20 matches
Mail list logo
