Fedora 25 Alpha 1.1 compose check report

2016-08-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 8/88 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 29648 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29648 ID: 29649 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_def

Re: Broken: Firefox 48 + Private Tab + Kerberos SSO

2016-08-23 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Aug 23, 2016 16:46, "Dusty Mabe" wrote: I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a non-private window. Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone

Re: Broken: Firefox 48 + Private Tab + Kerberos SSO

2016-08-23 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dusty Mabe wrote: I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a non-private window. Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this? We fixed an information leak that was

[Test-Announce] Fedora 25 Candidate Alpha-1.1 Available Now!

2016-08-23 Thread rawhide
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate Alpha-1.1 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the c

Re: Broken: Firefox 48 + Private Tab + Kerberos SSO

2016-08-23 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Aug 23, 2016 16:46, "Dusty Mabe" wrote: > > > I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos > single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a > non-private window. > > Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this? > I would guess it is

Re: Kernel 4.7 rebase plans

2016-08-23 Thread Laura Abbott
On 08/15/2016 08:31 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: Hi, I just submitted the 4.6.6 kernel update to stable for F23/F24. Both 4.7.1 and 4.6.7 are expected to be released upstream on Tuesday. 4.6.7 will be the last 4.6.y based kernel for F23/F24. 4.7.1 or 4.7.2 will be available for testing sometime early

Re: Broken: Firefox 48 + Private Tab + Kerberos SSO

2016-08-23 Thread Robert Marcano
On 08/23/2016 04:44 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a non-private window. Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this? I just noticed it after reading y

Broken: Firefox 48 + Private Tab + Kerberos SSO

2016-08-23 Thread Dusty Mabe
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a non-private window. Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this? Dusty -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedor

Fedora Rawhide-20160823.n.0 compose check report

2016-08-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 58/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 29511 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29511 ID: 29512 Test: x86_64 Ever

Fedora 25-20160822.n.1 compose check report

2016-08-23 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 11/89 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 29413 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29413 ID: 29414 Test: x86_64 Wor

Re: review swaps

2016-08-23 Thread Björn Esser
Thanks you very much for the reviews! ^^ We need a compat-pkg for rubygem-listen, I'm afraid… :( Am 23.08.2016 um 19:45 schrieb gil: hi damm i dont know what happen! $ fedora-review -b 1368851 --plugins Ruby -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -L /home/gil/deps INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1368851

Re: review swaps

2016-08-23 Thread gil
hi damm i dont know what happen! $ fedora-review -b 1368851 --plugins Ruby -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -L /home/gil/deps INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1368851 INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 1368851 INFO: --> SRPM url: https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/jekyll/rubygem-jekyll-3.2

Naming a sphinx-doc theme: python-sphinx_py3doc_enhanced_theme or python-sphinx-theme-py3doc-enhanced

2016-08-23 Thread Julien Enselme
Hi, Recently I opened a review [1] for a new sphinx theme: py3doc_enhanced_theme [2] The upstream name is sphinx_py3doc_enhanced_theme, so in my opinion, the the package should be named python-sphinx_py3doc_enhanced_theme. Furthermore, there's another sphinx theme with underscores in its name: py

Re: review swaps

2016-08-23 Thread Björn Esser
A'ighty! Took them… =) Am 23.08.2016 um 16:37 schrieb gil: Il 23/08/2016 16:14, Björn Esser ha scritto: Hello folks, I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed change in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with. Cheers Björn (besser82) hi tak

Re: review swaps

2016-08-23 Thread gil
Il 23/08/2016 16:14, Björn Esser ha scritto: Hello folks, I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed change in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with. Cheers Björn (besser82) hi take: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368844 https://b

review swaps

2016-08-23 Thread Björn Esser
Hello folks, I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed change in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with. Cheers Björn (besser82) [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1368851&hide_resolved=1 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wi

Re: jni problem on ARM builder

2016-08-23 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 13:26, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:17:54 +0200 > gil wrote: > > > hi > > > > tried to build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839 > > > > on arm builder > > but there is this problem > > > > net_openhft_ticker_impl_JNIClock.cpp:59:25: e

Re: koji failure

2016-08-23 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:59:21 AM CDT gil wrote: > Il 23/08/2016 00:53, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto: > > On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:43:28 AM CDT gil wrote: > >> hi any idea? > > > > Looks like it was a bad timing issue and you should be able to submit the > > build for an update. if that d

Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

2016-08-23 Thread Andrea Musuruane
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. > > - > > The Filesystem Layout section of the guidelines was simplified and > outdated information was removed. > > * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines >

Re: jni problem on ARM builder

2016-08-23 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:17:54 +0200 gil wrote: > hi > > tried to build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839 > > on arm builder > but there is this problem > > net_openhft_ticker_impl_JNIClock.cpp:59:25: error: 'rdtsc' was not > declared in this scope rdtsc is x86 specific instr

Re: jni problem on ARM builder

2016-08-23 Thread Tom Hughes
On 23/08/16 12:17, gil wrote: tried to build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839 on arm builder but there is this problem net_openhft_ticker_impl_JNIClock.cpp:59:25: error: 'rdtsc' was not declared in this scope any ideas? Well rdtsc is an x86 assembly instruction to read th

Re: bash style guide on Fedora?

2016-08-23 Thread Jun Aruga
Hi, Okay, I could install the shellcheck with the Fedora package. And it works, and it looks nice. I am going to use those 2 checkers for a while. Thanks. Jun Aruga - Original Message - > From: "Christopher" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, August 2

jni problem on ARM builder

2016-08-23 Thread gil
hi tried to build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839 on arm builder but there is this problem net_openhft_ticker_impl_JNIClock.cpp:59:25: error: 'rdtsc' was not declared in this scope any ideas? thanks in advance regards .g -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: koji failure

2016-08-23 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 08/23/2016 12:43 AM, gil wrote: > hi any idea? The task failed, but the build succeeded. You shouldn't need to worry about that. -- Mikolaj Izdebski Software Engineer, Red Hat IRC: mizdebsk -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@l