On 08/19/2016 09:51 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Interesting... it still won't give me the drop-down box to be able to
> change it.
> It's weird, because I can change
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308662
> I had assumed it was because of the lack of admin on the older branch, but
> if
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG on 2016-08-23 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
page](https://
Il 23/08/2016 00:53, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:43:28 AM CDT gil wrote:
hi any idea?
Looks like it was a bad timing issue and you should be able to submit the
build for an update. if that does fail you will need to bump and rebuild
Dennis
this was the first b
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 00:43, gil wrote:
> hi any idea?
Yes, you're trying to submit a build for a package version
that was built already. If you want a new build, you need
to bump the release, commit, push and build.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
R
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:43:28 AM CDT gil wrote:
> hi any idea?
>
Looks like it was a bad timing issue and you should be able to submit the
build for an update. if that does fail you will need to bump and rebuild
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
hi any idea?
$ fedpkg build
Building openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25 for f25-candidate
Created task: 15341683
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15341683
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:0
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 15:52 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 14:19 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2016-08-
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 14:19 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 12:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Missing expected images:
>> > >
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 14:19 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 12:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> > >
> > > Missing expected images:
> > >
> > > Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> > > Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> > >
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 12:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
>> Missing expected images:
>>
>> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
>> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>>
>> Failed openQA tests: 58/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> It looks like there wa
hi
I'm looking for reviewers for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369224
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369232
Is anybody interested in a swap?
Thanks in advance
regards
.g
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/l
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM Dominique Martinet <
dominique.marti...@cea.fr> wrote:
> Jun Aruga wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:36:48AM -0400:
> > shellcheck? you mean "sh -n something.sh"? Yes, I will do it too :)
>
> He does mean shellcheck[1].
>
> It's nice; doesn't do style check (e.g. tr
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 12:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
> Failed openQA tests: 58/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
It looks like there was a font rendering change in Rawhide somewhere
between 20160812 and
On 08/22/2016 09:31 AM, chandan kumar wrote:
> You can also take a look at bashate [ https://pypi.python.org/pypi/bashate ],
> an automated style checker for bash scripts
> to fill the same part of code review that pep8 does in most OpenStack
> projects.
I'll second the usage of 'bashate'. It's
Jun Aruga wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:36:48AM -0400:
> shellcheck? you mean "sh -n something.sh"? Yes, I will do it too :)
He does mean shellcheck[1].
It's nice; doesn't do style check (e.g. trailing spaces or whatsnot)
but catches quite a lot of errors.
[1] https://www.shellcheck.net/
--
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 11/89 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 29290 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29290
ID: 29300 Test: x86_6
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 07:40 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> FESCo discussed this briefly on Friday. There was no formal vote, but the
> general sense was that you should just go ahead and do this as described above
> (immediately, so it lands in updates-testing ASAP and will be available by the
>
Hi,
> You can also take a look at bashate [ https://pypi.python.org/pypi/bashate ],
> an automated style checker for bash scripts
> to fill the same part of code review that pep8 does in most OpenStack
> projects.
> Thanks,
Its tool looks helpful & useful for me. I would take a look at it.
Thanks
Hi,
> I'm not familiar with one, but I'd recommend using shellcheck on them to
> detect potential issues.
Thanks.
shellcheck? you mean "sh -n something.sh"? Yes, I will do it too :)
I mean such as following pages, that I just searched on internet.
https://google.github.io/styleguide/shell.xml
h
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Christopher
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:01 AM Jun Aruga wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We can see several bash (= sh on Fedora) script files under /etc such as
>> /etc/init.d/functions
>> /etc/profile
>>
>> Anyone could you tell me whether there is a commo
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:01 AM Jun Aruga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We can see several bash (= sh on Fedora) script files under /etc such as
> /etc/init.d/functions
> /etc/profile
>
> Anyone could you tell me whether there is a common style guideline (coding
> standards) to write the shell script on Feod
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2016 4:50 PM, "Andrew Lutomirski" wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> How about ordinary earlyprintk to serial?
>>
>> Try booting with nokaslr, though. There was a bug, now fixed upstream (I
>> think) that broke AMD early microcode if kaslr w
Hi,
We can see several bash (= sh on Fedora) script files under /etc such as
/etc/init.d/functions
/etc/profile
Anyone could you tell me whether there is a common style guideline (coding
standards) to write the shell script on Feodra?
Thanks,
Jun Aruga
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
On 08/22/2016 03:07 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that gnome-control-center is missing from the megaupdate ?
Yes; this is because the control center stack is missing upstream
releases for .90.
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject
Hi,
It seems that gnome-control-center is missing from the megaupdate ?
Regards,
Hans
(replying from the web-archive so no quoted context, sorry)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
11 packages were orphaned
-
system-config-date [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp
A graphical interface for modifying system date and time
https://admin.fedorapro
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On 08/22/2016 01:56 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Hello, Kalev.
> > It would've been nice if you had contacted the maintainers of affected
> > packages before renaming the python subpackages of libgexiv2:
>
> Sorry, I didn't
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 58/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 29179 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29179
ID: 29180 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso in
On 08/22/2016 01:56 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello, Kalev.
> It would've been nice if you had contacted the maintainers of affected
> packages before renaming the python subpackages of libgexiv2:
Sorry, I didn't find anything using them when I checked. My bad. Thanks
for fixing
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello, Kalev.
> It would've been nice if you had contacted the maintainers of affected
> packages before renaming the python subpackages of libgexiv2:
>
> * Mon Aug 15 2016 Kalev Lember - 0.10.4-1
> [...]
> - Rename python2 and python3 subpackages are per
Hello, Kalev.
It would've been nice if you had contacted the maintainers of affected
packages before renaming the python subpackages of libgexiv2:
* Mon Aug 15 2016 Kalev Lember - 0.10.4-1
[...]
- Rename python2 and python3 subpackages are per latest guidelines
I started getting broken dep nag-m
On 08/19/2016 09:54 AM, Kai Engert wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 09:45 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> However, pre-release Fedora is different from released Fedoras in that the
>> updates-testing repo is enabled by default on them. This means that if you
>> push
>> the ca-certificates package
32 matches
Mail list logo
