On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 15:23 +0200, Kai Engert wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 22:19 +0200, Kai Engert wrote:
> >
> > Unless we find good reasons not to do it, I suggest to push the
> > legacy
> > removals
> > to stable around 2016-09-21.
>
> I just noticed that the Fedora 25 beta freeze is schedul
On 18/08/16 02:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 14:19 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> On 18/08/16 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> Hi folks!
>>>
>>> There is a bug nominated as a Fedora 25 Alpha blocker:
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367321
>> Inte
Will test tonight and report.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:45 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 14:19 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > On 18/08/16 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks!
> > >
> > > There is a bug nominated as a Fedora 25 Alpha blocker:
> > >
> > >
Please also add https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1615
---
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 14:19 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 18/08/16 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > There is a bug nominated as a Fedora 25 Alpha blocker:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367321
> Interesting. My desktop system has an identic
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-08-12 16:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets below c
I am very busy in these weeks, but if you need other testing cases, I
have many AMD machines
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 18/08/16 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> There is a bug nominated as a Fedora 25 Alpha blocker:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367321
Interesting. My desktop system has an identical ASUS motherboard from
the reporter. The only difference is the cpu, a AMD Pheno
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 17:13 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On 8/18/16, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > There is a bug nominated as a Fedora 25 Alpha blocker:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367321
> >
> > on affected systems, it prevents boot entirely, which is obviously
Hi folks!
There is a bug nominated as a Fedora 25 Alpha blocker:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367321
on affected systems, it prevents boot entirely, which is obviously
pretty bad. But we're not sure yet how many systems would be affected
by the bug. So we're looking for more feed
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The Filesystem Layout section of the guidelines was simplified and
outdated information was removed.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout
* http
Release status of the Fedora 25 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting is NO-GO.
Due to missing RC and present blockers [1] in the Fedora 25 Alpha, the
decision is to slip the Fedora 25 Alpha release for one week. There is
going to be one more Go/No-Go meeting the next Thursday, August 25th,
2016 at 5:00PM UTC to
Done, thanks!
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On 08/18/2016 11:41 AM, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm trying to get some help with a couple of BZs that look odd to me.
>>
>> It looks like these two bugs are somehow stuck in an ON_QA state by a
On 08/18/2016 11:41 AM, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to get some help with a couple of BZs that look odd to me.
>
> It looks like these two bugs are somehow stuck in an ON_QA state by an
> obsolete bodhi update. There was an update which resolved them that
> was pushed to st
Hello all,
I'm trying to get some help with a couple of BZs that look odd to me.
It looks like these two bugs are somehow stuck in an ON_QA state by an
obsolete bodhi update. There was an update which resolved them that
was pushed to stable a while ago. The two bugs are:
https://bugzilla.redhat.
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 09:28 -0400, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> * Guidelines suggest to use "BZComponent" but upstream label
> guidelines mention
> "com.redhat.component"; I would suggest using the latter one
> (disclaimer: I
> participated actively in the early history of changes in the label
> n
Quoting Adam Miller (2016-05-31 19:12:47)
> Hello all,
> I had previously sent out a RFC email about a month ago asking for
> feedback on the Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines[0].
>
> I was asked by FESCo to start a new thread so that this can be
> discussed further on the devel mailing l
On 08/12/2016 11:43 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 08/12/2016 11:36 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> gprolog has been FTBFS for a while due to a segfault on i686, see this
>> build [1] for an example. I followed advice on [2] to add some debugging
>> flags, not sure if they really help thou
18 matches
Mail list logo
