Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * #1592 - Redefinition of what constitutes a secondary/alternate
> ~ architecture in Fedora (sgallagh, 16:04:18)
> ~ * AGREED: FESCo approves the new alternative architectures plan (+7,
> ~0, -0) (sgallagh, 16:11:29)
Sigh! So the proposal to break Fedora got unan
Ok, Version at head of beignet repository builds:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15248778
though I could not get 1.1.2 to build. One might be able to make a patch
to be able to get 1.1.2 to build by comparing it with the version in the
repository, or perhaps wait for 1.1.3.
> So, I misunderstood this issue. (I'll blame the cold medicine)
>
> In this case the problem is that arm images are made with
> appliance-creator from appliance-tools. That in turn uses livecd-tools
> (the old way we used to make live media but no longer do in favor of
> livemedia-creator from lor
So, I misunderstood this issue. (I'll blame the cold medicine)
In this case the problem is that arm images are made with
appliance-creator from appliance-tools. That in turn uses livecd-tools
(the old way we used to make live media but no longer do in favor of
livemedia-creator from lorax).
So,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Benson Muite
wrote:
> Beignet is Intel specific. HSA is upcoming and looks like might be able to
> include it for other architectures:
>
> http://portablecl.org/docs/html/hsa_status.html#evaluation-setup
>
> Not sure if there is some other way for library to select
Beignet is Intel specific. HSA is upcoming and looks like might be able
to include it for other architectures:
http://portablecl.org/docs/html/hsa_status.html#evaluation-setup
Not sure if there is some other way for library to select an OpenCL runtime.
On 08/13/2016 07:16 PM, Igor Gnatenko wro
Actually you don't need to build for each platform some library.
Platform should be chosen at runtime.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Benson Muite
wrote:
> Thanks for the welcome, still learning how to write spec files. Working
> initially on clrng using beignet on x86_64, then want to add clff
Thanks for the welcome, still learning how to write spec files. Working
initially on clrng using beignet on x86_64, then want to add clfft,
clblas and possibly clsparse from clmath
(https://github.com/clMathLibraries).
What would be a reasonable name for the package? At the moment have
clrng-
Welcome aboard!
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Benson Muite
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am interested in making it easier to use integrated GPUs within Fedora,
> particularly using OpenCL. Initial package working on can be found at:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fed500/clrng-intel/
Unfortuna
Hi,
Am interested in making it easier to use integrated GPUs within Fedora,
particularly using OpenCL. Initial package working on can be found at:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fed500/clrng-intel/
Thanks,
Benson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedor
Dear friends.
I need to fix this ticket https://fedorahosted.org/design-team/ticket/402.
Is about resize images from http://fedoraplanet.org/heads/
As you knows the images are taken from file .planet .
This file has this structure:
[http://yourname.wordpress.com/tag/fedora/feed/]
name = Your Name
11 matches
Mail list logo
