On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:29:19PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 22:10:14 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > I might have imagined this, but I'm sure I read that the Fedora
> > Project reserves all/some #fedora-* channels on FreeNode.
> >
> > Anyway if this is true, I'd l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks Igor. Using your suggestion help building the embree package now
submitted for review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364618
Upstream does not support x86 architecture hence the use of
ExclusiveArch unless there is another
altern
There's a separate natural scrolling setting for mouse and touchpad. Did
you change the right one?
Regards
Richard
On 5 Aug 2016 10:05 pm, "Roger Wells" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the Mouse & Touchpad settings dialog where one can select/deselect
> Natural Scrolling there is no difference between
Welcome.
_Seja bem-vindo._
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 22:10:14 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> I might have imagined this, but I'm sure I read that the Fedora
> Project reserves all/some #fedora-* channels on FreeNode.
>
> Anyway if this is true, I'd like to request that the Fedora Project
> reserves #fedora-riscv
>
> The qu
Hi, my name is Frederico Lima, fas: fredlima,
I'm from Brazil
I'm a new Fedora package maintainer,
My package was pushed to stable repo, its name is Quake 2.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/quake2/
I use Fedora now but before I've used Suse, Slackware and Debian distros.
I might have imagined this, but I'm sure I read that the Fedora
Project reserves all/some #fedora-* channels on FreeNode.
Anyway if this is true, I'd like to request that the Fedora Project
reserves #fedora-riscv
The question is .. how?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat ht
Hello,
In the Mouse & Touchpad settings dialog where one can select/deselect
Natural Scrolling there is no difference between settings. The
view/window is moved around the contents, i.e. not "Natural Scrolling"
The machine is a Thinkpad x240, OS is F24, just upgraded from F23 a day
or so ago.
T
On 08/05/2016 10:31 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
>> b) fedora-review is run automatically by some bot/script just after review
>> have been submitted.
>
> Can a new utility be written for this as I don't think that long
> fedora-review output is helpful? Most checks have no markings in them.
> How can
On 2016-08-05 05:29, Peter Robinson wrote:
On the subject of RISC-V, I'm still plugging away at this. It's
rather slow going, but you can take a look at:
http://git.annexia.org/?p=fedora-riscv.git;a=summary
There is nothing much usable at the moment, and many stumbling blocks.
Yes, but thi
Hi,
this change is indeed happening only in F26 and later. There are no
plans to do the rename in earlier releases.
However, I'm not sure where the "0%{?rhel} > 7" condition in your spec
sample came from. I have no idea when the rename will get to RHEL, and I
would definitely warn about such
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 36/88 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386)
ID: 27542 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 08:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 14:08 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> >
> > Missing expected images:
> >
> > Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
> > Xfce raw-xz armhfp
> > Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> > Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> > Minimal raw-xz armhfp
> >
QA. I'll try and figure out what's going on and fix it, then re-run
the tests. In the mean time you can see more correct results on staging
(which is still working fine...), which look mostly like yesterday's:
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&
Hi Steve,
On 05/08/16 15:37, Steve Jenkins wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Ondřej Lysoněk mailto:olyso...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
on Friday, August 5, I will rebuild the sendmail package for
rawhide, because of a rename of sendmail-devel to
sendmail-milter-devel. This i
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had
> very interesting follow-up discussion.
>
> We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to implement and
> may improve the process a lot. I am posting it
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 68/88 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386)
ID: 27436 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had
> very interesting follow-up discussion.
>
> We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to implement
> and may improve the process a lot. I am posting it here so more people
> can see
I have a strong opinion over this
All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't matter the level.
And why i think of this ?
Two simple reasons:
- The packager abandoned the package, because several reasons, and then is
far away from Fedora systems for some time
- The packager is actively using Fedora
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:14:02AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:41:56 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
> > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
> >
> > https://admin.fed
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:14:02AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:41:56 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:43:40PM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This morning, during the automation workshop, I had the occasi
>> [1]
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures
>
> I skimmed all this and I'm still a bit confused.
>
> Will there be one Koji instance compiling for every (current primary +
> current secondary) arch? Or will there be two instances, one for all
> primary
>> We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64)
>> are handled
>> in terms of "primary" vs "secondary". The definition of what is
>> primary or secondary
>> is already handled more in terms of the build artifact outputs (images,
>> LiveCDs,
>> installers, containers etc)
Hi,
On 29/07/16 14:26, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote:
Hi,
on Friday, August 5, I will rebuild the sendmail package for rawhide,
because of a rename of sendmail-devel to sendmail-milter-devel. This is
due to [1]. Please change BuildRequires and Requires of your packages
accordingly.
List of know affecte
>> All the details of the proposal along with FAQ have been put on a wiki
>> page here[1]
>> so please go and read it and ask any questions that aren't answered in
>> the FAQ here.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>>
>> [1]
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures
>>
Hi,
Is already for some time (a few weeks) that I have no news,
I did request to become co maintainer for this package:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jboss-ejb3-ext-api/
These packages are required for upgrade/import wildfly 10+
But until now I have not had any response fr
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:41:56 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:43:40PM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This morning, during the automation workshop, I had the occasion of
> > speaking about this with Pingou and Threebean.
> > Thanks to Ping
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:30:38 +0200
Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 08/04/2016 05:07 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > All the details of the proposal along with FAQ have been put on a
> > wiki page here[1]
> > so please go and read it and ask any questions that aren't answered
> > in the FAQ here.
>
> For
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had
> very interesting follow-up discussion.
>
> We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to implement and
> may improve the process a lot. I am posti
On 08/04/2016 05:07 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
All the details of the proposal along with FAQ have been put on a wiki
page here[1]
so please go and read it and ask any questions that aren't answered in
the FAQ here.
For rawhide, ppc.koji is currently behind primary by two weeks (or even
more).
Dne 5.8.2016 v 09:32 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we
> had very interesting follow-up discussion.
>
> We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to
> implement and may improve the process a lot. I am posting it here
I had the talk [1] about Fedora Sponsorship process at Flock. And we had
very interesting follow-up discussion.
We come up with several improvements, which should be easy to implement
and may improve the process a lot. I am posting it here so more people
can see that and join the discussion.
32 matches
Mail list logo
