Re: finish retirement of sysvinit-only packages Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-29)

2016-07-30 Thread Parag Nemade
Hi, On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sáb, 2016-07-30 at 22:29 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 04:18:18 +0100 >> Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >> > >> > why we need retire sysvinit-only packages ? >> Because they have had 10+ releases to adjust and haven't. >>

Re: finish retirement of sysvinit-only packages Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-29)

2016-07-30 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sáb, 2016-07-30 at 22:29 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 04:18:18 +0100 > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > why we need retire sysvinit-only packages ?  > Because they have had 10+ releases to adjust and haven't.  > > > > > is not suppose systemd > > support sysvinit and why don

Re: finish retirement of sysvinit-only packages Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-29)

2016-07-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 04:18:18 +0100 Sérgio Basto wrote: > why we need retire sysvinit-only packages ? Because they have had 10+ releases to adjust and haven't. > is not suppose systemd > support sysvinit and why don't you fixed the packages like you will do > for nagios ? systemd does support

Re: finish retirement of sysvinit-only packages Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-29)

2016-07-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 04:18:18AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sex, 2016-07-29 at 10:55 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > * #1605 finish retirement of sysvinit-only packages  (nirik, > > 16:24:51) > >   * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1605   (nirik, > > 16:24:51) > >   * AGREED: retir

finish retirement of sysvinit-only packages Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-29)

2016-07-30 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sex, 2016-07-29 at 10:55 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * #1605 finish retirement of sysvinit-only packages  (nirik, > 16:24:51) >   * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1605   (nirik, > 16:24:51) >   * AGREED: retire packages on list aside nagios (which must be fixed > by >     alpha) and

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

2016-07-30 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 02:10:32PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: > >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > >> > The actual work of pvmove is not done by the command you run; that sets >

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

2016-07-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >> > The actual work of pvmove is not done by the command you run; that sets >> > it up and it is run in the background (by a kernel thread). All th

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

2016-07-30 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > > The actual work of pvmove is not done by the command you run; that sets > > it up and it is run in the background (by a kernel thread). All the > > command you run does then is periodically check and p

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

2016-07-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: >> Maybe someone can beat me to a test involving pvmove from one disk to >> another, initiated in GNOME Terminal, and logging out before it >> completes. I'd love to know what state it puts the system in...

update after microcode_ctl-2.1-10.fc23.x86_64 with big problems

2016-07-30 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi,  after read the notes on  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-784d5526d8 For those with Skylake CPUs, please note that there may be instability with a recent microcode update. Read https://www.happyassassin.net/2016 /07/07/psa-failure-to-boot-after-kernel-update-on-skylake-syst

Fedora Rawhide-20160730.n.0 compose check report

2016-07-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 58/80 (x86_64), 14/16 (i386) ID: 26290 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@u

Fedora 25-20160730.n.0 compose check report

2016-07-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 60/79 (x86_64), 14/16 (i386) ID: 26386 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@

Re: Orphaned packages seeking new point of contact

2016-07-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
> On Jul 29, 2016, at 7:34 PM, Athmane Madjoudj > wrote: > > Hi, > >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> libuv (el6) >> libuv (epel7) >> libuv (f23) >> libuv (f24) >> libuv (f25) >> libuv (master) > > I took libuv since I have a pkg that depends on it. > > @sgallagh: Yo

jboss-ejb3-ext-api rights

2016-07-30 Thread gil
Hi, can you give to me some rights for jboss-ejb3-ext-api [1] ? we need to upgrade to 2.2.0.Final for wildfly 10+ import/upgrade see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/WildFly Thanks in advance Regards .g [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jboss-ejb3-ext-api/ -- devel mailin

Re: Orphaned packages seeking new point of contact

2016-07-30 Thread Till Hofmann
On 07/29/2016 07:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I have orphaned the following packages / branches and they need a new point of > contact to stay in the Fedora or EPEL Collections: > > gprolog (epel7) > gprolog (f23) > gprolog (f24) > gprolog (f25) > gprolog (master) I've taken gprolog. @Roberto