Hi,
Is anyone interested in a review swap for cmap-resources (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350260)? This should be pretty
straightforward, I'd be willing to take any small package in return.
Note that this is a rename of several other packages (cmap-cns1-6,
cmap-gb1-5, cmap-ident
On Sex, 2016-07-01 at 21:40 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III said:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 00:48:14 +0200,
> > Michael Scherer wrote:
> > >
> > > So that's rather fast to explain. Libero.it use this SPF record:
> > Isn't SPF tied to the envelope sender addr
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> To keep this off-list as much as possible, the rant is here:
>
> http://reiisi.blogspot.com/2016/07/to-gil-tim-fedora-et-al.html
>
> (The blame lies elsewhere. I wish I had the network and social cred to
> get a real movement started, away from t
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 02:08:48PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> So the thing is, I'm genuinely curious why you would want to run a
> desktop OS on either architecture.
For the same reason Fedora puts out releases targeting those
architechures? :)
I'm not wedded to any particular hardware archite
On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 07:14:54 -0700
Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> The web UI would not let me push my update to stable despite having
> plenty of karma
> (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/fish-2.3.0-2.fc24). The
> options were "Edit" and "Unpush".
>
> I was able to request stable from the com
The web UI would not let me push my update to stable despite having
plenty of karma
(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/fish-2.3.0-2.fc24). The
options were "Edit" and "Unpush".
I was able to request stable from the command line, though:
$ bodhi -u amluto -R stable fish-2.3.0-2.fc24
No hand
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 21/78 (x86_64), 2/16 (i386)
ID: 24418 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fe
On Qui, 2016-06-30 at 17:42 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 06/30/2016 05:38 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>
> >
> > Cut & paste example code solution from lvm2:
> >
> > #if !defined(__GLIBC__) || (__GLIBC__ < 2) || ((__GLIBC__ == 2) &&
> > (__GLIBC_MINOR__ < 23))
> > /* readdir_r is deprecate
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160701.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160702.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 72
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.27 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00
- Original Message -
> So, the "problem" with --majorver-provides occurs when either of the
> two conditions are true:
>
> * There's no dependency on a specific version of the Python ABI
> ("python(abi) = X.Y") in the modules
> * There's more than one package providing a python implementat
I would like to fix %python-provide.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351136
I mentioned PIL case there as well.
-Igor Gnatenko
On Jul 2, 2016 11:27 AM, "Sandro Mani" wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm looking at modernizing the python-pillow spec and have a question
> about %python_provide:
Hi
I'm looking at modernizing the python-pillow spec and have a question
about %python_provide: The python{2,3}-pillow also provide the legacy
python{,2,3}-imaging names, how should this be handled with
%python_provide? I.e.
%package -n python2-pillow
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python
12 matches
Mail list logo
