> I've failed to launch the application properly under X.org and Wayland using
> the
> launcher icon in GNOME shell.
>
> But when I switched to Wayland, I executed the `firefox` command from
> "Terminix"
> and it worked under XWayland with no regressions so far (I didn't notice any
> other
> th
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG on 2016-06-28 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
page](https://
On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 18:57 -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
> Here is a new wiki page. [1]
>
>
> Please edit this first edit.
Thanks Tom! I don't think creating a new page is the best idea, though.
Editing the existing page would be better, because there will already
be all kinds of links to it al
Here is a new wiki page. [1]
Please edit this first edit.
Tom Gilliard
satellit
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Livemedia-creator-_How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
Hi,
I just built PHP 7.0.8 in rawhide, and mass rebuild ~40 extensions.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php70
Removed extensions
ereg
jsonc
mssql
mysql
mongo
xhprof
mysqlnd-ms
mysqlnd-qc
xcache
Rebuilt exte
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 13/83 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386)
ID: 23925 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/23925
ID: 23932 T
Dne 27.6.2016 v 15:46 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:11:38 +0200
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> This doesn't sound right. What is wrong with Rawhide composes?
> It was a config issue with the way composes were named.
>
> I noticed it this weekend and Dennis already fixed it.
>
> Tod
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:11:38 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> This doesn't sound right. What is wrong with Rawhide composes?
It was a config issue with the way composes were named.
I noticed it this weekend and Dennis already fixed it.
Todays (and moving forward) reports should be working as expect
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
4 packages were orphaned
apcupsd [el6, el5] was orphaned by mhlavink
APC UPS Power Control Daemon for Linux
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/apcupsd
blu
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160626.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160627.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 29
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 53.03 KiB
Size of dropped packages
perl-App-GitHooks-1.8.0-1.fc25 changes license from (GPL3+) to (GPL+ or
Artistic)
Jitka
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
This doesn't sound right. What is wrong with Rawhide composes?
Vít
Dne 26.6.2016 v 13:30 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
> OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160623.n.0
> NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160623.n.0
>
> = SUMMARY =
> Added images:0
> Dropped images: 0
> Added packages: 0
> D
I have just updated the Fedora Developer Portal with the following content.
Big thanks to everyone who contributed!
What's new:
- Eclipse
https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tools/eclipse/about.html
by Alexander Kurtakov
- Maintain and Improve
https://developer.fedoraproject.org/deploymen
I'll have a closer look at copr's features and its usability for building
modules soon. There's a taiga card especially for this:
http://taiga.fedorainfracloud.org/project/modularity/us/554
> And very soon it will allow defining the package set in buildchroot completely
Do you have an estimate
I did update from 2.30.2 to 2.31.0 and didn't notice that there was
API breakage, but soname was still -> 0. Upstream breaks API each
X.Y.0 release so I did some changes in their buildsystem and now
soname is -> 2.31 and will change each X.Y.0 release.
Looks like that nothing except SuperTuxKart u
On 06/24/2016 06:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Today's Rawhide compose contained no images at all (which is why there
> are no openQA tests for it, in case you wondered). At least some of the
> compose fails (I haven't checked them all) seem to be caused by a
> libselinux bug:
>
> https://bugzil
16 matches
Mail list logo