Hi everyone!
The submission deadline for System Wide Changes of Fedora 25 [1] is
coming pretty soon - in three weeks on July 5th. Alpha release of
Fedora 25 is planned on August 23rd.
Please, submit your System Wide Changes by this deadline, earlier
better. As the deadline applies for System Wide
Hi Hamish Brunker
Check out the documentation at the link below
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Installation_Guide/
On Jun 14, 2016 9:49 AM, "Hamish Brunker"
wrote:
>
> I am new to this so please accept my apology if I am in the wrong area:
> I have downloaded Fedora 23 onto
I am new to this so please accept my apology if I am in the wrong area:
I have downloaded Fedora 23 onto an "acer" laptop that is presently running
windows 8. I would like to clobber windows and just have Fedora on the lap top.
How do I achieve this?
The download of Fedora has worked but I dont kn
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG on 2016-06-14 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting for the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
page](https://
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 10:11 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> Could you put this on a page in Fedora wiki and possibly add a link
> in WebKitGTK+ package description and README file?
Hi,
Just want to let you know I am planning to document it on the WebKit
wiki and also downstream som
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
> On Jun 13, 2016 10:09 PM, "Cody Hiar"
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > My name is Cody Hiar and I'm dude that spends almost all my time during
> the week on the command line. I've always wanted to start contributing to
> open source and the only thing that has stayed constant through my limited
>
Welcome on board!
-Igor Gnatenko
On Jun 13, 2016 10:09 PM, "Cody Hiar"
wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> My name is Cody Hiar and I'm dude that spends almost all my time during
the week on the command line. I've always wanted to start contributing to
open source and the only thing that has stayed constant th
Hello!
My name is Cody Hiar and I'm dude that spends almost all my time during the
week on the command line. I've always wanted to start contributing to open
source and the only thing that has stayed constant through my limited career so
far is working on Linux so here I am trying to learn some
Hi,
the 3.21.3 release of evolution-data-server changes soname version for
camel, due to some API changes in that sub-library.
I will rebuild packages for which I have commit rights, the same as I
can help with the API change fixes, thus feel free to ping me or drop
an e-mail. I do not thi
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/17 (i386)
ID: 22387 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/22387
ID: 22394 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://o
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
3 packages were orphaned
python-pytest-capturelog [master] was orphaned by raphgro
py.test plugin to capture log messages
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packa
On 06/13/2016 03:52 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:09:33AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
glibc upstream, during development of the 2.24 release, introduced new
symbol versions recvmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmsg@GLIBC_2.24 (and
recvmmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmmsg@GLIBC_2.24 on 64-bit
Dear all,
I have retired the sectool package in rawhide. It will still be available in
Fedora 24 because the f24 branch is past the final freeze and packages cannot
be retired there.
Retiring of this package is long overdue. The sectool project is no longer
developed nor maintained upstream. A
OLD: Fedora-24-20160612.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160613.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 10
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 17/79 (x86_64), 6/17 (i386)
ID: 22206 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/22206
ID: 22207
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:37:26PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 06/13/2016 03:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >I tried just installing glibc 2.23.90-22, but even after a reboot that
> >did not appear to fix libvirt.
>
> If you don't rebuild, the code will use the GLIBC_2.24 symbols,
> whic
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:09:33AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> glibc upstream, during development of the 2.24 release, introduced new
> symbol versions recvmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmsg@GLIBC_2.24 (and
> recvmmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmmsg@GLIBC_2.24 on 64-bit architectures), in order
> to fix some minor PO
On 06/13/2016 03:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I tried just installing glibc 2.23.90-22, but even after a reboot that
did not appear to fix libvirt.
If you don't rebuild, the code will use the GLIBC_2.24 symbols, which
have the POSIX conformance enhancement.
Florian
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:09:33AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> glibc upstream, during development of the 2.24 release, introduced
> new symbol versions recvmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmsg@GLIBC_2.24 (and
> recvmmsg@GLIBC_2.24, sendmmsg@GLIBC_2.24 on 64-bit architectures),
> in order to fix some minor PO
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160612.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160613.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 217
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00
On 06/13/2016 10:35 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> I will take it. Feel free to make me point of contact.
Thanks, I've re-assigned the package in pkgdb.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/ad
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
I don't have time to maintain xmlrpc-c, so I'm going to orphan it within
next few weeks, unless someone volunteers to take it.
Note that as a transitive dependency of Anaconda, xmlrpc-c is a
"critical path package".
It is also a critical dependency o
I will take it. Feel free to make me point of contact.
-Igor Gnatenko
On Jun 13, 2016 10:28 AM, "Mikolaj Izdebski" wrote:
> I don't have time to maintain xmlrpc-c, so I'm going to orphan it within
> next few weeks, unless someone volunteers to take it.
>
> Note that as a transitive dependency of
I don't have time to maintain xmlrpc-c, so I'm going to orphan it within
next few weeks, unless someone volunteers to take it.
Note that as a transitive dependency of Anaconda, xmlrpc-c is a
"critical path package".
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing li
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 08:11 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Active porting efforts are underway for Evolution (which will take
> care of the mass of evolution-data-server dependencies like gnome-
> shell and gdm)
Hi,
I think it's a very important detail, because if I remove
the --recursi
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 11:39 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> There's no transition documentation. Basically, you want to make sure
> your package builds when switching the pkg-config version in
> configure.ac to webkit2gtk-4.0.
Hi,
feel free to check out what the evolution-data-server doe
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 24.
The meeting is scheduled at 17:00 UTC. Please follow the [FedoCal]
link to find the time of the meeting in your time-zone.
[FedoCal] https://apps.fedoraproject.o
28 matches
Mail list logo
