jboss-logmanager license changes

2016-05-26 Thread gil
Hi now jboss-logmanager package changes from LGPLv2+ to ASL 2.0 regards .g -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-26 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Guys, this issue has been fixed in F24's PackageKit (libhif actually). -Igor Gnatenko On May 27, 2016 8:33 AM, "Dan Book" wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia > wrote: > >> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:02 AM, M

jboss-modules license changes

2016-05-26 Thread gil
Hi now jboss-modules package changes from LGPLv2+ to ASL 2.0 and xpp regards .g -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-26 Thread Dan Book
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Michal Luscon > wrote: > >> > >> This might have been caused by > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 > >> > >> . > >> >

jboss-parent license changes

2016-05-26 Thread gil
Hi now jboss-parent package changes from Public Domain to Creative Commons Zero 1.0 Universal (CC0) regards .g -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-26 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Michal Luscon wrote: >> >> This might have been caused by >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 >> >> . >> >> Michal > > > Yes, Kevin mentioned that and it is in the other thread (corebird)

Fedora 24-20160526.n.1 compose check report

2016-05-26 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 4/66 (x86_64), 3/16 (i386) ID: 19127 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL:

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160526.n.1 changes

2016-05-26 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-24-20160524.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160526.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 24 Added packages: 10 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 117 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 7.04 MiB Size of dropped packages:2.37 MiB

Package Orphanarium: davfs2 and pybluez

2016-05-26 Thread Will Woods
Hello friends, The time has come for me to admit that I'm not maintaining these packages anymore, and either let someone else do it, or let them retire. I've handed davfs2 over to the EPEL maintainer, but they might not want to be primary maintainer, so feel free to get in touch if you'd be willi

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-26 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Michal Luscon wrote: > This might have been caused by > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 > > . > > Michal > Yes, Kevin mentioned that and it is in the other thread (corebird). I'm just wondering if this is something that will be resolved with

Re: Fedora lists From munging/DMARC (Was: audio problems)

2016-05-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 23 May 2016 16:42:05 +0200 Dominique Martinet wrote: ...snip... > The question is, should fedora's lists be configured to rewrite the > fromĀ ? I'm pretty sure mailman 3.1 can handle it, if we want it to. > > I haven't seen any discussion about this, has it ever been brought up? > Do the

Re: DNF Issue, packages being incorrectly removed - was: Re: corebird

2016-05-26 Thread Michal Luscon
Below is the output of dnf autoremove from my system. Am I correctly interpreting this that dnf thinks that all these packages can be removed? If that is the case, I would think we have a serious issue. Even if this issue has been identified and corrected going forward, there is a big mess to

Re: Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-05-18)

2016-05-26 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:01 AM, wrote: > ghc-hakyll petersen, haskell-sig, mathstuf 12 > weeks ago > I would like to keep Hakyll in Fedora but unfortunately I think this can't be easily fixed for f24, due to the version bump of pandoc and old version of network we cu