Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting
Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-05-06 16:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets below c
= Proposed System Wide Change: Perl 5.24 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.24
Change owner(s):
* Jitka Plesníková
* Petr Písař
== Detailed Description ==
New perl is released every year and updates containing mainly bug
fixes follow during the year. The 5.24.0 version is stable rel
At the second Fedora 24 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting [1][2] that just ended,
has been agreed by QA, Release Engineering and Development
representatives to go live with the Fedora 24 Beta.
Fedora 24 Beta will be publicly available on May 10, 2016. The
official release time is 14:00 UTC.
Meeting details
On 2016-05-05 10:59, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
I would think that it requiring S3TC would be more of a blocker. But
then again, maybe it's possible for someone to cook up their own game
content that doesn't use compressed textures, but I don't see that as
being particularly useful.
Is S2TC a
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I am hereby orphaning the git-cola package. (I will be pushing the buttons
> in pkgdb right after sending this message.) I simply do not have the time
> to keep up with the upstream releases of this package anymore. (It is
> already 3 releases behind.)
>
> Both the EPEL maint
On 05/05/2016 07:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am hereby orphaning the git-cola package. (I will be pushing the buttons
> in pkgdb right after sending this message.) I simply do not have the time to
> keep up with the upstream releases of this package anymore. (It is already 3
> releas
Hi,
I am hereby orphaning the git-cola package. (I will be pushing the buttons
in pkgdb right after sending this message.) I simply do not have the time to
keep up with the upstream releases of this package anymore. (It is already 3
releases behind.)
Both the EPEL maintainers have already requ
Hi all,
Logs for today's IRC meeting are now available at:
Summary:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-05-05/modularity_
wg_weekly_meeting.2016-05-05-15.02.html
Full logs:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-05-05/modularity_
wg_weekly_meeting.2016-05-05-15.0
> "TC" == Tom Callaway writes:
TC> That's a very strange situation, but I don't think it would affect
TC> inclusion of openmw in Fedora.
I would think that it requiring S3TC would be more of a blocker. But
then again, maybe it's possible for someone to cook up their own game
content that do
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 05/02/2016 01:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> There is strong engineering value in having two releases per year:
>> release early, release often. There are many projects that develop
>> through Fedora that get thrown into disarray when our cycle gets too far
>>
Hi,
due to a bug in Copr code some projects shared a GPG key with some other Copr
project.
We informed the owners of those projects and we resigned all packages in those
projects
by new GPG key.
These projects were affected by one bug [1]:
@pdc/pdc-test
nb/keepassx
And these by another bug [2]
On 05/05/2016 08:07 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>
>>> There also seems to be an agreement not to build the software on some
>>> platforms in place, that isn't reflected in the license, but might
>>> attract a lawsuit if someone did.
>>
>> This is particularly concerning. I'd like to better understa
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/65 (x86_64), 3/16 (i386)
ID: 16108 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/16108
ID: 16111 Test: x86_64 Server
OLD: Fedora-24-20160504.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160505.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 16
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:5.48 MiB
Size of
perl-Tree-1.08-1.fc25 changed license from
((GPL+ or Artistic) and Artistic 2.0) to (GPL+ or Artistic).
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
There also seems to be an agreement not to build the software on some
platforms in place, that isn't reflected in the license, but might
attract a lawsuit if someone did.
This is particularly concerning. I'd like to better understand that
situation before giving openmw the all-clear.
Unless
Dne 5.5.2016 v 06:07 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> There will be an outage starting at 2016-05-05 08:00 UTC, which will
> last approximately 6 hours.
The outage is over now.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
OK, I'll take the epel branches for this package as well.
Jos.
On 05/02/2016 12:00 PM, nob...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Change in package status over the last 168 hours
>
>
> 32 packages were orphaned
> -
> pyproj [el
Hello everyone,
I hope this is the correct list. OpenERP 6 and 7 are in Fedora. I am
working on making some open source modules for OpenERP/Odoo and for a
long time I have put off installing Odoo, in part because it isn't
packaged for Fedora. I am currently working on fixing this, at least so
that
19 matches
Mail list logo
