Planned Outage: Copr upgrade - 2016-05-05 08:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2016-05-05 08:00 UTC, which will last approximately 6 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-05-05 08:00 UTC' Reason for outage: Upgrade all copr packages to newer ve

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Policy change on emulators

On 05/04/2016 08:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: >> On 05/04/2016 04:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>> What about things like openmw that in theory can be run with free >>> assests, but for which there really isn't anything beyond a demo for >>> other

Re: Policy change on emulators

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 05/04/2016 04:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> What about things like openmw that in theory can be run with free >> assests, but for which there really isn't anything beyond a demo for >> other than the assests from a proprietary game? > > T

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Tuesday, May 3, 2016 11:32:22 AM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016 11:22:30 -0500 > > Adam Miller wrote: > > Collection of RPMs is fine, the goal is just not to ship non-rpm code > > or content yet outside of Docker-ized application control scripts > > where needed/applicable. > > o

Re: Self Introduction: Michael Cullen

On 05/02/2016 08:44 PM, Michael Cullen wrote: > Hi! > > I've just submitted a review request here > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344 > > I'm a software developer from the UK currently living and working in > London on Linux-based set top box middleware. I've been a Linux user f

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2016-05-05 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2016-05-05 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2016-05-05 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2016-05-05 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2016-05-05 1

Re: Policy change on emulators

On 05/04/2016 04:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > What about things like openmw that in theory can be run with free > assests, but for which there really isn't anything beyond a demo for > other than the assests from a proprietary game? The assets should not be a problem unless they're tied directl

Re: Policy change on emulators

On 05/04/2016 05:20 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > Does this mean that most console emulators (i.e. > NES/SNES/MasterSystem/Genesis emulators) are now acceptable in Fedora? Subject to the guidelines as written, yes. A clear example of something that would now be permitted would be MAME (because it

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On 4 May 2016 at 21:48, Adam Miller wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, 3 May 2016 11:22:30 -0500 > > Adam Miller wrote: > > > >> Collection of RPMs is fine, the goal is just not to ship non-rpm code > >> or content yet outside of Docker-ized application con

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016 11:22:30 -0500 > Adam Miller wrote: > >> Collection of RPMs is fine, the goal is just not to ship non-rpm code >> or content yet outside of Docker-ized application control scripts >> where needed/applicable. > > ok. >> >> It

Re: Policy change on emulators

What about things like openmw that in theory can be run with free assests, but for which there really isn't anything beyond a demo for other than the assests from a proprietary game? There also seems to be an agreement not to build the software on some platforms in place, that isn't reflected

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora 24 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting - II

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora 24 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting - II on 2016-05-05 from 17:30:00 to 19:30:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important meeting, wherein we shall d

Re: Fedora 24 Beta 1.6 compose check report

On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 15:16 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > > Failed openQA tests: 5/67 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386) > > ID: 15851 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_selinux > URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.o

Fedora 24 Beta 1.6 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 5/67 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386) ID: 15851 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15851 ID: 15852 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_st

Fedora 24-20160504.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 5/68 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386) ID: 16010 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/16010 ID: 16025 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https:

Re: Open Watcom was Re: Policy change on emulators

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > >> They say their reference C compiler is the Open Watcom C, which seems >> to be distributed under this license: >> ftp://ftp.openwatcom.org/pub/license.txt . The license seems complicated >> and

Re: rpm: %patch needs --fuzz

On 2016-05-04 9:25 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Neal Becker wrote: In an rpm .spec I need a patch with more fuzz %patch macro doesn't seem to accept --fuzz=xxx What's a good solution? Clean the patch up so it applies without fuzz. That is always the best solution.

Re: rpm: %patch needs --fuzz

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > In an rpm .spec I need a patch with more fuzz > > %patch macro > > doesn't seem to accept --fuzz=xxx > > What's a good solution? > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160504.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160503.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160504.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:8 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of

Re: rpm: %patch needs --fuzz

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > In an rpm .spec I need a patch with more fuzz > > %patch macro > > doesn't seem to accept --fuzz=xxx > > What's a good solution? Clean the patch up so it applies without fuzz. That is always the best solution. The alternative is to literally

rpm: %patch needs --fuzz

In an rpm .spec I need a patch with more fuzz %patch macro doesn't seem to accept --fuzz=xxx What's a good solution? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Open Watcom was Re: Policy change on emulators

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > They say their reference C compiler is the Open Watcom C, which seems > to be distributed under this license: > ftp://ftp.openwatcom.org/pub/license.txt . The license seems complicated > and probably non-free in Fedora terms. There is a Debian thread about

Re: Policy change on emulators

On 05/04/2016 05:20 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Tom Callaway > wrote: > > Some emulators (applications which emulate another platform) are not > permitted for inclusion in Fedora. These rules will help you determine >

Fedora Rawhide-20160504.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 12/58 (x86_64), 4/15 (i386) ID: 15933 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fed

Re: Policy change on emulators

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > Some emulators (applications which emulate another platform) are not > permitted for inclusion in Fedora. These rules will help you determine > whether an emulator is acceptable for Fedora. > > * Emulators which depend on firmware or ROM files

Fedora 24 Beta 1.6 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 7/67 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386) ID: 15851 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15851 ID: 15852 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_st