[Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Candidate Beta-1.6 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate Beta-1.6 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the cu

Re: Policy change on emulators

On May 3, 2016 8:01 PM, "Neal Gompa" wrote: > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:23:45PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > >> Are the FreeDOS sources under a Fedora-acceptable license? > > > > Probably needs review. It's mostly GPLv2, but some of the

Re: Policy change on emulators

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:23:45PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: >> Are the FreeDOS sources under a Fedora-acceptable license? > > Probably needs review. It's mostly GPLv2, but some of the included > software has various other licenses. See >

[Modularity] WG meeting time

Hi, Unfortunately, I heard from some of the new voting members that the current Modularity WG meeting time is not doable for them. Please use the link below to help us figure out a new time. http://whenisgood.net/hzd7x2b Langdon PS: haven't actually used whenisgood to schedule a meeting bef

Fedora 24 Beta status

Hey folks! Quick F24 Beta status update. 1.4 has mostly held up to testing, however I found some issues in everyone's favourite area (RAID) yesterday. One of them seems to be getting traction as a blocker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331630 I kinda expected everyone to just

Re: Policy change on emulators

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:23:45PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > Are the FreeDOS sources under a Fedora-acceptable license? Probably needs review. It's mostly GPLv2, but some of the included software has various other licenses. See . I'm looking with the F

Re: freecad: Need help with segfault problem on F24

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Przemek Klosowski < przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote: > On 05/03/2016 03:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > the package that's causing the segfault (Coin3) is not part of the update > but it causes a segfault in python-pivy regardless of whether you're > running the ol

pidgin, was Re: Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-05-03)

On Tue, 3 May 2016, opensou...@till.name wrote: libsilcorphan, cicku, nosnilmot 9 weeks ago Depending on: libsilc (12), status change: 2016-02-26 (9 weeks ago) pidgin (maintained by: jsynacek, itamarjp, jskarvad, mcrha, nosnilmot) libpurpl

Re: freecad: Need help with segfault problem on F24

On 05/03/2016 03:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: the package that's causing the segfault (Coin3) is not part of the update but it causes a segfault in python-pivy regardless of whether you're running the old 0.15 package or new 0.16 package so I went ahead and pushed to stable so I could update f22/

Re: freecad: Need help with segfault problem on F24

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Przemek Klosowski < przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote: > I am sligtly confused here (so what else is new :). *Bug 1153551* > seems to be > brasero's "Cannot burn files from network drive". > What am I missing? >

Re: freecad: Need help with segfault problem on F24

On 05/03/2016 02:16 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Richard Shaw > wrote: On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Ralf Corsepius mailto:rc040...@freenet.de>> wrote: How about * filing a BZ against Coin3 such that the Coin3

Re: Policy change on emulators

On Tuesday, 03 May 2016 at 21:23, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 05/03/2016 03:14 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > Does this mean that, if we strip FreeDOS out of dosemu / dosemu2, we can > > ship it and even point to a website with FreeDOS binaries? > > > > AIUI the only problem with FreeDOS is that no

Re: Policy change on emulators

On 05/03/2016 03:14 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > Does this mean that, if we strip FreeDOS out of dosemu / dosemu2, we can > ship it and even point to a website with FreeDOS binaries? > > AIUI the only problem with FreeDOS is that no one knows how to compile > it with a free software toolchain.

Re: Policy change on emulators

On May 3, 2016 12:07 PM, "Tom Callaway" wrote: > > * Emulators which depend on firmware or ROM files to function may not be > included in Fedora, unless the copyright holder(s) for the firmware/ROM > files give clear permission for the firmware/ROM files to be distributed > (either under a Fedora

Policy change on emulators

To the Fedora Community, The Fedora policy on emulators has been in place for quite some time, it is one of the first legal rules we put in place. Recently, we reconsidered that rule and have amended our position (with discussion from Red Hat Legal). Previously, the guidelines forbid the majority

Re: freecad: Need help with segfault problem on F24

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Ralf Corsepius > wrote: > >> >> How about >> * filing a BZ against Coin3 such that the Coin3 maintainer (me) gets >> informed and has a chance to reproduced the issue? >> > > Done. > > https://bugzilla.redhat

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016 11:22:30 -0500 > Adam Miller wrote: > >> Collection of RPMs is fine, the goal is just not to ship non-rpm code >> or content yet outside of Docker-ized application control scripts >> where needed/applicable. > > ok. >> >> It

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Tue, 3 May 2016 11:22:30 -0500 Adam Miller wrote: > Collection of RPMs is fine, the goal is just not to ship non-rpm code > or content yet outside of Docker-ized application control scripts > where needed/applicable. ok. > > It shouldn't but it can in the future, I was more or less replicat

Re: Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-05-03)

Hi, 2016-05-03 21:53 GMT+05:30 : > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_

Re: Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-05-03)

On Tue, 3 May 2016 16:23:59 + (UTC) opensou...@till.name wrote: > Depending on: pyliblzma (34), status change: 2016-04-26 (1 weeks ago) I went ahead and took this because so many things need it. Co-maintainers welcome. kevin pgpASnHvRF_zz.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- d

Re: What branches are under Go pressure. Did we forget about epel7?

CC'ing packaging@ On 05/03/2016 07:02 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote: Hi, Since F17, golang started to get attention in Fedora distribution. Long way was travelled since with currently activelly maintaining f22+ and el6 branches. The number of Go projects packaged in Fedora grown to more than 250 p

What branches are under Go pressure. Did we forget about epel7?

Hi, Since F17, golang started to get attention in Fedora distribution. Long way was travelled since with currently activelly maintaining f22+ and el6 branches. The number of Go projects packaged in Fedora grown to more than 250 packages. The current effort is to keep in shape all activelly ma

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2016-05-03)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-05-03)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:52:44 -0500 > Adam Miller wrote: > >> Hello all, >> We're wrapping up the first phase of the Fedora Docker Layered >> Image Build Service[0] and the time has come to start thinking about >> what we as a Project need

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Subhendu Ghosh wrote: > If we assume that image is immutable, how does one expect the applications > configuration and data to be managed? Are there additional ENV handlers > inside the container that might not be present otherwise in the RPM world? > Is there are

Re: can't login to koji - ssl error

On Ter, 2016-05-03 at 08:49 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > On Ter, 2016-05-03 at 07:34 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > > > > > > chrome is refusing to login to: > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/login > > > > > > This site can’t provide a secure connection >

Re: review swap: orocos-bfl

Hello Till, On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > I'm looking for a review swap for orocos-bfl - A framework for inference > in Dynamic Bayesian Networks. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233240 > > The package has already been informally reviewed and it should be

Fedora 24-20160503.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Failed openQA tests: 5/68 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386) ID: 15766 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15766 ID: 15773 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedo

[Bug 1332527] perl-Config-IniFiles-2.89 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332527 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- spot's perl-Config-IniFiles-2.89-1.fc25 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=759744 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. --

Re: can't login to koji - ssl error

Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2016-05-03 at 07:34 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >> chrome is refusing to login to: >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/login >> >> This site can’t provide a secure connection >> >> koji.fedoraproject.org sent an invalid response. >> Try: >> Reloading the page >

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160503.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160502.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160503.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:50.38 KiB Size of

Orphaning openlmi-storage

I'm orphaning openlmi-storage, I do not have enough time to maintain it in current Fedora 24 and Rahwide. Fell free to take it. Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20160503.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 9/58 (x86_64), 4/15 (i386) ID: 15694 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/t

review swap: orocos-bfl

Hi all, I'm looking for a review swap for orocos-bfl - A framework for inference in Dynamic Bayesian Networks. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233240 The package has already been informally reviewed and it should be fairly straight-forward to finish the review. I'm happy to do a rev

Re: can't login to koji - ssl error

The login button in koji will not work unless you configure Chrome to use your client certificate; I dunno how to do that. I read somewhere that Chrome will be dropping support for client certs, but I forget where I read it and I can't find any links to support that. On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 07:34 -

Re: can't login to koji - ssl error

On Ter, 2016-05-03 at 07:34 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > chrome is refusing to login to: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/login > > This site can’t provide a secure connection > > koji.fedoraproject.org sent an invalid response. > Try: > Reloading the page > Learn more about this problem.

Re: can't login to koji - ssl error

On 3 May 2016 12:34, "Neal Becker" wrote: > > chrome is refusing to login to: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/login > > This site can’t provide a secure connection > > koji.fedoraproject.org sent an invalid response. > Try: > Reloading the page > Learn more about this problem. > ERR_SSL_PR

can't login to koji - ssl error

chrome is refusing to login to: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/login This site can’t provide a secure connection koji.fedoraproject.org sent an invalid response. Try: Reloading the page Learn more about this problem. ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR Appears to be a deprecation in chrome 50: https://

Re: GCC 6 constexpr errors?

gcc-6.1.1-1.fc25 is no longer affected. Now could gcc-6.1.1-1.fc24 be published for F24, please? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

On 05/02/2016 09:51 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I had another conversation with them on IRC today. They knew, but when the wrong schedule was put up they thought FESCo had changed plans. There's also been some kerfluffle with the strlcat() patches that got pushed out, so we're going to have to