[Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Candidate Beta-1.4 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the cu

Fedora Rawhide-20160429.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 11/58 (x86_64), 4/15 (i386) ID: 14982 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/

Fedora 24-20160429.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 4/68 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386) ID: 15068 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15068 ID: 15080 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https:

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160429.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160427.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160429.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:8 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:38 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 16.93 MiB Size of dropped packages:51.61 MiB

Re: Fedora 24 Beta 1.2 compose check report

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 10:42 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 12:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >   > > > > > > ID: 14947 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical > > > URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/14947 > > This is a concerning one, somehow ana

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:59:40PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:52:44PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > Another point to note is that we need to determine how this should be > > handled > > in BZ components for bug reporting as well as for filing review requests. > > Ma

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:52:44PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > Another point to note is that we need to determine how this should be handled > in BZ components for bug reporting as well as for filing review requests. Maybe a "Fedora Containers" bugzilla product, so we have a different namespace fr

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 08:55:02AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > Docker Layered Image "packaging" Guidelines [1] > This current design means Dockerfiles are always secondary shims. > I think the most interesting case is for new services which are > Docker/container only at least upstream.

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:52:44PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > Something else what was brought up when I originally submitted these ideas to > FESCo[4] (aside from the fact that this should go to devel list first) was > that it is probably a good idea to establish a Container-centric Guidelines > C

orphaning freeradius-client

Hi,  I'm orphaning freeradius-client in rawhide and epel. This is a radius client library. I orphan it because it is not fun working with upstream and I switched to radcli for my projects. regards, Nikos -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists

[HEADS UP] python-paramiko 2.0.0 in rawhide

subj. Unfortunately I was not able to find if there are major changes (something bad happened with upstream that they released 10+ versions at the same time). -- -Igor Gnatenko -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproje

Fix for Bug 1135793 - Unable to boot LiveCD or boot.iso for F23 or rawhide on Acer C720P

Hello, For some time there is a *fix available * for Syslinux for Bug 1135793 - Unable to boot LiveCD or boot.iso for F23 or rawhide on Acer C720P . I can confirm that it work. The fix is

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016, at 06:52 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > Docker Layered Image "packaging" Guidelines [1] This current design means Dockerfiles are always secondary shims. I think the most interesting case is for new services which are Docker/container only at least upstream. Do we e.g. requ

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-29) [NEW TIME]

[Please note that we've moved the meeting to be an hour earlier than last week, due to daylight savings time.] Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

Hopefully we are looking at getting docker-squash/docker-scripts involved in squashing images built from the service. At least optionally if not required. docker-squash should allow you to squash everything in the Dockerfile back to the from line. from=$(awk '/^FROM/{print $2}' ~/Dockerfile

Re: Announce: OpenCV 3.1 in Rawhide

Dne 27.4.2016 v 18:59 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > FYI, The reason rawhide composes were not sending broken deps reports > to the lists or developers was a bug in fedora-pungi (The script that > calls pungi4 for us). > > I tracked down the issue and submitted a PR which Dennis merged, so > hopefully

Re: Non-responsive Maintainer: roma

Le 22/04/2016 à 09:45, Remi Collet a écrit : > Le 22/04/2016 08:21, Remi Collet a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> We have some changes needed in php-getid3 >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319676 > > I've used my provenpackager power to run the update in all the branches. > FESCO ticket o

Re: Fedora 24 Beta 1.2 compose check report

On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 12:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >  > > > > ID: 14947 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical > > URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/14947 > This is a concerning one, somehow anaconda managed to crash? The logs > include an anaconda coredump. The sam