Hello we need rebuild in rawhide :
Deps of opencv-core:
OpenImageIO
digikam
fawkes
frei0r-plugins
gmic
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
kf5-libkface
libfreenect
libkface
mrpt
nomacs
opencfu
os-autoinst
player
simarrange
simon
Deps of opencv:
php-facedetect
Deps of opencv-python:
cinnamon
python-Simpl
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2016-04-25
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! We have some F24 Changes to discuss,
and we need to plan out F24 B
On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 13:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Please be more careful with this in future. It looks like vinagre and
> weston must be rebuilt for this, I will send builds of both.
I've done this, but both required notable changes, since freerdp
changed not just the sonames but the pk
> It's got to be long long, because long is still only 32 bits on 32 bit
> systems. Sorry, I've gotten too used to working on 64 bit systems.
Ack, a real PITA with enforced 32 bits restriction on x86_64 as (short) int and
its counterpart for explicit long int as some work-around on x86.
http://
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Well, my personal preference for things like this is to send a patch
> upstream as a PR and pull that exact patch into the package with a
> comment link to the PR. But if that's substantially harder, no problem.
> Thanks for the suggestion!
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> Change the definition of VMW_BIT_MASK in lib/include/x86cpuid.h to this:
>
> #define VMW_BIT_MASK(shift) ((int)(long)(((1UL << (shift - 1)) << 1) - 1))
No, make that:
#define VMW_BIT_MASK(shift) ((int)(long)(((1ULL << (shift - 1)) << 1) - 1
On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 15:37 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > Upstream bug:
> >
> > https://github.com/vmware/open-vm-tools/issues/67
> >
> > the relevant code is here:
> >
> > https://github.com/vmware/open-vm-tools/blob/master/open-vm-to
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Upstream bug:
>
> https://github.com/vmware/open-vm-tools/issues/67
>
> the relevant code is here:
>
> https://github.com/vmware/open-vm-tools/blob/master/open-vm-tools/lib/include/x86cpuid.h#L899-L932
>
> GCC 6 does not like this:
>
> #def
> On 22 April 2016 at 08:16, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
>
> IINM the ^^^ %files section can't be commented out.
>
> [...]
Fixed.
%global addon layer-via-copy-cut
Name: gimp-%{addon}
Version:1.6
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Layer via copy/cut plug-in for GIMP
Lic
Poking around the current compose status, I noticed that aside from the
freerdp thing I just sent a mail about, another thing is blocking
Rawhide Workstation live image compose:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305108
open-vm-tools-desktop is pulled into the Workstation lives. It requ
freerdp-2.0.0-6.git.ca2d015.fc25 was submitted to Rawhide yesterday,
with no soname bump notification that I can find. It changed the soname
provides for the various freerdp libraries from:
libfreerdp-foo.so.2.0()
to:
libfreerdp-foo.so.2()
this breaks all packages which depend on these librarie
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-04-22)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-04-22/fesco.2016-04-22-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:35:21PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 08.04.2016 18:56, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> initrd is
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:35:21PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>> On 08.04.2016 18:56, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> > initrd is certainly a more difficult one. One thing we can do is work
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> How about
> * filing a BZ against Coin3 such that the Coin3 maintainer (me) gets
> informed and has a chance to reproduced the issue?
>
> * filing and proposing a patch in advance, instead of rushing out patch?
Apologies, of course you a
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 2/59 (x86_64), 16/16 (i386)
ID: 13994 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/13994
ID: 13997 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_
On 04/22/2016 02:58 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Jonathan Wakely mailto:jwak...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> Looks like Mamoru figured it out, thanks everyone for the help.
>
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323159#c34
I'm curious what the fix i
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 49/54 (x86_64), 15/15 (i386)
ID: 13925 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/13
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:35:21PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> On 08.04.2016 18:56, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > initrd is certainly a more difficult one. One thing we can do is work on
>> > making dracut builds reproducible - that way the
On 22/04/16 07:58 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Looks like Mamoru figured it out, thanks everyone for the help.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323159#c34
I'm curious what the fix is :-)
All the bugzilla says is that the
OLD: Fedora-24-20160421.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160422.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:12
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:1.67 MiB
Size of
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Looks like Mamoru figured it out, thanks everyone for the help.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323159#c34
>
> I'm curious what the fix is :-)
>
> All the bugzilla says is that the memhandler is null, which was alrea
> Looks like Mamoru figured it out, thanks everyone for the help.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323159#c34
I'm curious what the fix is :-)
All the bugzilla says is that the memhandler is null, which was already
apparent from the stacktrace. I'll have a look when the patch lan
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.42.0 next week.
There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library
libpoppler.so.*.
I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.42.0 against which you can
test your packages. You can find the build here:
http://koji.fedoraprojec
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
> On 20/04/16 15:39 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> I plan to build the latest version of yaml-cpp, 0.5.3, for rawhide soon.
>> There's no announced soversion bump but abi-compliance-checker doesn't
>> think they're compatible[1] so probably
On 22/04/16 07:36 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
On 21/04/16 08:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
Well it turns out -fsanitize=undefined made no difference in this case...
Here's the stacktrace:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/358119/46124321/
Looks like Mamoru figured it out, thanks everyone for the help.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323159#c34
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
> On 21/04/16 08:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> Well it turns out -fsanitize=undefined made no difference in this case...
>>
>> Here's the stacktrace:
>>
>> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/358119/46124321/
>>
>
> allocator=0x0 is the prob
Dne 20.4.2016 v 23:18 Miroslav Suchy napsal(a):
> We have temporary problems with ppc builders so I stopped ppc builds for
> now.
> This does not affect i386 and x86_64 queue.
> I anticipate that tomorrow I may start it again.
PPC builders works again.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior So
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160421.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160422.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.66 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00
On 21/04/16 08:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
Well it turns out -fsanitize=undefined made no difference in this case...
Here's the stacktrace:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/358119/46124321/
allocator=0x0 is the problem there, that argument must be non-null.
It comes from:
void operator d
On 20/04/16 15:39 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I plan to build the latest version of yaml-cpp, 0.5.3, for rawhide soon.
There's no announced soversion bump but abi-compliance-checker doesn't
think they're compatible[1] so probably best to play it safe and rebuild
dependencies.
# dnf repoquery --al
On 22 April 2016 at 08:16, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I just hit an issue trying to build a gimp plugins which use python.
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13757854
>
> You can take a look at the spec below so you can check the mistake:
>
> --
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
>> meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
There is one more ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1574 .
It has been opened today (Fr
Le 22/04/2016 08:21, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We have some changes needed in php-getid3
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319676
I've used my provenpackager power to run the update in all the branches.
Remi
P.S. but ownership still wanted.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
35 matches
Mail list logo
