On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
Well, after almost three hours, fedora-review came through.
I am a little confused by the beginning of the %install section, could you
please explain the syntax of the first line?
(%make_install INSTALL="install -p")
It essentially
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:20:51AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2016-04-18 at 23:54 +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > It's been a little over two hours since I started fedora-review and
> > it seems I'm hitting these two bugs:
> > * dnf repoquery --resolve is extremely slow #1279538
>
I found out gimpfx-foundry was retired a while ago since Fedora 16 so I
brought it back. It will be nice someone doing a review in exchange of
doing the same as I plan to add gimpfx-foundry as part of Design Suite
collection.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929
Thanks in advance.
ausil unset the critpath flag on the perl-AnyEvent-BDB package ()
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Seg, 2016-04-18 at 23:54 +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> It's been a little over two hours since I started fedora-review and
> it seems I'm hitting these two bugs:
> * dnf repoquery --resolve is extremely slow #1279538
I already change priority and severity of #1279538 to urgent
> * fedor
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:36:02PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> I think we have all of the releng changes lined up for Beta, though
> another week would let us get layered image build service in
> production. I do not think that pushing 24 out an extra week needs to
> delay f25 in any way shape o
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> Well, after almost three hours, fedora-review came through.
>
> I am a little confused by the beginning of the %install section, could you
> please explain the syntax of the first line?
> (%make_install INSTALL="install -p")
>
It esse
ausil unset the critpath flag on the perl-Coro package (master)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Monday, April 18, 2016 5:30:49 PM CDT Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:47:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Is it acceptable to have Beta & Final release dates for F24 as stated
> > > on [1], or we really need to slip these dates ?
> >
> > From QA's side we can at least
ausil unset the critpath flag on the perl-HTTP-Negotiate package (master)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Well, after almost three hours, fedora-review came through.
I am a little confused by the beginning of the %install section, could you
please explain the syntax of the first line?
(%make_install INSTALL="install -p")
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.or
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:47:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Is it acceptable to have Beta & Final release dates for F24 as stated
> > on [1], or we really need to slip these dates ?
> From QA's side we can at least try to make the unamended date, as I
> said.
Awesome. I'd really, really n
Hi folks! Time for a first F24 Beta blocker bug status mail. Today is
the Beta freeze date, so we need to be really focusing on getting Beta
into shape now.
tl;dr work summary
--
QA folks:
* test fix for #1325085 (ARM-y):
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9efb5
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> It's been a little over two hours since I started fedora-review and it seems
> I'm hitting these two bugs:
> * dnf repoquery --resolve is extremely slow #1279538
> * fedora-review queries too many times for same thing #1275275
>
> I'll
It's been a little over two hours since I started fedora-review and it
seems I'm hitting these two bugs:
* dnf repoquery --resolve is extremely slow #1279538
* fedora-review queries too many times for same thing #1275275
I'll try to stay up until it finishes and if that takes too long, I'll let
it
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 22:41 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 15:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Jan,
> > >
> > > Looking at the schedule[1] today I am confused by one thing,
> > > Fed
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 15:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> Looking at the schedule[1] today I am confused by one thing, Fedora policy
>> states that any slip pushes out all other milestones. which would mean Beta
>> Freeze
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 15:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Looking at the schedule[1] today I am confused by one thing, Fedora policy
> states that any slip pushes out all other milestones. which would mean Beta
> Freeze is next week not this week.
>
> Dennis
>
>
> [1] https://fe
ausil unset the critpath flag on the perl-HTTP-Negotiate package ()
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Jan,
Looking at the schedule[1] today I am confused by one thing, Fedora policy
states that any slip pushes out all other milestones. which would mean Beta
Freeze is next week not this week.
Dennis
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule
signature.asc
Description: This is
I'm trying to build a package in COPR, the source RPM is rather large
(500MB), but it always worked fine also with bigger source files. I
supposed I had a bad URL an uploaded the SRPM twice, but the result is the
same.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/copr/dist_git/dist_git_im
FYI, tracking bug:
Tracking bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310542
Maybe a good idea for any new bugs filed to set that bug number in the
blocks field.
Chris
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.
Tomorrow (Tuesday 2016-04-19) will be Fedora Media Writer Test Day[1]!
As part of this planned Change[2] for Fedora 24, the Fedora graphical
USB writing tool - formerly called "Live USB Creator", and still
technically called that in terms of source repos and filenames, but in
the process of being
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:20:15 +0100
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello, sometime ago I took libcdaudio , because though that was
> important to keep it, nowadays almost all packages that need cdaudio,
> use libcdio and libcdio-paranoia [1], so I think the correct is remove
> libcdaudio from critpath , ho
mån 2016-04-18 klockan 09:41 -0400 skrev Irina Boverman:
> Why I am getting these messages?
> Latest version in rawhide is 0.5-3, and there are no broken
> dependencies...
> Regards, Irina.
> - Forwarded Message -
> From: build...@fedoraproject.org
> To: qpid-dispatch-ow...@fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307195
--- Comment #18 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ppisar's perl-IPC-Cmd-0.94-3.fc25 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=755529
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedo
I am very sorry.
Today Lubos K. accidentally submitted 10k packages to Copr. I wanted to run one
simple SQL query to set all those builds
as failed. Unfortunately I made big mistake - I forgot to add one column to
'where' condition. As result of this error
*all* builds were marked as failed. All
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Irina Boverman
> wrote:
>
>>
>> qpid-dispatch has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
>> On x86_64:
>> qpid-dispatch-router-0.5-2.fc24.x86_64 requires
>> libqpid-proton.so.3()(64bit)
>> On i386:
The F24 packages were updated as well, latest is qpid-dispatch-0.5-3.fc24 and
qpid-proton-0.12.1-1.fc24.
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Ciesla"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:49:27 AM
Subject: Re: Broken dependencies: qpid-dispatch
On
Planned Outage: koji database server - 2016-04-18 14:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2016-04-18 14:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-04-18 1
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Irina Boverman wrote:
> Why I am getting these messages?
> Latest version in rawhide is 0.5-3, and there are no broken dependencies...
> Regards, Irina.
> - Forwarded Message -
> From: build...@fedoraproject.org
> To: qpid-dispatch-ow...@fedoraproject.org
From 4f122176b6c2370f0e23e6727e018aa3e82ae88c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:26:04 +0200
Subject: Provide maybe_command independently
---
...Utils-MM-methods-as-standalone-ExtUtils-M.patch | 110 +
perl-ExtUtils-Mak
Why I am getting these messages?
Latest version in rawhide is 0.5-3, and there are no broken dependencies...
Regards, Irina.
- Forwarded Message -
From: build...@fedoraproject.org
To: qpid-dispatch-ow...@fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:11:59 AM
Subject: Broken dependencies:
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
60 packages were orphaned
-
bandwidthd [master, el6, epel7, el5] was orphaned by ondrejj
Tracks network usage and builds html and graphs
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
Hi,
The current maintainer and major contributor to iptrag-ng, Nikola
Pajkovsky , no longer has the time to devote to
this project. I have been working with him to transition the work to me.
Phil Cameron
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 9/54 (x86_64), 15/15 (i386)
ID: 13327 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedora
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160417.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160418.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 30
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 117.65 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Alexander,
It should be fine now. I forgot to move it to the correct location. Silly me.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> Hi Neal,
>
> The link to the source rpm in rhbz seems broken.
> If nobody else comes forward by tonight, I'll pick up the review.
>
> Best Regar
Jonathan Underwood schrieb am Mo., 18. Apr.
2016 um 12:04 Uhr:
> On 18 April 2016 at 08:06, Thomas Spura wrote:
> > Any help on reviewing new packages for ipython/jupyter and
> (co-)maintaining
> > the ipython stack is welcome. Are there any volunteers? :)
>
>
> Am happy to help review packages,
On 18 April 2016 at 08:06, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Any help on reviewing new packages for ipython/jupyter and (co-)maintaining
> the ipython stack is welcome. Are there any volunteers? :)
Am happy to help review packages, and will have a window of time in
the coming two weeks where I'll have more
On Thursday, 14 April 2016 at 23:03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 April 2016 at 14:50, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> [...]
> > > I'm going to update elpa to 2015.11 this week, which includes a soname
> > > bump and an API change. This change affects the following packages:
> >
Rex Dieter wrote:
% yum includes arch/release subdirs under /var/cache/yum, the important part
% is the "release" part. So, it is theoretically easy to identify which parts
% are worth keeping and which ones are not (ie, does the release/ subdir match
% the current release or not). ie,
% $ ls
Hi Neal,
The link to the source rpm in rhbz seems broken.
If nobody else comes forward by tonight, I'll pick up the review.
Best Regards
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Philippe Makowski schrieb am So., 17. Apr. 2016
um 19:29 Uhr:
> Hi,
>
> just in case, I started to package ipython 4 and Jupyter in Mageia..
> my progress is there https://wiki.mageia.org/en/User:Philippem
>
> may be it could help for Fedora.
>
Thank you for your effort. It is of help to see whi
44 matches
Mail list logo
