On 1. 4. 2016 at 12:51:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run
> into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to
> correctly handle these new dependencies.
>
> At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask mainta
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 14:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> > That seems to be a bit over-dramatic. gnome-initial-setup works fine.
>> > The online accounts step will be affect
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 18:07:50 -0500
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
>
> KF> At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintainers to not use
> KF> rich boolean Requires/Recommends for the time being until tooling
> KF> can catch up and allow us to push updates
> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
KF> At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintainers to not use
KF> rich boolean Requires/Recommends for the time being until tooling
KF> can catch up and allow us to push updates with them.
Could someone look over the language in
https://fedoraproject.org
Thanks, but not working(
output:
/
[ilgrad@x230 rubygem-connection-pool]$ fedpkg retire "Renamed to bar"
rm '.gitignore'
rm 'rubygem-connection_pool.spec'
rm 'sources'
[master ed1] Renamed to bar
4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 89 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 .gitignor
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:32 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> OK, so I think Michael is kind of making my point for me:
>
> If we have something called @standard whose purpose is essentially to
> be a small
> set of things we expect everyone to need... having one of our top-
> tier
> deliverables
I recently got a rash of bug report that FreeCAD on f24 was segfaulting.
After looking at a few things I noticed that the f24 builds seem to be
missing all library based dependencies.
Has this happened to anyone else?
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://list
On 04/04/2016 04:28 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:20 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> All that said, for F24 I think @standard is probably the right place
>> for
>> systemd-udev. But I think comps needs to be completely rethought in
>> F25+.
>
> Keep in mind that Fedora
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:20 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> All that said, for F24 I think @standard is probably the right place
> for
> systemd-udev. But I think comps needs to be completely rethought in
> F25+.
Keep in mind that Fedora Workstation does NOT include @standard as it
brings in som
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:23:56 -0500
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > It does.
> >
> > Also, I haven't seen any of the breakage in webkit mentioned in this
> > thread here with a skylake laptop.
>
> The bug only occurs in accelerated composi
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:20:34PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> (Also, going forward I'd love to see us build comps in a more sane manner than
> by editing an XML file; this simply *screams* for having a decent web UI to
> manage it, tied into pkgdb so when a package is retired it also disappe
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It does.
>
> Also, I haven't seen any of the breakage in webkit mentioned in this
> thread here with a skylake laptop.
The bug only occurs in accelerated compositing (OpenGL) mode, which is
currently only used when necessary to support a p
On 04/04/2016 03:30 PM, Ilia Gradina wrote:
> Hi all, in Fedora have two packages:
> 1. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection-pool
> and
> 2. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection_pool How delete
> my
> file in Fedora:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/pack
On 04/04/2016 12:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to move two systemd subpackages from the the @core group,
> but I don't know where to move them to.
>
> systemd-udev must be installed on "real hardware", so it must be
> part of Workstation, Server, Cloud, and any spin
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:33:51 -0400
Eric Griffith wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 14:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > That seems to be a bit over-dramatic. gnome-initial-setup works
> > > fine. The online accounts step will b
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 14:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > That seems to be a bit over-dramatic. gnome-initial-setup works fine.
> > The online accounts step will be affected, but that's about it.
>
> And the breakage will be limited t
Hi all, in Fedora have two packages:
1. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection-pool
and
2. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection_pool How
delete my file in Fedora:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection-pool
Thanks and sorry for my mista
On 03/31/2016 09:28 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I've just submitted
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06
This update does two things:
- Updates python to version 2.7.11
- Splits out the python macros into separate packages
It would be helpful if packagers would try bui
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 14:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> That seems to be a bit over-dramatic. gnome-initial-setup works fine.
> The online accounts step will be affected, but that's about it.
Yes, only the webview portions of g-i-s would be affected, of course
(gnome-online-accounts page, and
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Martin Ueding wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Am 03.04.2016 um 21:42 schrieb Chris Murphy:
>> So reboot a few times and check 'efibootmgr -v' to see if
>> you start getting accumulating boot entries again or not.
>
> Sadly, they keep accumulating. After the first boot I ha
On Sat, 2016-04-02 at 09:17 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >
> > So if there are issues with WebKit they should be fixed. "It can't
> > work lets go back to DRI2" isn't really an option in the long run
> It would be great if somebody would fix this. I just want to give a
> heads-up that we are
Hi,
I'd like to move two systemd subpackages from the the @core group,
but I don't know where to move them to.
systemd-udev must be installed on "real hardware", so it must be
part of Workstation, Server, Cloud, and any spin. It should not be
installed in containers and chroots, e.g. mock.
Is @st
Hi Chris,
Am 03.04.2016 um 21:42 schrieb Chris Murphy:
> You can delete Boot0019 through Boot0129. Use either 'efibootmgr -b
> -B'
Funny enough, the first delete failed due to lack of memory! So there
was some hard limit reached.
> or rm from efivars/ but I wouldn't try deleting throug
On 04/03/2016 04:11 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 23:14:14 +0200
drago01 wrote:
No. This line does not tell you much.
Easy way to check for DRi3 is to run "glxinfo|grep buffer_age" ... if
you have to lines in that output you'd hav
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Images in this compose but not 24-20160403.n.0:
Scientific_kde live x86_64
Robotics live i386
Cinnamon live i386
Astronomy_kde live x86_64
Robotics live x86_64
Scientific_kde live i386
Astronomy_kde liv
I have orphaned the following branches. I don't have any machines that run
EPEL, and prefer to test things out before I push. These branches are also
supported and
maintained directly by Sphinx.
Fedora EPEL 7 Orphaned
Fedora EPEL 6 Orphaned
Fedora EPEL 5 Orphaned
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
OLD: Fedora-24-20160403.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160404.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 28
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.18 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 314.82 MiB
Size of
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
9 packages were orphaned
RunSnakeRun [f23, f22, master, f24] was orphaned by kevin
GUI Viewer for Python profiling runs
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package
On 2016-04-04 07:49, Tom Hughes wrote:
I have been trying to resolve the FTBFS status of geos and related
issued in F24/Rawhide for two months now, without any success as the
maintainer, devrim, is not responding in any meaningful way. The
original bug report is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
I have been trying to resolve the FTBFS status of geos and related
issued in F24/Rawhide for two months now, without any success as the
maintainer, devrim, is not responding in any meaningful way. The
original bug report is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305276
Having failed
On 04/03/2016 10:03 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:46:12PM -0400, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>>
>> I would be glad to put this up for review and maintain the package
>> assuming there is not someone else who
On 29.03.2016 19:22, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>>> Yes. This makes it work. Thanks a lot.
>
>> Then it was probably broken by this update:
>
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606ca05253
>
> The "LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1" workaround fixed it for me a
616ad3c594d1c1a8877448a2d29368ed Test2-0.38.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test2/Test2-0.38.tar.gz/md5/616ad3c594d1c1a8877448a2d29368ed/Test2-0.38.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing l
On 04/04/16 08:46, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:00:14PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/01/2016 03:46 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:14:43PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
Requires: (perl-generators i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323371
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Archive-Zip-1.57-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fbc1fa562b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323371
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
From bd7dadc97e93203b48372d6db680c34da58d5a0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 09:34:30 +0200
Subject: 1.57 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Archive-Zip.spec | 9 ++---
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:00:14PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 04/01/2016 03:46 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:14:43PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >>On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> >>>Requires: (perl-generators if perl-libs)
> >>>
> >>That's
From 99e4ed305abdf7f6e8d5d49695f4c2ed1d45ba3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 09:34:30 +0200
Subject: 1.57 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Archive-Zip.spec | 9 ++---
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(
d4ca4b60bcd3bc8c3aa67545163d2128 Archive-Zip-1.57.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Archive-Zip/Archive-Zip-1.57.tar.gz/md5/d4ca4b60bcd3bc8c3aa67545163d2128/Archive-Zip-1.57.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-dev
40 matches
Mail list logo
