Re: package review request

hi can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 ? thanks in advance .g Il 27/03/2016 05:58, Mukundan Ragavan ha scritto: Hello all, I have a compat package that I would like to get reviewed. Here is the link to the review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b

package review request

Hello all, I have a compat package that I would like to get reviewed. Here is the link to the review - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440 This is a compat package for SuperLU which I updated to v5.1 today. Some of the packages that depend on SuperLU has version specific requ

ddclient orphaned

Somehow, somewhen, I wound up as the main contact for the 'ddclient' package though I never intended to and know nothing at all about it. I've noticed this a couple of times before and I guess I looked up why but I forgot again and I'm sick of it, I don't want this package and I don't want its bugs

[Test-Announce] 2016-03-28 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 24 Blocker Review

# F24 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-03-28 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have a few proposed blockers to review, so let's take a look at them. There are 4 proposed Beta blockers, 5 proposed Final blockers, and 2 accepted Beta blockers.

[Test-Announce] 2016-03-28 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2016-03-28 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again tomorrow! We haven't met for a few weeks and F24 Alpha is signed off now, so

Test Fails the cloned repo - Fedora Hubs

I tested the cloned Fedora hubs repo before add changes.But it failed and shows an error like the following. Any help? :) http://titansmora.org/Fedora/uploads/Screenshot%20from%202016-03-26%2009-35-59.png -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lis

Re: Should breathe package be called python-breathe?

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Jonathan Underwood < jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 March 2016 at 05:14, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 21:23 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313796 > >> This request to include a Pyth

pystatgrab: license change GPLv2+ -> LGPLv2+

Heads up that v0.6 coming to Rawhide has a license change from GPLv2+ to LGPLv2+. See https://github.com/i-scream/pystatgrab/commit/c88af8cd35712e4fec035637f4c8314b27eec3d4 Regards, --Tim Orling (Intel) FAS: ttorling irc: moto-timo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists

Re: Looking for co-maintainer of git

Feel Free to add my name to willing co-maintainers On 03/26/2016 11:58 AM, Divya HariOm wrote: > Hi Petr, > > I use git in my day to day life and I also would really like to help > you co-maintain it. > > > Thank you, > Divya > > On 26 March 2016 at 11:40, Björn Esser

Re: Looking for co-maintainer of git

Thank You guys. I have already enough emails :-) On 26.3.2016 18:11, Peter Borsa wrote: > Hi, > > Yeah, I use it everyday so I would like to help as co-maintainer. > > > Divya HariOm > ezt írta (időpont: 2016. márc. 26., > Szo 16:58): > > Hi Petr, >

Re: Looking for co-maintainer of git

Hi, Yeah, I use it everyday so I would like to help as co-maintainer. Divya HariOm ezt írta (időpont: 2016. márc. 26., Szo 16:58): > Hi Petr, > > I use git in my day to day life and I also would really like to help you > co-maintain it. > > > Thank you, > Divya > > On 26 March 2016 at 11:40, Bj

soname bump for SuperLU

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello all, I will be updating SuperLU to the latest upstream release - version 5.1.1. This results in the libsuperlu soname version to be bumped from 4.3 to 5.1. There are only two packages that depend on superlu - armadillo and freefem++. I will

Re: Status of XRDP in F23+

On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 18:30 +, Christopher wrote: >  > (FWIW, I couldn't get it to work in CentOS 7, either, though it works > fine in CentOS 6). > We are using it successfully in centos 7 at work. The one caveat is I had to pull in remmina from Rawhide to have a usable client. F22 remmina f

Re: Looking for co-maintainer of git

Hi Petr, I use git in my day to day life and I also would really like to help you co-maintain it. Thank you, Divya On 26 March 2016 at 11:40, Björn Esser wrote: > Hey Petr! > > I can help you co-maintaining git. Feel free to add me in pkgdb. > > Cheers > Björn > > > > Am 26.03.2016 um 16:3

Re: Looking for co-maintainer of git

Hey Petr! I can help you co-maintaining git. Feel free to add me in pkgdb. Cheers Björn Am 26.03.2016 um 16:38 schrieb Petr Stodulka: Hi folks, I would like some help with maintainance of git package mainly - I have not so much time due to combination of school & work and I plan add anot

Looking for co-maintainer of git

Hi folks, I would like some help with maintainance of git package mainly - I have not so much time due to combination of school & work and I plan add another package into Fedora soon, so some another comaintainer will be welcomed. Regards, Petr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital sign

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

> rpms/hg-git -- Mercurial Plugin for Communicating with Git Servers ( > master f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) After discussion with cicku I am going to take this one, at least temporarily. Petr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http:

Packages installing files to /etc/tmpfiles.d

The following packages in current rawhide install files to /etc/tmpfiles.d. They should most likely be fixed to install those files to /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d instead. $ dnf -q repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --qf=%{NAME} "/etc/tmpfiles.d/*" | sort -u 389-dsgw amplab-tachyon anyterm Bac

Tecnoballz

Hi all, I am Tecnoballz maintainer. Currently Tecnoballz is failing to build in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308179 There is a new upstream version (0.93.1) and it builds without problems. I also added Debian/upstream patches. In order to allow a shared scoreboard fi

Re: [HEADS-UP] so-name-bump JSONCPP in rawhide

Hey folks! So… The rebuilds have finished without any bigger problems (orthanc was a bit tricky, but that was not related to jsoncpp). We have `jsoncpp-1.7.2-1.fc25` in rawhide, now. Since all rebuilds were successful, the so-name-bump to 1 is a nice enhancement (no removed symbols) and th