Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Cloud raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Could not find previous release. No comparison possible.
Failed openQA tests: 17 of 76
ID: 9068Test: i386 Server-boot-iso default_install
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/9068
A little after scheduled [1], Fedora 24 Alpha Candidate 1 (Alpha 1.1)
is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the
validation testing!
I had to use a nasty hack to generate the event, but hopefully you
can't tell from the outside! Please excuse any kinks in the process
while we fi
We are discussing in Fedora Infrastructure about level of SLA of some
services. And mainly because of Copr. There are some other services e.g.
Jenkins, Taiga. However Copr is probably most popular. Copr service was
from begging meant as somehow beta version and did not pass all the
requirements Fed
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:24:04PM -0500, langdon wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Fedora_Modularization,_Prototype_Phase
So, at the Council meeting today, we unanimously approved this as a
Fedora Objective. Logs here:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-03-14/
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:07:11PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:27:42 +0100
> Phil Sutter wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:11:50PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > On 2016-03-14, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the explanation, although I honestly don't see how
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-Hardware-Verilog-Parser to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:27:42 +0100
Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:11:50PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On 2016-03-14, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > Thanks for the explanation, although I honestly don't see how
> > > that could come to unison with the kernel updates applied to
> > >
On 14 March 2016 at 16:09, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Saturday, March 12, 2016 2:32:38 PM CDT Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> > Package: eclipse-launchbar-1.0.1-1.gitedd5f69.fc25
> > Old package: eclipse-launchbar-1.0.2-0.1.git93cdb07.fc25
> > Summary: Eclipse Launchbar plug-in
> > RPMs
On Saturday, March 12, 2016 2:32:38 PM CDT Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> Package: eclipse-launchbar-1.0.1-1.gitedd5f69.fc25
> Old package: eclipse-launchbar-1.0.2-0.1.git93cdb07.fc25
> Summary: Eclipse Launchbar plug-in
> RPMs: eclipse-launchbar
> Size: 181382 bytes
> Si
On Monday, March 14, 2016 2:45:58 PM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 14.3.2016 v 12:26 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 12.3.2016 v 15:32 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
> >>> = SUMMARY =
> >>> Added packages: 11
> >>> Dropped p
On Monday, March 14, 2016 11:01:49 AM CDT Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
> Package: clipper-2.1-1.20150701.fc25
> Old package: clipper-2.1-28.20140911.fc23
> Summary: Clipper C++ crystallographic library
> RPMs: clipper clipper-devel
> Size:
Missing expected images:
Cloud raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Cloud raw-xz x86_64
No images in this compose but not 24-20160313.n.1
No images in 24-20160313.n.1 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 19 of 78
ID: 8988Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso default_install
URL: https://openqa.fedo
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:11:50PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2016-03-14, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Thanks for the explanation, although I honestly don't see how that could
> > come to unison with the kernel updates applied to stable versions. Any
> > new version could break existing functionality
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I don't understand what happened here.
>
> Did aarch64 only recently update to gcc 6.0?
> What's the right way to fix this? Just do a rebuild for all arches?
Ignore it, it was a bug in a compose script, those email aren't meant
to go out for
On 2016-03-14, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation, although I honestly don't see how that could
> come to unison with the kernel updates applied to stable versions. Any
> new version could break existing functionality (although not intended),
> so that "should" seems to be key.
Yes.
On 03/14/2016 08:57 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 03/14/2016 04:24 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> On 03/14/2016 10:34 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>> Dne 14.3.2016 v 02:06 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
DNF can totally process conditional dependencies as libsolv in Fedora
is compiled with support
On 03/14/2016 04:24 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 03/14/2016 10:34 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> Dne 14.3.2016 v 02:06 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
>>> DNF can totally process conditional dependencies as libsolv in Fedora
>>> is compiled with support for it. I'm not sure why Koschei isn't
>>> handling i
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:03:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:36:38PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:21:33PM +, James Hogarth wrote:
> > > On 14 March 2016 at 11:47, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > So f
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 04:12 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > # F24 Blocker Review meeting
> > # Date: 2016-03-14
> > # Time: 17:00 UTC
> Actually, I believe it should be 16:00 UTC, because North America
> just moved to summer time, and we're usually tied to NA local time
> for our meetings. So i
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 13:36 +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> While this certainly makes sense, I start to wonder what Fedora's
> understanding of 'stability' really is if it seems to not cover the
> packages (including kernel) it distributes. Does it cover only
> anything
> else, like e.g. installation
I don't understand what happened here.
Did aarch64 only recently update to gcc 6.0?
What's the right way to fix this? Just do a rebuild for all arches?
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:04 AM
Subject: Broken dependencies: odb
To: odb-ow...@fedoraproject.o
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:36:38PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:21:33PM +, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 14 March 2016 at 11:47, Phil Sutter wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > So far my idea of maintaining Fedora's iproute package was to do full
> > > version updates onl
Dne 14.3.2016 v 12:26 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Dne 12.3.2016 v 15:32 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
>>> = SUMMARY =
>>> Added packages: 11
>>> Dropped packages:0
>>> Upgraded packages: 164
>>> Downgraded packages:
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 24
Alpha.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, March 17, 2016 17:00 UTC.
Please check the [FedoCal] link for your time zone.
Before each public release Develop
OLD: Fedora-24-20160313.n.1
NEW: Fedora-24-20160314.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B
Size of downgraded
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for the Fedora 24 Alpha
Release Readiness Meeting meeting.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, March 17, 2016 19:00 UTC.
Please check the [FedoCal] link for your time zone.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Alpha
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:21:33PM +, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 14 March 2016 at 11:47, Phil Sutter wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > So far my idea of maintaining Fedora's iproute package was to do full
> > version updates only in Rawhide and backport patches selectively to
> > stable versions on beh
On 14 March 2016 at 11:47, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So far my idea of maintaining Fedora's iproute package was to do full
> version updates only in Rawhide and backport patches selectively to
> stable versions on behalf of bug reports.
>
> But since stable versions indeed receive full kernel
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> koschei is now reporting:
>>
>> Dependency problems nothing provides (sni-qt(x86-64) if
>> plasma-workspace) needed by qt-x11-1:4.8.7-11.fc25.x86_64
> ...
>> Is this a dnf/koschei issue or with the above conditional requires?
>
> I assume koschei
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Cloud raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160313.n.1:
Lxde live x86_64
Design_suite live i386
Workstation live i386
Design_suite live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Hi,
So far my idea of maintaining Fedora's iproute package was to do full
version updates only in Rawhide and backport patches selectively to
stable versions on behalf of bug reports.
But since stable versions indeed receive full kernel updates (not just
backported patches), there is an understan
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 12.3.2016 v 15:32 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
>> = SUMMARY =
>> Added packages: 11
>> Dropped packages:0
>> Upgraded packages: 164
>> Downgraded packages: 2
>>
>
>
> Interesting, is this already 4th downgraded p
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160313.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160314.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 11
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 219.92 MiB
Size
Dne 12.3.2016 v 15:32 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
> = SUMMARY =
> Added packages: 11
> Dropped packages:0
> Upgraded packages: 164
> Downgraded packages: 2
>
Interesting, is this already 4th downgraded package this week?
Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
On 03/14/2016 10:34 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 14.3.2016 v 02:06 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
>> DNF can totally process conditional dependencies as libsolv in Fedora
>> is compiled with support for it. I'm not sure why Koschei isn't
>> handling it well.
>
> Maybe because Koschei builds using mock (
On 03/13/2016 04:08 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> koschei is now reporting:
>
> Dependency problems nothing provides (sni-qt(x86-64) if
> plasma-workspace) needed by qt-x11-1:4.8.7-11.fc25.x86_64
>
[...]
>
> Is this a dnf/koschei issue or with the above conditional requires? Are
> these even
Dne 14.3.2016 v 02:06 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> DNF can totally process conditional dependencies as libsolv in Fedora
> is compiled with support for it. I'm not sure why Koschei isn't
> handling it well.
Maybe because Koschei builds using mock (?) and mock by default still use yum
(but rawhide) and
> # F24 Blocker Review meeting
> # Date: 2016-03-14
> # Time: 17:00 UTC
Actually, I believe it should be 16:00 UTC, because North America just moved to
summer time, and we're usually tied to NA local time for our meetings. So if
anyone's reading this, be there an hour earlier, just to be sure, a
Hi all,
It's GNOME 3.19.92 release this week. As we are deep in the Alpha freeze
in Fedora, this will stay in updates-testing for a while until the
freeze is lifted and floodgates open a again.
We have koji side tag to collect all the builds before submitting them
to Bodhi. If you are helping wit
40 matches
Mail list logo
