Why not retire it directly and properly? Just an idea ;-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From b12dfde16611e3d73016457a0adc06302864f7ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:49:38 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.001000
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Moo.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2016-03-03 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2016-03-03 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2016-03-03 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2016-03-03 17
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:49:10 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> If you observe the build logs carefully, there were some segfaults for
> example:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13171578
>
> This particular one is PPC, so it might be platform specific issue,
> who knows
Ye
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 21:13:23 +0100
josef radinger wrote:
> i just stumbled over the following error while using bodhi on f22:
...snip...
> there seem to be several tickets open for that, but no visible
> progress. tickets in trac and bugzilla:
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:05:18 -0300
Reartes Guillermo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The mail "[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests" is showing me
> these items since some time ago.
>
> These seems to have the NEEDINFO flag, but they are CLOSED (and
> several releases ago).
>
> Should the closure of
Hi there,
I just pushed openssh-7.2 update [1] into Fedora 23 testing. There are
no incompatible changes except these:
* the minimum modulus size supported for diffie-hellman-group-exchange
was increased to 2048 bits,
* several legacy cryptographic algorithms and MD5-based and truncated
FYI, perl-Text-SimpleTable's license was corrected from `the
same as Perl' to `Artistic 2.0'.
P
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/02/2016 06:50 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
I'd like to ask you for advice. I've packaged an application which can
use external CLI tools (not available in Fedora for various non-legal
reasons). Shall I remove support for these tools or better keep it?
The answer is "it depends".
Hello All!
I'd like to ask you for advice. I've packaged an application which can
use external CLI tools (not available in Fedora for various non-legal
reasons). Shall I remove support for these tools or better keep it?
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
nodm is now orphaned with all branches.
Please feel free to take this package and/or poke upstream about valid sources.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
11 matches
Mail list logo