Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

I had just installed vulkan on my Alienware m14x, and it seemed to erase my previous light settings as well as making fedora unbootable. I'm currently looking into how to get around it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fed

Re: GCC6: failure with -isystem /usr/include

On 16 February 2016 at 13:08, Rex Dieter wrote: > So, 2 options (not mutually exclusive): > > * fix configure to not add /usr/include to ac_incpath > * fix src/src.pri.in to comment-out (or remove) the line starting with > INCLUDEPATH += (I don't think it's needed) > Yes, I could use those to work

GPG2 as default /usr/bin/gpg

I just ran into this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309175 It's not a huge deal (and there are several workarounds, for git and for other tools which default ot using 'gpg'), but it highlights the mismatch between the default /usr/bin/gpg running gpg1, when other tools, like gpg-agen

Re: Fwd: Use suid_dumpable=2 for development releases

On 02/16/2016 03:23 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Feb 15, 2016 10:36 PM, "Jakub Filak" > wrote: > > It looks like that there are no opponents of this change but several supporters > and few of them even want to have suid_dumpable=2 in all releases. > > I was thin

Re: requesting help on fixing gcc-6 FTBFS

Hi! > 1/ Labplot - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307279 > > I think the issue is here - > > /builddir/build/BUILD/labplot-kf5-2.1.0/src/backend/worksheet/TextLabel. > cpp:538:38: > error: call of overloaded 'abs(qreal)' is ambiguous >if (abs(point.x()-position.point.x())>20 &&

requesting help on fixing gcc-6 FTBFS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi folks, After the recent mass builds, I have a few packages that fail to build from source. I have tried digging through the build logs to see if I can fix them. Unfortunately, my knowledge of C/C++ is far too basic to handle these issues. If f

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

- Original Message - > From: "Marcin Juszkiewicz" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, 17 February, 2016 8:59:51 AM > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan > > W dniu 16.02.2016 o 19:48, Adam Jackson pisze: > > > Currently the repository includes the drive

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

W dniu 16.02.2016 o 19:48, Adam Jackson pisze: > Currently the repository includes the driver loader, as well as Intel's > open source drivers for gen8+ (Broadwell, Cherryview, Skylake, Broxton > and Kabylake) GPUs. The Intel drivers also have incomplete support for > Ivybridge, Haswell, and Baytr

How do avoid "hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/debug" from rpmlint

Hi, In cross-gcc, the specfile needs to do its own debuginfo manipulation because it has binary files that must not be stripped inside the package - and preferably must not even be looked at by the manipulation tools because they are likely to be for a completely different target to the system too

rpmlint vs zero-length files

Hi, How do I prevent rpmlint from objecting to some specific zero-length files? I'm building a bunch of cross-compilers, and the installation includes some zero-length files that appear to have to be there, but are zero-length (and in some cases look like they have to be empty). gcc-h8300-linux-

Re: Fedora AMI build process

Many thanks I'll take a look Regards, Jon On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 17:49 Kushal Das wrote: > On 16/02/16, Jon Kent wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been trying to see how we build Fedora AMIs but am starting having > not > > luck with finding documents on the buiild process. If someone could throw > > m

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > $ vkcube > 1 physical devices > anv_device.c:405: FINISHME: Get correct values for VkPhysicalDeviceLimits > vendor id 8086, device name Intel(R) HD Graphics 520 (Skylake GT2) > vulkan: No DRI3 support > Vulkan not supported on given X w

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > $ sudo dnf copr enable ajax/vulkan > $ sudo dnf install vulkan anvil vkcube > $ vulkaninfo vulkaninfo seems to work: [...] VkPhysicalDeviceProperties: === apiVersion = 4194306 driverVersion = 1

[ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

I'm pleased to announce support for Vulkan for Fedora! == What is Vulkan? == Vulkan is a new generation graphics and compute API that provides high- efficiency, cross-platform access to modern GPUs. Or: Vulkan is to OpenGL as Wayland is to X11. It does many of the same things, but - with the ben

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora

On 02/10/2016 09:06 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Hmmm. I'm not sure this is true -- or if it is, we might need something > else. Marketing still uses the changes as a primary communication > channel for this kind of thing. The Changes Policy page says "Public > announcement of a new self contained c

Re: GCC6: failure with -isystem /usr/include

Rex Dieter wrote: > Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > >> On 14 February 2016 at 18:42, Rex Dieter wrote: > >>> what package is affected here? >>> >>> I have a suspicion that QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS is being misused in this >>> context. >> >> The new version of qjackctl, which now depends on qt5. We cannot d

Re: Self Introduction: Tomas Orsava

Tomas Orsava píše v Út 16. 02. 2016 v 15:35 +: > Hi, I'm a new Red Hatter working in python-maintenance. > > I have submitted my first review-request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com > /show_bug.cgi?id=1308956 > It is the last missing dependency for a keyboard-driven, vim-like > browser called qut

Re: GCC6: failure with -isystem /usr/include

Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On 15 February 2016 at 01:46, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> >> The new version of qjackctl, which now depends on qt5. We cannot do >> the update without fixing this. As far as I can tell, the qjackctl >> does not use the QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS directly. The offending flags >> come

Re: GCC6: failure with -isystem /usr/include

Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On 14 February 2016 at 18:42, Rex Dieter wrote: >> what package is affected here? >> >> I have a suspicion that QMAKE_DEFAULT_INCDIRS is being misused in this >> context. > > The new version of qjackctl, which now depends on qt5. We cannot do > the update without fixing th

Re: Fedora AMI build process

On 16/02/16, Jon Kent wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to see how we build Fedora AMIs but am starting having not > luck with finding documents on the buiild process. If someone could throw > me a link it would be much appreciated. > The first step is about creating raw images from the kickstar

Re: Blender: New error with min/max function not in scope

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 16/02/16 16:31 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> On 16/02/16 10:13 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >>> This seems like a pretty basic error in something that has worked fine >>> for >>> a very long time. Is there anything in the GCC 6 u

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20160216 compose check report

On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 17:05 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Workstation live x86_64 > Minimal disk raw armhfp > Workstation live i386 > Kde disk raw armhfp > Kde live i386 > Kde live x86_64 > > Failed openQA tests: 23 of 57 New breakage today: some dep problem

Fedora Rawhide 20160216 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live x86_64 Minimal disk raw armhfp Workstation live i386 Kde disk raw armhfp Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160215: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud disk qcow i386 Images in Rawhide 20160215 but not this: Design_suite live

Re: Blender: New error with min/max function not in scope

On 16/02/16 16:31 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 16/02/16 10:13 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: This seems like a pretty basic error in something that has worked fine for a very long time. Is there anything in the GCC 6 update that would cause this? This no longer compiles with GCC 6: #define ma

Re: Blender: New error with min/max function not in scope

On 16/02/16 10:13 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: This seems like a pretty basic error in something that has worked fine for a very long time. Is there anything in the GCC 6 update that would cause this? This no longer compiles with GCC 6: #define max(a, b) (a > b ? a : b) #include int i = max(0,1

Blender: New error with min/max function not in scope

I was performing a rebuild of Blender after fixing a FTBFS error with openCOLLADA and ran into an interesting error: [ 78%] Building CXX object source/blender/imbuf/intern/dds/CMakeFiles/bf_imbuf_dds.dir/DirectDrawSurface.cpp.o cd /builddir/build/BUILD/blender-2.76/cmake-make/source/blender/imbuf/

perl-MongoDB license change

perl-MongoDB-1.2.2-1.fc24 changed license from (ASL 2.0 and BSD and ISC and MIT) to (ASL 2.0 and (GPL+ or Artistic)). -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora AMI build process

That's fine, understandable. Must admit I thought I was subscribed, but will check. Jon On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:28 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 02:41:18PM +, Jon Kent wrote: > > Thanks for the info. I tried mailing the SIG but it got stuck in an > > approval queue never t

Self Introduction: Tomas Orsava

Hi, I'm a new Red Hatter working in python-maintenance. I have submitted my first review-request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308956 It is the last missing dependency for a keyboard-driven, vim-like browser called qutebrowser, which I hope to package next: http://www.qutebrowser

Re: Fedora AMI build process

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 02:41:18PM +, Jon Kent wrote: > Thanks for the info. I tried mailing the SIG but it got stuck in an > approval queue never to be seen again. The Fedora mailing lists get a huge amount of spam. Like, a mind-blowing amount. Therefore, you need to be subscribed in order t

Re: GCC 6 and polymake

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I'll take a look. Thank you Jonathan. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora AMI build process

Thanks for the info. I tried mailing the SIG but it got stuck in an approval queue never to be seen again. Regards, Jon On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:18 Haïkel wrote: > 2016-02-16 15:02 GMT+01:00 Jon Kent : > > Hi, > > > > I've been trying to see how we build Fedora AMIs but am starting having > not

Re: Fwd: Use suid_dumpable=2 for development releases

On Feb 15, 2016 10:36 PM, "Jakub Filak" wrote: > > It looks like that there are no opponents of this change but several supporters > and few of them even want to have suid_dumpable=2 in all releases. > > I was thinking about it and Richard W.M. Jones' email about safeness of > suid_dumpable=2 with

Re: Fedora AMI build process

2016-02-16 15:02 GMT+01:00 Jon Kent : > Hi, > > I've been trying to see how we build Fedora AMIs but am starting having not > luck with finding documents on the buiild process. If someone could throw me > a link it would be much appreciated. > > Thanks, > Jon > I suggest that you contact the Fedor

Fedora AMI build process

Hi, I've been trying to see how we build Fedora AMIs but am starting having not luck with finding documents on the buiild process. If someone could throw me a link it would be much appreciated. Thanks, Jon -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/li

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

On 16/02/16 10:51 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Given that there are dozens of those initializers it might be more readable to do: static const char none = -1; const char HEX2DEC[256] = { none, none, none, . } For the avoidance of doubt, this is not an error in C++11. Narrowing conversion

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

On 15/02/16 23:46 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Richard Shaw wrote on 02/15/2016 11:34 PM: Can someone point me in the right direction? My package openCOLLADA is FTBFS in rawhide with the following (repeating) error: /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenCOLLADA-3335ac164e68b2512a40914b14c74db260e6ff7d/COLLA

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

On 16/02/16 01:34 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:46:32 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: you are welcome, there will be more packages suffering from the same problem (I own at least one :-)), sometimes appending "-fsigned-char" to CFLAGS will be easier. A couple of narrowing-conv

Re: liborigin FTBFS

On 15/02/16 19:12 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: The problem is that the package defines a type 'function' in the global namespace, but also puts 'using namespace std;" in the global namespace, in a header. That causes the 'function' s

Re: GCC 6 and polymake

On 15/02/16 20:13 -0700, Jerry James wrote: Would one of you C++ experts help me out with a polymake build failure with gcc 6? Polymake defines a Vector class in lib/core/include/Vector.h (also see lib/core/include/GenericVector.h). Unlike with gcc 5 and earlier, everywhere in the code that som

Re: GCC6: failure with -isystem /usr/include

On 15/02/16 22:24 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 2 February 2016 at 07:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote: That said, why does it bother to do such a mess? Does it think the g++ driver is not able to do that itself? I am not sure why qmake-qt5 doesn't want to trust gcc for the system include dirs, but

GNOME Software 3.19.90 in F23 COPR

I've built a COPR with all the required bits to have GNOME Software 3.19.x in F23; normally this isn't an email-the-world thing but we're planning to backport just these packages into F23 (unusually for GNOME components) for the system upgrade-to-f24 functionality and so we wanted some early testin

Re: System CA certificate trust store management meeting

On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:08 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > unfortunately probably due to no mention of the public meetings in the > official DevConf schedule - they were mentioned only on a separate page > in the DevConf brochure - there was only a single non-redhatter that > appeared at the meeting

Re: GCC 6 Binaries segfaulting

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 02:33:18PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > I tried adding the workaround mentioned but it didn't seem to help. I responded in the BZ, but -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks really does help in this case, so this isn't a bug in the compiler. Marek -- devel mailing list de

Re: System CA certificate trust store management meeting

On Po, 2016-02-15 at 13:05 +, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 17:13 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > Hello, > > for anyone interested in the subject and visiting DevConf in Brno > > on  > > this Friday - we will be holding an informal meeting to gather use- > > cases  > > for needed