Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

2016-02-07 Thread Florian Weimer
On 02/08/2016 08:27 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: System Python = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/System_Python Is this intended to mirror Debian's python-minimal? What steps have been taken to accommodate Python upstream's wishes against creating subsets of th

F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

2016-02-07 Thread Jan Kurik
= Proposed Self Contained Change: System Python = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/System_Python Change owner(s): * Miro Hrončok * Petr Viktorin * Robert Kuska * Charalampos Stratakis Separate several subpackages form the python3 packages - a system-python(-libs) that can be required by va

Re: Python packages not compliant to Fedora guidelines

2016-02-07 Thread Kevin Kofler
Haïkel wrote: > (Qt packaging experience proved that was the only sane option). Actually, renaming qt to qt4 should be fairly easy, and probably should be done now (in fact, should have been done for F22), it's just a matter of a rename and Obsoletes/Provides. Of course, the issue becomes more

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Les Howell
On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 04:05 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > general for more on ARM, check out the ARM secondary arch team -- Thanks, Matthew. Regards, Les H -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Les Howell
On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 20:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Les Howell > wrote: > > Hi, guys, > > Don't know if this is the place to ask or not, but I wanted > > to > > use Pidora to do some imaging stuff with OpenCV. Turns out many of > > the > > requisite libr

Unretire Passenger EPEL7

2016-02-07 Thread Dennis Chen
Hi, I'd like to unretire Ruby Passenger for EPEL7. Sincerely, Dennis Chen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/deve

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - lnovich ooprala and vjancik

2016-02-07 Thread Randy Barlow
I forwarded this to vjancik at his personal address. -- Randy Barlow xmpp: bowlofe...@electronsweatshop.com irc: bowlofeggs on Freenode signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lis

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-02-07)

2016-02-07 Thread opensource
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 11:20:23AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > Well, we have the koji-shadow instance running AArch64 builds, > couldn't we bring in the people from Senaca and the Pi communities > wanting to use Pidora to help support ARMv6 in Fedora and add it as a > target in koji-shadow? Since s

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 04:13:07AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: >> I'm surprised to hear about Fedora working on the Pi Zero, since >> that's an ARMv6 computer. Are we bringing ARMv6 into the fold along >> with our ARMv7 and AArch64 support? It'd

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 04:13:07AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > I'm surprised to hear about Fedora working on the Pi Zero, since > that's an ARMv6 computer. Are we bringing ARMv6 into the fold along > with our ARMv7 and AArch64 support? It'd be pretty cool if we did, > since that would enable support

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Jonathan Lebon
> I'm surprised to hear about Fedora working on the Pi Zero, since > that's an ARMv6 computer. Are we bringing ARMv6 into the fold along > with our ARMv7 and AArch64 support? It'd be pretty cool if we did, > since that would enable support for a very wide range of ARM > computers... During his Dev

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 01:13:57AM -0800, Les Howell wrote: >> Don't know if this is the place to ask or not, but I wanted to >> use Pidora to do some imaging stuff with OpenCV. Turns out many of the >> requisite libraries are not in w

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 01:13:57AM -0800, Les Howell wrote: > Don't know if this is the place to ask or not, but I wanted to > use Pidora to do some imaging stuff with OpenCV. Turns out many of the > requisite libraries are not in what I have as the latest image, based > on Fedora 20 from th