On Sun, 2015-12-27 at 01:33 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I wanted to add a package for erlang-zlib, but I noticed that the
> upstream doesn't seem to have tagged any releases at all for the package:
>
> https://github.com/processone/zlib/issues/6
>
> Hopefully they will respond to my
On Sun, 2015-12-27 at 07:17 +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> I would prefer 0.0.0-0.1.git%{shortcommit}
This is against the versioning policy, which requires a date.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw
Thanks to everyone who replied!
--
Randy Barlow
xmpp: bowlofe...@electronsweatshop.com
irc: bowlofeggs on Freenode
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Missing expected images:
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151226:
Lxde live i386
Workstation live x86_64
Images in Rawhide 20151226 but not this:
Scientific_kde live i386
Mate live i386
Failed openQA tests: 4 of 61
ID: 1837Test: i386 kde_live defa
And the guidelines offer more than what is needed for many cases, but they
cover many different versioning scenarios.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
*
https://fedorapr
Compose started at Sun Dec 27 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Björn Esser wrote:
> Version: 0.0.0
The dotted zeros don't add any value here, they're just cruft.
"Version: 0" works fine.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
