On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
wrote:
> And now it is locked. I just can't drop it and redone (it is locked) and I
> can't do anything (it is locked).
> Any ideas?
Check this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi2#FAQ
Regards,
Parag.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
And now it is locked. I just can't drop it and redone (it is locked) and
I can't do anything (it is locked).
Any ideas?
Dmitrij
Hi!
Could anybody help to figure out what gone wrong here?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6ec19b0161
Dmitrij
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
That blog seems to describe supporting a stateless use case, not for
advocating that all systems should be stateless. In any case, the factory
reset use case they describe is similar to some of my own.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015, 23:32 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Harald
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On 16.12.2015 03:32, Colin Walters wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015, at 06:43 PM, Japheth Cleaver wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps RPM (or yum/dnf, via plugin) could write a duplicate copy of all
>>> config files into a tree somewhere? (E.g., /usr/lib/con
On 12/21/2015 01:19 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
Could we have a mod_rewrite rule for bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/packagename ?
One already existed. Have you not tried it?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/libreswan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedorap
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> I agree. I think Fedora should use Grub the way that the Grub
> developers thing Grub should be used, and that is to use
> grub2-mkconfig to propagate configuration (/etc/grub.d, etc) and
> kernel changes into the grub config.
Probably
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:19:15PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I really miss the simple URL lookup to find links to the last few
> package builds of a certain package. Eg for libreswan, I could use:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libreswan/
>
> Now I have to go search ar
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
>> Grub2-mkconfig works fine on F23. Maybe not for complex operations but for
>> general modifications to /etc/default/grub it creates a perfectly working
>> grub.cfg
>
> Sure, but do
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
> Grub2-mkconfig works fine on F23. Maybe not for complex operations but for
> general modifications to /etc/default/grub it creates a perfectly working
> grub.cfg
The default menu entries for other OS's is definitely suboptimal. OS X
and Wind
Hi,
I really miss the simple URL lookup to find links to the last few
package builds of a certain package. Eg for libreswan, I could use:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libreswan/
Now I have to go search around and type in a package name, eg:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?
Hi all,
The latest version of the Free Pascal Compiler (fpc) has support for
armhl. But the prior release of fpc has been added to the repository
with some patches to make it work. The problem is now that the current
(patched) fpc-version in the repository is unable to compile the
official ve
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
0 packages were orphaned
7 packages were retired
nodejs-lodash [master] was retired by jamielinux
A low-level utility library delivering consist
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151220:
Xfce live x86_64
Images in Rawhide 20151220 but not this:
Mate live x86_64
Scientific_kde live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3 of 61
ID: 1460Test: i386 kde_live de
On 21.12.2015 08:23, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 21/12/15 01:36, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>
>> I'm currently looking into using npm v3 with nodejs v4. The problem I've
>> run into is that npm is apparently part of the main nodejs package which
>> effectively joins them at the hip for no apparent go
Hi folks,
after a couple of weeks we have released an update of Fedora Developer
Portal [1].
New things:
- Virt-builder section under "Tools" menu [2].
- Abrt section under "Tools" menu [3]
This update of Fedora Developer Portal also contains several graphical
and spelling fixes.
The Fedora
- Original Message -
> From: "jens"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 11:47:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Let's write metadata about add-ons
>
> Am 2015-12-21 11:36, schrieb Jiri Eischmann:
> > Hi,
> > due to previous efforts we have a pretty g
Dne 21.12.2015 v 11:36 Jiri Eischmann napsal(a):
> Hi,
> due to previous efforts we have a pretty good appdata coverage of apps
> themselves, but add-ons (plugins, extensions,...) lag far behind. There are
> dozens of useful GUI app add-ons in Fedora repositories which don't have
> metadata file
Dne 13.12.2015 v 05:58 Christopher napsal(a):
> Which components/packages are best candidates for adding a feature which
> would make it easier for users to track
> changes from the default %config %files on the system?
... [SNIP] ...
> rpmconf is nice, because it helps me easily compare configura
Compose started at Mon Dec 21 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
For Ruby, regenerating all the generated content would be a huge burden.
I can't really imagine the Ruby bootstrap, since you need to have Ruby
to build Ruby, I don't think we can identify every piece which is/was
generated nor we can collect the or
Am 2015-12-21 11:36, schrieb Jiri Eischmann:
Hi,
due to previous efforts we have a pretty good appdata coverage of apps
themselves, but add-ons (plugins, extensions,...) lag far behind.
There are dozens of useful GUI app add-ons in Fedora repositories
which don't have metadata files and are not e
Hi,
due to previous efforts we have a pretty good appdata coverage of apps
themselves, but add-ons (plugins, extensions,...) lag far behind. There are
dozens of useful GUI app add-ons in Fedora repositories which don't have
metadata files and are not exposed to users in GNOME Software. Let's foc
On 12/18/2015 08:13 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * Code that was pre-generated by upstream may have been done with
> build flags that differ from Fedora's own set of hardened and
> optimized flags, resulting in a poorer experience (or less secure
It might also be interesting to talk to people i
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please keep responses on the devel@ list. CCed to the Council list for
visibility and discussion of how this fits with our "Freedom" foundation.
== Premise ==
Some upstream distribute tarballs that incl
24 matches
Mail list logo
