An update on this:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> This is only a minor annoyance where a portable fallback exists (we can
> just ship the portable C/C++ version in /usr/lib and the SSE2 version in
> /usr/lib/sse2, as we are doing with Qt 5 QtDeclarative). The real problem
> is software which has no portabl
On 21/12/15 01:36, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
I'm currently looking into using npm v3 with nodejs v4. The problem I've
run into is that npm is apparently part of the main nodejs package which
effectively joins them at the hip for no apparent good reason.
Upstream ships npm with nodejs because
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm currently looking into using npm v3 with nodejs v4. The problem I've
> run into is that npm is apparently part of the main nodejs package which
> effectively joins them at the hip for no apparent good reason.
>
> Upstream sh
Hi,
I'm currently looking into using npm v3 with nodejs v4. The problem I've
run into is that npm is apparently part of the main nodejs package which
effectively joins them at the hip for no apparent good reason.
Upstream ships npm with nodejs because they need npm to bootstrap the
environment and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114370
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114007
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285277
It created a feeling that does not touch the gnome and the server is secondary.
and certainly with regard RedHad.
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-12-21
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
So as many of you know, Red Hat does a holiday shutdown each year, so
we RHers will be off next week.
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151219:
Minimal disk raw armhfp
Lxde live x86_64
Images in Rawhide 20151219 but not this:
Xfce live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2 of 61
ID: 1392Test: i386 kde_live defau
> What does mean this warning on Bodhi?
It's some aversion that bodhi has developed recently to F-22 updates,
I've reported it upstream here
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/746
See other bodhi threads on the list for other discussion
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
Am Sonntag, den 20.12.2015, 12:29 +0100 schrieb Antonio Trande:
> Hi all,
>
> What does mean this warning on Bodhi?
>
>
> libsbml-5.12.0-3.fc22 ejected from the push because u"Cannot find
> relevant tag for libsbml-5.12.0-3.fc22. None of ['f22-updates-
> testing',
> 'f22-updates-testing-pending'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
What does mean this warning on Bodhi?
libsbml-5.12.0-3.fc22 ejected from the push because u"Cannot find
relevant tag for libsbml-5.12.0-3.fc22. None of ['f22-updates-testing',
'f22-updates-testing-pending'] are in [u'epel7-testing-candidat
Compose started at Sun Dec 20 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
Am 20.12.2015 um 00:12 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:31:08 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
%global sover 1
…
%install
# Install the built binaries.
ln -fs %{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}.0 \
%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}
…
%files
# doc-files, licens
12 matches
Mail list logo
