On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Could anybody help to figure out what gone wrong here?
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6ec19b0161
I've seen it a couple of times this week while doing the updates
pushe, not sure what's going on but I've
Hi!
Could anybody help to figure out what gone wrong here?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6ec19b0161
Dmitrij
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:31:08 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
> > %global sover 1
> >
> > …
> >
> > %install
> > # Install the built binaries.
> >
> > ln -fs %{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}.0 \
> > %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libpasplan404.so.%{sover}
> >
> > …
> >
> > %files
> > # doc-files, license,
The "perl -w" option is also deprecated, and usually quite
inappropriate to put in the #! line. It's aimed at producing warnings
about *potential* problems, and can generate spew that is difficult to
parse in normal operation.
See http://www.perl.com/pub/2004/08/09/commandline.html for details on
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones writes:
>
> RWMJ> Couldn't it use inotify (or whatever we're using these days to
> RWMJ> detect filesystem changes)? So when you drop in the unit file,
> RWMJ> systemd notices and reloads.
>
> Well, the point is that systemd isn't
Il 19/12/2015 15:02, Björn Esser ha scritto:
Am 19.12.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Mattia Verga:
While checking rpms for a new package with rpmlint I encountered the
error:
libpasastro.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink
/usr/lib64/libpasplan404.so.1.0
Now, packaging guidelines doesn't say anywhere (or a
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Minimal disk raw armhfp
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151218
Images in Rawhide 20151218 but not this:
Minimal disk raw armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 3 of 57
ID: 1326Test: x86_64 kde_live default_inst
Am 19.12.2015 um 14:11 schrieb Mattia Verga:
While checking rpms for a new package with rpmlint I encountered the error:
libpasastro.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libpasplan404.so.1.0
Now, packaging guidelines doesn't say anywhere (or at least I was unable
to find it) that symbolic l
While checking rpms for a new package with rpmlint I encountered the error:
libpasastro.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libpasplan404.so.1.0
Now, packaging guidelines doesn't say anywhere (or at least I was unable
to find it) that symbolic links to soname must be installed by the
pack
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 02:13:54PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 1) Do we require that the original data used to generate this code is
> included in the SRPM?
Yes. This seems like a widely accepted principle in the free software
world. eg. The GNU GPL contains this phrase: "The source code f
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 24 Rawhide 20151219. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Compose started at Sat Dec 19 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
12 matches
Mail list logo
