Hi,
I have a strange issue with making a scratch build on koji for epel7
[1]. My local mock build tells me I have openmpi-1.6.4. But during koji
builds I have openmpi-1.10.0. That strange. I see there was openmpi
update for rawhide but why it triggers epel7 builds?
Anyway is there a way to r
On 12/08/2015 01:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:07:53PM +0100, Piotr Popieluch wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Jos de Kloe wrote:
>>
>>> This package review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751749
>>> has been stalled for several years
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Kde live x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151207:
Design_suite live x86_64
Design_suite live i386
No images in Rawhide 20151207 but not this.
Failed
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> can any provenpackager change dependency in meld package for F22? There's
> dependency on package
> python-gobject (which doesn't exist) and there should be pygobject2 probably.
> I already filled
> bugzila for that https://bug
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 12:26:01PM -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > The voting machine: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/open
> There is an obvious 'typo' on that page --
> s/Lost/Last/
Either it's fixed now, or else you're just seeing the effect of
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, Jan Kurik wrote:
> The voting machine: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/open
There is an obvious 'typo' on that page --
s/Lost/Last/
-- Russ herrold
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedor
Emergency Planned Outage: fedorainfracloud.org / copr - 2015-12-08 18:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2015-12-08 18:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date
Hi folks,
can any provenpackager change dependency in meld package for F22? There's
dependency on package
python-gobject (which doesn't exist) and there should be pygobject2 probably. I
already filled
bugzila for that https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288593
Actual available package
>
> > I am running the rawhide-no-debug-alloc kernel with F23. I had three
> saved
> > 4.3 kernels. dnf.conf was not changed. I wanted to keep a total of six
> > kernels and edited /etc/dnf/protected.d/dnf.conf to read;
> >
> > [main]
> > gpgcheck=1
> > installonlypkgs=kernel.x86_64, kernel-core.x
On 08/12/15 08:58, Paul Howarth wrote:
> It's not a different version. It's an exact clone of the RHEL package
> except with "0." in front of the release to make sure the RHEL package
> "wins" where it is available. It is in fact the official EPEL
> limited-arch package policy:
>
> https://fedorap
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:39:50 -0500, Zach Villers wrote:
> Sorry if this is the wrong list;
>
> I am running the rawhide-no-debug-alloc kernel with F23. I had three saved
> 4.3 kernels. dnf.conf was not changed. I wanted to keep a total of six
> kernels and edited /etc/dnf/protected.d/dnf.conf to r
Sorry if this is the wrong list;
I am running the rawhide-no-debug-alloc kernel with F23. I had three saved
4.3 kernels. dnf.conf was not changed. I wanted to keep a total of six
kernels and edited /etc/dnf/protected.d/dnf.conf to read;
[main]
gpgcheck=1
installonlypkgs=kernel.x86_64, kernel-core
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'm quite lost with the fedora notifications [0] for email. Do you
know which is the option to send me an email once a package is ready to
be pushed to stable? (i.e., when the waiting period has passed or the
feedback reached the threshold).
I don't thi
Dne 8.12.2015 v 13:15 Tom Hughes napsal(a):
> On 08/12/15 12:05, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>
>> I'm quite lost with the fedora notifications [0] for email. Do you
>> know which is the option to send me an email once a package is ready to
>> be pushed to stable? (i.e., when the waiting period
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:07:53PM +0100, Piotr Popieluch wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Jos de Kloe wrote:
>
> > This package review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751749
> > has been stalled for several years now since the original submitter
> > (Karel Klíč) never got ba
On 08/12/15 12:05, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
I'm quite lost with the fedora notifications [0] for email. Do you
know which is the option to send me an email once a package is ready to
be pushed to stable? (i.e., when the waiting period has passed or the
feedback reached the threshold).
Hi,
I'm quite lost with the fedora notifications [0] for email. Do you
know which is the option to send me an email once a package is ready to
be pushed to stable? (i.e., when the waiting period has passed or the
feedback reached the threshold).
regards,
Nikos
[0]. https://apps.fedoraproject.org
Compose started at Tue Dec 8 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
Hi all,
Bringing this topic from meeting discussion to mailing list for
wider audience.
Often after completion of translation package get updated with more
string or sometime translated .po file does not get pulled while
building package. This causes L10N string breakage.
Anaconda is maj
Hello everyone!
The voting for FESCo, Council and FAmSCo elections is now open. The
period closes promptly at 23:59:00 UTC on December 14th.
Please vote for your favourite candidates:
The voting machine: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/open
Council: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/a
On 8.12.2015 10:34, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.12.2015 um 10:25 schrieb Petr Spacek:
>> On 8.12.2015 09:41, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>Hi,
>>>
Start moving away from
split DNS because that's going to be very hard to support.
>>>
>>> Seriously? How do you suggest to handle DNS fo
On 7.12.2015 20:35, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 07.12.15 15:31, Björn Persson (Bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
>
>> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> You *have* to use the local DNS servers by default, even if they are
>>> crap.
>>
>> I for one want my laptop to be suspicious of random DNS server
Am 08.12.2015 um 10:25 schrieb Petr Spacek:
On 8.12.2015 09:41, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Start moving away from
split DNS because that's going to be very hard to support.
Seriously? How do you suggest to handle DNS for my 192.168.2.0/24 home
network then? Making the forward zone for h
On 8.12.2015 09:41, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Start moving away from
>> split DNS because that's going to be very hard to support.
>
> Seriously? How do you suggest to handle DNS for my 192.168.2.0/24 home
> network then? Making the forward zone for home.kraxel.org public would
> at lea
On 07/12/15 17:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
FYI, this discussion might be better on the actual epel-devel list...
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:17:54 +
Paul Howarth wrote:
On 07/12/15 14:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
...snip...
Could make a compat package in EPEL7 be an option?
This way you introduce
Hi,
> Start moving away from
> split DNS because that's going to be very hard to support.
Seriously? How do you suggest to handle DNS for my 192.168.2.0/24 home
network then? Making the forward zone for home.kraxel.org public would
at least work, although I fail to see the point in having pub
On 12/07/2015 09:40 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>>> Clearly, fedora cannot be changed to hijack a real domain, so
>>> Fritzbox better
>>> solve this quickly with an update, even if no one actually will
>>> update their
>>> router :(
>>
>> Well, AVM could j
27 matches
Mail list logo
