Re: Let's Encrypt for F23?

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:58:15PM +, Christopher wrote: > I see a couple of the Let's Encrypt dependencies (like python-acme) are > working their way in to rawhide, but not yet in F23. I also don't yet see a > 'letsencrypt' package. > > Since it's now in "Public Beta"[1], having it available

Re: DNF could improve messages about package auto-removal

On Thu, 03 Dec 2015 22:13:56 +0100, James Antill wrote: > 2) Change the config. from the current gamble of save $0.0001 of disk > space on the upside, It is not about saving the disk space but about manageable number of config and binary files on your system. When I search for something I

Scalability of FE-DEADREVIEW

So with my little one keeping me up all night I figured I could at least be a little productive. It turns out we have just under 1000 bugs against package review in the NEW state. Now if even just half of these don't have requesters that respond that's still 500 that according to stalled review p

Re: Let's Encrypt for F23?

On 4 Dec 2015 3:00 a.m., "Randy Barlow" wrote: > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> > Things like python-dialog-2.7-20 in F23 when 3.0+ is needed as one example. > > > Nothing in the distro uses python-dialog. I think it should > > be fine to update. > > Don't forget that users might be dep

Re: Let's Encrypt for F23?

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> > Things like python-dialog-2.7-20 in F23 when 3.0+ is needed as one example. > Nothing in the distro uses python-dialog. I think it should > be fine to update. Don't forget that users might be depending on the version 2 API with software they've written that

Re: Let's Encrypt for F23?

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:24:58PM +, James Hogarth wrote: > On 3 December 2015 at 22:04, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:58:15PM +, Christopher wrote: > > > I see a couple of the Let's Encrypt dependencies (like python-acme) are > > > working their way in to rawh

Re: Samba AD and MIT Kerberos with trust to FreeIPA update

On 3 December 2015 at 19:14, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > Hi, > > (repost to Fedora development) > > I've posted few screenshots of the current status of Samba AD with MIT > Kerberos running on Fedora 23 and establishing cross-forest trust to > FreeIPA on my Google+ page: > https://plus.google.com/

Re: Let's Encrypt for F23?

On 3 December 2015 at 22:04, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:58:15PM +, Christopher wrote: > > I see a couple of the Let's Encrypt dependencies (like python-acme) are > > working their way in to rawhide, but not yet in F23. I also don't yet > see a > > 'letsencrypt' package

Re: Let's Encrypt for F23?

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:58:15PM +, Christopher wrote: > I see a couple of the Let's Encrypt dependencies (like python-acme) are > working their way in to rawhide, but not yet in F23. I also don't yet see a > 'letsencrypt' package. > Since it's now in "Public Beta"[1], having it available soo

Let's Encrypt for F23?

I see a couple of the Let's Encrypt dependencies (like python-acme) are working their way in to rawhide, but not yet in F23. I also don't yet see a 'letsencrypt' package. Since it's now in "Public Beta"[1], having it available soon might be very useful for F23 users. Does anybody have any plans t

Re: DNF could improve messages about package auto-removal

On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 09:02 +0100, Petr Spacek wrote: > On 1.12.2015 08:20, Dan Book wrote: > > I have run into this before and it was very confusing, it really should be > > a separate command from remove for when you actually want to remove what > > dnf thinks is now "unused". In yum autoremove

Re: Updating cppformat in Rawhide?

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 12/03/2015 07:13 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > > cppformat 2.0.0 was released [1] and it has several breaking changes. In > > addition to API/ABI changes, the soname changed and the header file was > > relocated. Since this package was recent

Re: Samba AD and MIT Kerberos with trust to FreeIPA update

On 3 Dec 2015 19:14, "Alexander Bokovoy" wrote: > > Hi, > > (repost to Fedora development) > > I've posted few screenshots of the current status of Samba AD with MIT > Kerberos running on Fedora 23 and establishing cross-forest trust to > FreeIPA on my Google+ page: > https://plus.google.com/+Alex

Samba AD and MIT Kerberos with trust to FreeIPA update

Hi, (repost to Fedora development) I've posted few screenshots of the current status of Samba AD with MIT Kerberos running on Fedora 23 and establishing cross-forest trust to FreeIPA on my Google+ page: https://plus.google.com/+AlexanderBokovoy/posts/NgozL7Rgw64 The patches to Samba are in Andr

Re: Updating cppformat in Rawhide?

On 12/03/2015 07:13 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > cppformat 2.0.0 was released [1] and it has several breaking changes. In > addition to API/ABI changes, the soname changed and the header file was > relocated. Since this package was recently added to Fedora, I don't know > if any packages depend on it

Updating cppformat in Rawhide?

cppformat 2.0.0 was released [1] and it has several breaking changes. In addition to API/ABI changes, the soname changed and the header file was relocated. Since this package was recently added to Fedora, I don't know if any packages depend on it, so my question is "Is this a "self contained" or "s

heads up: splitting the GUI toolkit integration parts of pyudev into separate packages

In response to a bug about a missing dependency in the python-pyudev packages, I thought I would look for and add the rest of the missing dependencies as well, and hey, wow, what's all this GUI stuff doing in here. pyudev includes modules for integrating with the main loops of glib, pyqt4, pys

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Tomas Hozza wrote: > On 03.12.2015 14:54, Jan Kurik wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote: >>> On 03.12.2015 11:40, Jan Kurik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/C

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

On 03.12.2015 14:54, Jan Kurik wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote: >> On 03.12.2015 11:40, Jan Kurik wrote: >>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service = >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service >>> >>> Change o

Re: Requesting provenpackager intervention

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > >> >> adding new arch into the fpc package is not straightforward, it needs a >> boostrapping procedure first. And also updating to a version where >> ppc64le really works. > > > Yes, I neede

Re: Requesting provenpackager intervention

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > > adding new arch into the fpc package is not straightforward, it needs a > boostrapping procedure first. And also updating to a version where > ppc64le really works. Yes, I needed it for an el6 COPR build and I figured it out but it took a bit

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote: > On 03.12.2015 11:40, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service >> >> Change owner(s): >> * Colin Walters >> * Adam Miller

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

On 03.12.2015 11:40, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service > > Change owner(s): > * Colin Walters > * Adam Miller > * Tomas Tomecek > * Tim Waugh > * Amanda Carter > >

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Fedora 24 Boost 1.60 uplift

Jonathan Wakely wrote: > What you meant was "Does this mean one of upgrade or update, rather > than uplift?" and the answer is yes, but I asked which one of upgrade > or update it should be. > > If it doesn't matter I'll just pick one and use that for future Boost > update proposals (I seem to hav

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read songyi...@ict.ac.cn --- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedorapro

Re: Requesting provenpackager intervention

On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:54:55 +0100 Mattia Verga wrote: > Can any provenpackager change in fpc .spec file the ExclusiveArch > from ppc to ppc64le? > This is blocking several other projects to build on ppc64le. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247925 > http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.

rawhide report: 20151203 changes

Compose started at Thu Dec 3 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

F24 System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service

= Proposed System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service Change owner(s): * Colin Walters * Adam Miller * Tomas Tomecek * Tim Waugh * Amanda Carter Fedora currently ships a Docker base image, but Docker supp

F24 Self Contained Change: OpenShift Origin

= Proposed Self Contained Change: OpenShift Origin = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenShiftOrigin Change owner(s): * Adam Miller OpenShift Origin is an Open Source Platform as a Service Cloud offering from Red Hat. The goal of this Change is to bring OpenShift Origin Architecture v3 in

Requesting provenpackager intervention

Can any provenpackager change in fpc .spec file the ExclusiveArch from ppc to ppc64le? This is blocking several other projects to build on ppc64le. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247925 http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=329821 Thanks -- devel mailing list de

Re: Cannot open logs of Taskotron jobs

- Original Message - > From: "Juan Orti Alcaine" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 8:54:21 AM > Subject: Cannot open logs of Taskotron jobs > > Hi, > > I'm trying to open the logs of a couple of failed Taskotron jobs, but > I get a f